x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch At Eternity's Gate

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(23660) 6.9 111 min 2018

At Eternity's Gate is a movie starring Willem Dafoe, Rupert Friend, and Oscar Isaac. A look at the life of painter Vincent van Gogh during the time he lived in Arles and Auvers-sur-Oise, France.

Starring: Willem Dafoe, Mads Mikkelsen, Rupert Friend, Oscar Isaac

Genres: Drama, Biography

Director: Julian Schnabel

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Drama, Biography
Director	Julian Schnabel
Writer	Louise Kugelberg, Jean-Claude Carrière, Julian Schnabel
Stars	Willem Dafoe, Mads Mikkelsen, Rupert Friend, Oscar Isaac
Country	Ireland, USA, UK, France, Switzerland
Also Known As	Van Gogs. Pie mūžības vārtiem, Van Gogh en la puerta de la eternidad, Vincent van Gogh - Vid evighetens port, 梵谷：在永恆之門, 永遠の門　ゴッホの見た未来, No Portal da Eternidade, Van Gogh - Ikuisuuden porteilla, Van Gogh. U bram wieczności, Van Gogh: Sonsuzluğun Kapısında, À Porta da Eternidade, Van Gogh - Auf der Schwelle zur Ewigkeit, Van Gogh, a las puertas de la eternidad, 永遠の門ゴッホの見た未来, Prie amžinybes vartu, Vid evighetens port, Van Gogh - An der Schwelle zur Ewigkeit, Van Gogh - At Eternity's Gate, À la porte de l'éternité, Na kapiji večnosti, Van Gokh: Be'Sha'arei Ha'Netzakh, Van Gogh - Ved evighedens port, Van Gogh - Sulla soglia dell'eternità, Van Gogh: En la puerta de la eternidad, Στην πύλη της αιωνιότητας, La poarta eternităţii
Runtime	1H 51M
Description	During a self-imposed exile in Arles and Auvers-Sur-Oise, France, Dutch painter Vincent van Gogh develops his unique, colorful style of painting. While grappling with religion, mental illness and a tumultuous friendship with French artist Paul Gauguin, van Gogh begins to focus on his relationship with eternity rather than the pain his art causes him in the present.

Download drama «At Eternity's Gate»

Blu-ray
13.64 GB

Windows
5.34 GB

Customers who watched «At Eternity's Gate» also watched

29 customer reviews about biography «At Eternity's Gate»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Sunday, 28 Jun 2020 15:16

In the summer of 1920, the English and American consulates in the Philippines were raided by members of the Ku Klux Klan. This film covers the story of these events from the point of view of three of the protagonists. There is little action, and it is important to emphasize that this is a very small group of individuals. The film is only a snapshot of a whole complex group. The group includes Reverend, Mrs. Biermann, David Blane, and a number of others. The women are the star players in the film. Each woman has a personal connection to the Klan. The women are working class and their lives are affected by the Klan. The film explores their feelings about the Klan and the state of affairs at the time. The film is very long, and the story is somewhat complicated. It is very interesting to see the progression of the lives of the women in the film. One of the things that the film does very well is to demonstrate the contradictions of the Klan. It is a movement for racial harmony and religious tolerance. The women are very patriotic, but there is also a hatred of their "racists". The film presents a series of photographs and oral histories that help to show the different attitudes of the women toward the Klan. In the end, the film is an interesting and moving look at the Klan and its participants.

Sunday, 28 Jun 2020 15:07

I am not sure that I agree with the other comments that say "This is a much better film". But it is, and I think this film is the best I have seen of the three. It is not the best I have seen, but it is better than any of the other films that have come out recently. I think it is the best film I have seen that has dealt with the early-twenties. I think that this film has a strong social message, but not in a way that is pushing it to the edge of the political spectrum. I think the social message is more of a moral one, and this is what I believe is important. I think that the message is in the original and not in the re-make. I think that the message is that "it is wrong to treat people as things, to be greedy, or to get money for people that are not needed." This message is present in the original. I think that the re-make makes it a little more in-depth, but I think that this is more important than being deeper. I think that this is one of the best films I have seen, and I would highly recommend it.

Brittany Simmons

Monday, 22 Jun 2020 06:03

I was watching the movie at a family reunion and we were discussing the movie. One person mentioned that they felt that it was a very moving movie and said that they were crying so hard that they couldn't stop. I was moved to tears, as well. I think that everyone should see this movie. This movie is very moving and I am so glad that I was able to see it. This is not a movie that you will see again, but it will stay with you forever.

Thursday, 18 Jun 2020 01:54

In my opinion, the greatest movie of all time. A masterpiece. Everyone should see this movie at least once. I just can't find words to describe it. It's so moving, and so beautiful. I've seen it a hundred times and I never get tired of it. I give it 10 stars. If you haven't seen it, see it. It's worth it.

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 20:29

I didn't read the book. I only saw the movie. The book was so good that it scared me, but the movie wasn't bad at all. I don't want to spoil the movie for anyone who hasn't read the book. I'm surprised that no one commented on this. Overall, I thought it was a good movie. I thought it was better than most of the films in the market at the moment. I think it was better than the film "The Wizard of Oz." I'm sure that's the only one that would be good. I liked the film "Gone with the Wind." It was different than most of the films out there at the moment. I didn't think it was as good as "The Wizard of Oz." But I'm sure that's the only one that would be good. I think "The Wizard of Oz" is the best film ever. I give this movie a 7 out of 10.

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 14:41

It's an absolutely incredible movie. I went to the cinema with a friend of mine and the whole thing was shot on the same film (not the same location, but the same film). I can't describe the magic of it. The story is really a story about the magic of nature, and nature's magic. It's a story about the love between two lovers. It's about the danger of one of the men. It's about the strength of one of the women. It's about the beauty of one of the landscapes. It's about a great landscape. It's about one great love. It's about a great cinema. And it's about the greatest cinematic story ever told.

Monday, 15 Jun 2020 01:18

Having read a number of the reviews for this film, I decided to watch it at the cinema. In the beginning, I was not impressed, mainly because I had never heard of it before, and the plot was too disjointed. The film didn't seem to me to be very accurate to the real events, in which the writer spent a lot of time researching. Also, the story felt too long and drawn out. However, the film did contain some powerful scenes, such as the scene in which the wounded army doctor is driven to madness by his new disease, which is quite realistic. I found the film quite fascinating, although I had not heard of the writer or his film before, so I couldn't really understand the impact of the film. I think the story is a good example of what an article about the search for truth could be like, and the director, like I said, has made a very good film about it. I think it is worth a watch, and I hope that people who have not seen it before will give it a chance.

Sunday, 14 Jun 2020 03:41

This film is amazing. I watched it with my dad and he loved it as much as I did. I had been looking for a film to watch, and this was on the top list. It is one of the best films I have ever seen. It has the feel of a documentary, the acting is excellent, and the story line is very moving. I am so proud of the cast and the crew for a job well done. I have been watching documentaries since I was 10 years old, and this is by far the best. It will make you laugh, it will make you cry, it will make you feel. I love this film and will watch it over and over again. It is a movie I can watch over and over again and never get tired of it.

Friday, 05 Jun 2020 21:25

I had high expectations for this film, mainly because of the great cast and the fact that George Clooney had a big part to play. But this movie just does not live up to its hype. Sure, the movie was interesting enough, but the story was somewhat predictable and some of the actors just did not deliver. The thing that was so frustrating was that there was no reason for this movie to exist other than Clooney and Julia Roberts being good together. And there is no reason for Julia Roberts to be in this movie. This is a woman that is very good in her roles, but this is just another role that she is so good at that it was painful to watch. She was in the best of movies, but this is just not one of them. I was also disappointed that we never really got to know the characters well enough. I thought they would get more into them, but they just were not that interesting. This is not to say that the movie is bad, but I was just disappointed. I still believe that George Clooney is one of the greatest actors ever, but he just did not do this movie justice. He should have won an Oscar for this role, but I guess it was just not enough to warrant the nomination.

Sunday, 31 May 2020 15:54

This is a film that should be watched in the theater as a movie about a certain period of time, but on a personal level is a compelling look at the dangers of the big city. The film has many great performances, and I think most of the cast were cast very well. There were a few flaws, but those I can forgive, and all in all, the film is very enjoyable.

Tuesday, 26 May 2020 14:09

I had no idea what to expect going into this film, but I really didn't know what to expect. I had read a couple of reviews and was wondering if it was going to be "so bad it's good" or a film that was "so bad it's good". I was very pleasantly surprised! I'm so glad I went to see it, and I can't wait to see it again! The acting in this movie is very good. The story is very well written, and the cinematography is amazing. I think it's the best movie I've seen in a while. I think it's one of the best movies of the year. It is a great movie, but it is not just a movie. It is a very well done movie that deserves a lot of recognition.

Saturday, 23 May 2020 07:36

Billed as the Oscar-winning film of the year, I wasn't expecting much, but I think that's a good thing. It's a well-crafted, nicely made film, with a surprisingly fine cast. There are a few flaws, but they are easily overlooked when you see the scope of the film. The pace is slow at times, but the story is well-told and is engaging. While the film is very over-dramatic, it's a well-acted film and it's easy to believe that this is real life. The music is wonderful, and the cinematography is fabulous. The film is more than just a movie, and it's well-made, but it's not Oscar-winning. The acting is good, the music is beautiful, and the pacing is slow, but it's a good film. Worth seeing, if you like good films, like good music, and want to see a good movie.

Friday, 22 May 2020 10:00

I've never read the book and I'm sure I'll never read the book. But I do know I was very impressed with this film. I loved how it portrayed the characters and the environment. It really did capture the feel of the time and the place. The acting was great, especially Robert Redford's character. He gave a very believable performance. It was great to see him go through a few things and then come out of it all the better for it. It was great to see the more feminine aspect of the character, which I felt was well portrayed. The camera work was amazing. I felt it was a perfect representation of the time period and the atmosphere. It really made me feel like I was there. The story was great, as were the characters. I would definitely recommend this film to anyone who hasn't seen it yet. It was a great movie and I can't wait for the DVD. If you're a fan of the book, I would highly recommend this film.

Tuesday, 19 May 2020 15:20

This movie is quite special, for me, because it is an autobiography of the writer. I was told that the film was based on a true story, but it was made up and it turned out that it was a lie. It was good that the movie was based on a true story, because it did not ruin the movie for me. The director of the movie did a good job at making it seem like it was real. I have no problems with it. I think it is a good thing that it was made into a movie. People who liked this movie will probably like "The Postman" which is another documentary about this famous man.

Janet Schneider

Friday, 15 May 2020 11:11

There are no redeeming qualities in this film. This movie was made for people who are already spoiled rotten. It's hard to imagine that anyone would enjoy it. I don't like Robert Duvall's acting in this film, but I don't think he's a bad actor. Maybe it's just the poor quality of the film. I've always loved him. I really liked the first Star Wars. But I've come to realize that he's only a good actor if he's great at acting. This is one of those films where he can't be good at acting, so he's just wasted. His performance was so wooden and wooden that he had to be lying. It's like he's been in a factory for years and he's just had his work taken away. He's a really good actor. I know he was a great actor in other movies. But he doesn't fit in this movie. He's just wasted. What a waste. The one good thing about this film is the photography. The scenic photography was really nice. The sets and props were good. But the editing is really bad. The pacing is horrible. It's really slow. It's a little over two hours long. It just goes on and on and on. There's a lot of scenes that go on for too long. I had to turn the volume down on my DVD player because I couldn't stand it anymore. I guess I'm glad I didn't pay to see this movie. It's just really slow and it's not entertaining. I've seen a lot of films that are more entertaining than this one. This one is really bad.

Saturday, 09 May 2020 23:43

At Eternity's Gate was the most underrated film in the Academy Awards. It is a nice film that manages to deal with the issues that most movies have no interest in. The film deals with the plight of Native Americans in 1857, the Black slave trade in the United States, the ending of the Civil War, and the Vietnam War. The acting is really good from all the actors in this movie, especially James Caviezel as the great Dr. Martin Luther King. This is a great film that has everything you want from a film. A great movie, that deserves to be seen. The only bad thing is that the film could have been better, but overall it is a good film.

Saturday, 09 May 2020 02:07

I have been a fan of Billy Jack since the early 70's, I love the movie and I love the books. The movie was beautifully done, with the actors portraying their characters perfectly. I am a fan of Cary Elwes, he was a great choice for the role of William Blake. I am glad he was cast in this role. The acting was very well done, the director did a great job. I have read the book, and the movie was much better than I expected. It was a wonderful experience watching the movie. I would recommend it to anyone who loves a good movie, it was a wonderful experience watching the movie. I was very impressed by the book and I am glad they made a movie out of it.

Sunday, 03 May 2020 16:33

I have always been a fan of William Faulkner's work, and this movie does a great job of recreating the first three novels, including the gorgeous, beautiful dialogue of Faulkner. However, the movie did have a few flaws. I don't think the movie was an accurate portrayal of what really happened, and the ending was a little too simplistic. I also didn't like the manner in which the movie ended, and it did leave me with a feeling of disappointment. All in all, I enjoyed this movie very much, and I recommend it to anyone who is a fan of Faulkner's works.

Thursday, 30 Apr 2020 13:54

This is one of those films that I remember watching in the cinema years ago. Aghast at the film's over-all pretentiousness I couldn't help thinking of it as a wasted experience, yet I was very much attracted to it. Now, I've seen it a couple of times. I can honestly say that it's now one of my favourites. There are many people that find the story, and the characters, annoying. I think the reason I didn't like it was because I was used to the way it was done in the theatre, where I saw it at the time. The performances were very good, especially the main character, Jake, played by Liam Neeson. I felt like he was being extremely forced and unnatural, and this affected the way I viewed the film. He was forced to do things that made no sense to the plot, and this was irritating. However, I really liked him, and I think he brought a lot to the film, although I was worried he would come across as a pathetic character in a couple of scenes. I also thought the movie was not as hard hitting as I was led to believe, as I thought the film's ending would have made more sense. However, the fact that it was the only film that I can really remember being this good is something I can't shake off. In fact, I've only seen it twice. I will definitely be seeing it again.

Wednesday, 29 Apr 2020 12:24

This movie is a mix of a couple of very different movies. It is a look at the life of a man from the New England to the English coast. What he experiences on the journey is interesting and beautiful. On the one hand he encounters cultures that he is unfamiliar with. He meets people of different cultures. He meets people who have different ideas of what God is. He meets people who think that there is a divine force that will end the war. He encounters people who believe that the war is God's way of punishing the Jewish people for their sin of rejecting Christ. The music in the movie is very good. I liked the songs that were not part of the movie and they added to the movie. The movie is very well done. The acting is very good and the cinematography is very good. I highly recommend this movie. I think that this movie is a great introduction to New England and the United States. I give this movie a 7 out of 10.

Sunday, 26 Apr 2020 15:41

I have to say I enjoyed this film, but have to say that it left a bad taste in my mouth. I felt it was too long, it was boring and too long it felt like it went on forever. Some of the scenes in the film are not in chronological order, as the dialogue between Pitt and the rabbi seemed to be cut out and scattered about the film. It was like a soap opera. In fact, I was more interested in the characters and their lives and their ideas, than in the dialogue. There was also a large portion of the film where Pitt spoke in Hebrew, which seemed out of place and was not the same language he spoke in the film. I also thought that the film was more focused on the impact of the film and what the film meant, than it was on the men and their experiences. I was interested in their lives and the effects of the Holocaust on their lives, but there was not enough emphasis on the men's stories, nor the effect on their lives. In my opinion, this film was not a film about the Holocaust, but about the impact of the film on the men, rather than the Holocaust itself. Overall, I recommend this film, but I think that it is worth seeing only if you want to see some of the men's lives and stories.

Saturday, 25 Apr 2020 14:11

It is a strange film that I actually found myself to like. The film is a bit over-dramatic at times, but overall it was good. I liked the music in this film, but the film was really all about the characters, and not the music. I felt it was a good film, and I liked the ending.

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 20:23

This is a pretty good film about the discovery of a long lost golden age. It's an action packed and very thrilling movie, but it is nothing like a film like "Crocodile Dundee", which is really, really good. I haven't seen "Crocodile Dundee" but this movie is a little bit like a re-hash of "Dundee" with a good dose of action, good acting, and a strong story. It's very well acted and you actually believe what they are saying. The story is really good and will make you really wonder about the history of the Irish. I would say it is a little bit of a re-hash of "Dundee" but it is still a really good film. This movie is worth watching if you like adventure, action, and good drama. This movie is also a little bit of a remake of a classic movie called "Dundee". This is a very good film and it is a movie that you should definitely see. This is a film that is worth seeing.

Lawrence Hanson

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 14:47

The latest version of the Arthur Miller novel is a bit long and cumbersome and a bit to long for my taste, but it is a good movie. There are no big twists and turns. It is not a masterpiece. It is a nice story, and one that I have watched many times, but I have seen it a few times and not in the same day, but I have seen it again and still I still like it, just like the novel. I give it an 8 out of 10.

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 14:11

A novel by Cormac McCarthy about a drunken Irish poet from the 18th century who manages to get himself into an assassination attempt on the British royal family. It's a very interesting idea, and although it never reaches the literary heights of "The Road" or "The Shining" it's still worth watching. Unfortunately, it's also a really boring film. The reason is that we're constantly being shown all sorts of different locations from the 18th century, with little explanation of what's going on. At first I thought that it was a real world, but then we're shown a black and white screen showing the Irish countryside. And at other points we're shown images from movies, or even real historical events. The idea of depicting the Irish countryside in this way is intriguing, but it's hard to see what the point of it is. It's more a strategy for showing the eccentricities of the characters, but even then it's not really well-used. There are some nice shots of the countryside, but it's all very plain and lifeless. The cinematography is also not very good. There are some good shots of the countryside, but they are shot in the same dull, flat manner that the rest of the film is shot. I also found the soundtrack to be very distracting. It's too much of a musical score, that's used at all sorts of different points in the film. The score never really has any impact on the film, it just makes it look like a school play. I also found the direction to be very poor. It's all very stylised and generic, and there's a lot of long, drawn-out shots of people walking and talking, that are just not engaging. I'm not sure if it's a stylistic choice or if it's just the direction itself, but there's a lot of stuff going on that doesn't work. The whole film is very slow. There are many scenes where we're just listening to the soundtrack, while the characters talk and walk around. There's also some slow scenes that aren't very interesting. I also found the ending to be very unsatisfying. It's very abrupt and abrupt, and I didn't find it to be at all satisfying. I also found the ending to be very disjointed. It's all too sudden and abrupt, and in the middle it just becomes a very disjointed film. There's a lot of different scenes that are left out. The problem with the film is that it just doesn't have anything to offer. There's no tension, no excitement, no emotion. I think that a lot of people who are going to watch this film are going to be disappointed. If you're interested in the novel then you'll probably enjoy it, but I wouldn't recommend it.

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 13:06

In a move that was bound to be controversial, and possibly to be a failure, Spielberg chose to film the film at Orson Welles' home, for a film that was so wildly popular and highly acclaimed. It was the kind of film that would cause a lot of critics to fall over themselves to praise it. But a documentary, by definition, is meant to take the audience inside the film and ask questions about it. The best documentary film is the one that captures the viewer and never lets them go. The best documentary film is The King of Comedy, as it gives you a chance to see how brilliant comedian Dick Gregory was as a performer and comedian. There's also a documentary in the works called The Apostle: How a True Story Became a Musical, which will be shown in March, as a prequel to the film. As a film student, I was thrilled to see how well the film was shot. Most documentaries are shot by the camera man. I think the camera man captures the energy of the film and gives it a documentary feel. I think the director made a good choice to film the film at Welles' home. This is a man who was in a sense his life's work. And he was always so into his films. The film captures the energy that Welles had for the people around him, from the British ministers to the actors, but also the people in his films. And what I liked the most was how well the camera worked. The camera was always close, almost always. It captured the atmosphere of the film. And what I liked most was the camera itself. It was so quiet, almost in a kind of documentary-style. I thought it was like the film was the camera. I also liked the style of the film itself. The film was beautifully shot, but I didn't like that they didn't show Welles' actual house. I think it would have added so much to the film. The film was shot so differently than Welles' other films. I also liked the fact that the film was shot in black and white. It seemed to have the feeling of the time that Welles lived in, and that was great. There's a wonderful scene where Welles is leaving a screening of a play he has just finished. He goes into a room where the theater is black and white. The camera is so close that it feels like we are in the room with Welles. It's a great scene. The film had a good story and was interesting. But I think the film was the wrong choice to do the film at Welles' home. There's so much that could have been done. In addition, the documentary that Spielberg made to accompany the film, for the sake of promoting the film, would have been so much better. I think it would have given the film an entirely different look. I think the film would have been so much more successful, but I don't know. I did like the film, but I'm not sure it's the one I'd recommend.

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 11:46

This is a classic film. It's the story of a group of people who are on a train journey from New York to England. They are travelling with the head of the Union, but this is not the most important part of the story. There are many other important stories that come out of this film. The music is wonderful and the cinematography is so beautiful that I have never been so touched by a film. The film is a masterpiece. It is the greatest film of all time. A great movie that is a true classic.

Brittany Wallace

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 11:06

I loved this film. It is one of the best films I've ever seen. The acting is superb, especially James Woods as the leader of the Puritan community, and the actors who play the others in his community. And the ending is amazing, a touch of irony. I wish I could get the original film, but I don't have the DVD. So, I recommend this movie. I've seen it 3 times now. I think that it is one of the best films of all time.

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 08:32

Eternity's Gate is a true story. I've heard a lot about this film, and it's hard to find a DVD that has it, but it's out there. I saw it in the cinema when it came out, and it really stuck with me. It's a fantastic film, with a great story and great performances. It's like the classic "Singin' in the Rain". There's no doubt about that. The first time I saw it, I thought it was good, but after that I'd have to say that it's one of my favourite films. The characters are very well written, and the story is very interesting. I love the way it's shot, and the way it's put together. I'm sure that this film will be well-received by the people who have seen it. This is definitely one of the best films of the last few years.

See all 29 reviews

Write a review