x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Beuys

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(530) 6.7 107 min 2017

Beuys is a movie starring Joseph Beuys, Caroline Tisdall, and Rhea Thönges-Stringaris. A documentary about the 20th century German sculptor and performance artist Joseph Beuys.

Starring: Rhea Thönges-Stringaris, Franz von der Grinten, Caroline Tisdall, Joseph Beuys

Genres: Documentary

Director: Andres Veiel

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Documentary
Director	Andres Veiel
Writer	Andres Veiel
Stars	Rhea Thönges-Stringaris, Franz von der Grinten, Caroline Tisdall, Joseph Beuys
Country	Germany
Also Known As	Joseph Beuys - Die Revolution sind wir!, ヨーゼフ・ボイスは挑発する, Beuys. Sztuka to rewolucja, Joseph Beuys - kontroversiell ikon
Runtime	1H 47M
Description	A documentary about the 20th century German sculptor and performance artist Joseph Beuys.

Download documentary «Beuys»

Blu-ray
13.6 GB

Customers who watched «Beuys» also watched

22 customer reviews about «Beuys»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Saturday, 27 Jun 2020 08:08

I saw this film at a theatre and it was absolutely worth the trip. It is an all around film. It tells a wonderful story of how a beautiful young girl from the Congo was kidnapped by child smugglers and was taken to Australia and her escape from the confines of the impoverished region. The film is great to watch and is informative. I recommend it to anyone who enjoys documentaries and is interested in Africa.

Wednesday, 24 Jun 2020 17:14

Anyone who is familiar with the political scene in France knows that the current French President Nicolas Sarkozy has always been a favorite target of the right. I have been following this story of Sarkozy and his friend, Prime Minister Pierre Moscovici, since the 1990s, and they have always had a penchant for the dark arts of public relations. The story, so to speak, begins in 2001 when Sarkozy was running for the presidency. The story of how he came to be selected to run in the 2002 election has been told many times. It is not a very popular story that Sarkozy is the President because of his direct association with organized crime. Aided by his friends, Moscovici secured the votes of thousands of French youths, promising to crack down on the criminal activity of the Paris underworld, and then in an apparent attempt to cover up his ties to the underworld, he signed an agreement with the police in 2005 to avoid charges of complicity in the drug trade. The criminal element was indeed organized, but that is not the important part. In reality, it was a result of a series of things that led to the deal. The main ingredient that helped Sarkozy in the election was the number of French youth that he could reach out to, especially youth that were skeptical about the politicians that they thought were corrupt. The problems that he had with the media, his relationships with other political leaders and the families of politicians were among the factors that helped him get elected. The other major factor that helped Sarkozy was the appearance of former high-ranking French officials and some of the people who worked with them on the deal to avoid the charges of complicity in the drug trade. Sarkozy was elected and immediately did what he could to put himself in the center of the drug trade. His press secretary put out a statement that he was going to clean up the streets of Paris, and in one particularly memorable moment in the movie he stands in front of the police station and says, "Do you want to know what we're going to do to clean the streets of Paris?" He took the only big step that he could take, and that was to launch a program that brought hundreds of young people in from the suburbs of Paris. The police and the families of politicians were put under great pressure to push the deal through. The press released a great deal of information on the deal and a great deal of rumors were spread around about it. As Sarkozy became more interested in the job and it was clear that the agreement would not be an easy one, he created a deal to negotiate an agreement with the French Government. At the end of 2004, the deal was made, and Moscovici went to Paris to attend a meeting of the French Government in which the drug deal was presented to the government. He was invited to the meeting, and even though he was a politician, he refused to attend the meeting because of his involvement with organized crime. The other factor that helped Sarkozy was the sheer amount of money that he could gather in his campaign from organized crime, and the money from the drug deal. The drug deal was not the only factor that made Sarkozy the winner of the election. He had been working for years to strengthen his image as a reformer. This was evident in his efforts to crack down on organized crime. He had a program that took young people from the suburbs of Paris, which has a much lower crime rate than the more prosperous suburbs of Paris, and he had set up a program to help those young people find jobs. He had a program to help people become involved in the French labor movement, which has a much lower crime rate than the organized crime in Paris. He had a program to take young people out of the drugs trade. These were all positive efforts. Sarkozy had also been working with the unions to have a high school graduation rate among French youth. In the end, Moscovici was the only politician who was against the deal with the drug deal, and the French left of the political spectrum did not believe that he had been made aware of the deal

Saturday, 20 Jun 2020 13:14

I had the pleasure of seeing this documentary last night at the Toronto International Film Festival. As a German, I was reminded of my own country in the 70's and 80's, with my homeland being the region where my brother lived at the time. I think that both the documentary and the film are very well done, as I believe they help show the reasons for a feeling of belonging to Germany, as well as how that feeling of belonging is more or less suppressed during the transition of the country from the first days of unification to the third-time unification. If you've been in Germany during the transition period, you know how the Germans were torn between their longing for freedom and their desire to feel like part of a European nation. The German cinema was plagued by a lack of content and a lack of content in the form of well known directors, but there were still some great ones in the country. Thus, one of the themes of the documentary was how filmmakers and other artists had to face the difficulty of adapting to the country in which they were working, but also how German cinema was affected by the unification. This was a great documentary that captured very well how the films of the German cinema were affected by the transition, but also how the German cinema has always been somewhat special and has always made the transition from being a mainstream cinema to a very particular one. Overall, I think that the documentary was very good, but I would not compare it to those great films of the German cinema of the 70's and 80's. It was more of a collection of important documentaries that came out during that time. Overall, I would highly recommend this documentary to everyone who wants to know more about Germany and why it was divided into two nations. The documentary definitely will be remembered and I believe it will become a very important reference point in German cinema for years to come.

Wednesday, 17 Jun 2020 22:20

The main story of this film is about a group of South African women who are survivors of apartheid who are now living as full members of the national parishes. These women have different stories to tell, but they all tell the same story: that of the "forsaken", as they are referred to by the white community in this country. It's a story of privilege and oppression, of "white-lives-over-black-lives" mentality, of "softer-than-thou" views of women, and the persistence of these things throughout all of the lives of these women. It's also a story of survival and, yes, the struggle for survival of these women, against all odds, all of their lives, no matter what their personal history. It's an incredibly important film, because it gives us a glimpse into the lives of these women, who are in an incredibly difficult position, and the situation of being persecuted and oppressed for the majority of their lives, without the protection and support of their own communities. What I found most powerful about this film was the fact that the women were willing to go to all the lengths to tell their stories, and this was done not only in a case of survival, but also to show that they have a lot of strengths and wisdom to give to others. If you've ever been in a family with a strong, and strongly-willed father, you'll feel a lot of sympathy for these women, and also a lot of understanding, compassion, and support for their courage and determination. The only reason they are able to hold on to this fight is because of their husbands, or even a relative, who is willing to support them, and to offer the support they need. The film itself is absolutely brilliant, and I have no doubt that it will be one of the most highly-anticipated films of 2014. As a whole, it is incredibly well-crafted and intelligent. It's clear that this is not just another film, but is a great film in its own right. I also believe that it will be one of the best films of 2014, because of how it deals with the issue of apartheid. This film talks about the issue of the effects of segregation, of the consequences of these social attitudes and philosophies on the people of South Africa, and how it is a major problem. It also talks about the fact that there were times in South Africa when the women's liberation movement was "just the beginning" of the struggle for the women's liberation movement in South Africa. It also talks about the different motivations of these women, and their different reasons for going to be in this film. I also think that the film is smart and engaging in its look at the experiences of these women, and the reasons why they decided to go in to make this film. Overall, it's a very powerful film, with a very interesting and entertaining story to tell.

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 09:04

Not the best documentary ever made, but definitely worth a watch for anyone who appreciates real human interest stories. Despite the fact that this documentary is more "in-depth" than "ordinary," it is still entertaining and worth the time and money to see it.

Saturday, 13 Jun 2020 18:19

I knew nothing about Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. before watching this film, which, I feel, was a good thing. I didn't know what to expect going in, I was just interested in seeing a documentary about a great man. The film wasn't on my radar, I'd never heard of it, and the general mood I got from the opening scene was of a casual yet genuine discussion of Dr. King. I never really thought much of Martin Luther King, but I wasn't expecting the movie to be very deep. It wasn't, but it was thoughtful and intriguing. There were some great bits of history, as well as an engaging love story. The filmmaking and editing were very professional, but I feel that the way the film was filmed could have been better. This could be because the film was shot on a digital camera, which had a limited amount of resolution. I think the film could have benefited from a more natural quality of image. This could have helped me in getting the viewer to identify with the characters in the film, and to know how they were feeling. Overall, the film was very professional, but it did have a little too much focus on the lives of the main characters. I felt like there could have been more that could have been added to the film to make it more personal, and less about Dr. King. I was able to identify with Dr. King, and that's why I liked the film. I recommend this film to anyone who is interested in understanding a man, or a movement, that was so important in the history of the world.

Friday, 05 Jun 2020 10:00

I am an Australian film maker, who has recently moved to New York. I went to the film festival with my camera, and found that the audience seemed to be a majority of people who didn't know who I was. I went to the film festival expecting a documentary and it turned out to be a short, interactive film about George Lucas. I was excited to see a film about a man who made his life and career on his film (cinema), and the film proved to be very interesting. I was expecting to see him at the peak of his career and it was quite depressing to see the same story repeated over and over again. However, the story was interesting and his view on life and his films is what was most interesting. This is the first film I've ever seen that actually changed my opinion about George Lucas. I was able to relate to the stories about the great films he made. It is a shame that the film was a 3 hour long documentary, as it had some great stuff, and even with a short running time, I would have loved to have seen more. All the interviews were good and I was glad to see some of the directors talk about how they have been influenced by George Lucas. I will definitely be going to see the next George Lucas film, and I'm not even going to be disappointed. There is a lot of talent and passion in this film and I look forward to seeing what George Lucas comes up with next.

Monday, 01 Jun 2020 23:33

I didn't expect much from this documentary. I knew little about the man or the work he did. It was after all a very small piece of film that I had in my bag. But once I watched it, I was amazed. A very well shot and very well made film. The stories behind the camera are very moving and well told. I have already recommended this film to many people. So if you have a chance to watch it, you will definitely not regret.

Saturday, 30 May 2020 08:47

This film chronicles the development of the band The Dillinger Escape Plan. It's a fascinating and provocative story that spans more than four decades. It was actually filmed in the early 1970s and though it's a very well made film, it is still fairly dated. Nevertheless, it's an interesting look at a band that, like so many, was tragically ripped apart at the end of the 1970s. Despite the sometimes oppressive lighting and the slow pace, this film is very well shot. It's shot in the wide angle camera style that, although it makes the film more difficult to follow, makes it more visually stimulating. Though it's a bit dated, the overall quality of the film makes up for that. The film itself is a bit too long and it's almost unwatchable at times, but the story is engrossing and well told. The cast is mostly well-known. The Dillinger Escape Plan itself is a great story that had to be made. The band's history is covered in great detail. The story is very well told and is gripping. If you're a fan of the band or history, this is a must-see. 8/10

Thursday, 28 May 2020 19:32

At a time when the rights of religion are being used to justify totalitarianism and terrorism, this film offers a good reminder of how religion can also provide a sense of moral and ethical compass. Director Joel Parker (American Beauty) presents a series of interviews with scientists and religious leaders who demonstrate that the mere fact that some believers profess to believe in God does not mean that they believe in a supreme being who created the universe. Dr. Greg Laden (Shawn, World Trade Center) explains that our existence is nothing more than a natural process, and that to deny this would be to deny the fundamental point that life begins with the creation of our universe. Dr. Aimee Desai (Hannah, Titanic) explains that this point has been proven by science, and that even if a person believes in God, there is no need to invoke him as a divine creator. Dr. Willy Cox (Arthur, Mars Needs Moms) agrees, and maintains that even if we do not believe in God, we should recognize that a supreme being is involved in the formation of the universe. Dr. Marty Smith (Thomas, Up in the Air) says that the only truly dangerous thing is ignorance. Religion is a social construct that is used to control society. Dr. Leo Houser (Lewis, Grand Canyon) says that religious belief is a primitive form of behavior control. He also says that religion is a poison, and a source of terror. Dr. Thomas Kincaid (Ed, Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring) concludes that religion is a force that needs to be eliminated, because it has no inherent value and its purpose is to promote intolerance. He says that religion is a factor in the production of hate. Dr. Arie Wiesler (Ariel, Sideways) says that the only reason a person can become religious is through certain stimuli that he or she experiences in life. The religious component of this film, and all other human religions, is about the desire to be accepted as part of the "Other" in life, and to have a sense of belonging. The film shows how that desire can take a person to a place where we believe that we are not the "Other" but part of the "Others" that are in this world. In this regard, religion is a wonderful tool that we should use in our society, because without it, the human race would be doomed to a future devoid of hope. "The Religion of Love" provides a good point of view that most people would be willing to make.

Tuesday, 26 May 2020 04:38

I think this film does a great job of telling the story of the Orange County homeless as they are told by the people who care about them. I thought the documentary would be about the way the homeless are treated in the community, but it is more of a feel good film about what is happening in the community, and how we can change it. I think this film should be considered a must see film to all who are passionate about the homeless problem. We need to have more films like this in the future, showing how it affects our community, and how we can change it. We need to have movies that show the poverty and hopelessness of homeless people, and how this can change you, and help you be successful in your life. We need to see films that show the impact homelessness has on our society, and how we can help each other. I am sure you will have your opinions on this film, but if you love the homeless, and can't help but to be moved by their stories, I recommend this film.

Tuesday, 19 May 2020 09:43

Of all the documentaries in this collection, I think this is my favorite. A few hours of the Hough family history gets you thinking about your own family and your place in the world. It makes you think about the lessons we've learned, and some of the basic lessons of family. It's a shame it only was made in the 1980s, but it's one of the best documentaries of this kind. They even used footage from the birth of their first child to get you thinking about it. This documentary may not be for everyone, but if you can get over the lack of a narrative, and are willing to get to know your family, you should like this one.

Saturday, 09 May 2020 18:06

This movie is actually an interesting story of how a struggling father tries to raise his two young sons in the shadow of his own family. It's a good documentary on the subject of social and economic factors in family life. I really like it. But I also can't help but be skeptical of it's credibility. The first issue I have is that it's an "American film." I'm French and I don't know any other movie like this. If the country in which the film was made is completely different than the country in which it was made, there are probably other ones like this, but not this one. I can't say that it's bad. The film is also directed by one of the most influential French directors of all time, Gilles Jacob. Jacob, born in 1960, has a deep experience in human beings and social issues. He made one of the most important films about the postwar economic crisis of France: L'Academy. But I think it's a good thing that the director is an American, because it might make the viewers in America feel even more, or even more closer to him. Another problem I have with the movie is that the final conclusion of the movie is really unsatisfying. That was something that made me really angry. I had a hard time watching it and didn't understand why. However, I think that the movie is worth watching. It's just a pity that it's not an important movie.

Danielle Hunter

Wednesday, 06 May 2020 01:50

A modest documentary on the work of British philosopher, Paul D. Cohen. It is worth watching for Cohen's ability to go into a depth of thought and life. He is very interesting, and was once called the 'Invisible Philosopher' of the English language. Cohen is one of the most important philosophers of the 20th century, and was interviewed by Richard Brinsley (the great director who did the documentary The Man Who Knew Infinity) for his work in developing the scientific method. Cohen is a very deep thinker and his insight into the world and the human psyche is inspiring. There is also some very moving footage of Cohen playing chess with his son. Cohen died from AIDS at the age of 54. It is quite amazing how a man who had such a profound impact on modern philosophy and was considered one of the great philosophers of our time, had such a peaceful and happy life. Cohen was a man of many contradictions, and was tragically killed by AIDS. It is a shame that a great philosopher was killed so young. I find the interview with Cohen fascinating, and although it does have some things to be critical of, it is also fascinating to see his spirit and his kindness. Cohen was an extraordinary man and a teacher of the philosophy of life. He was able to give advice to people who have nothing else to do, and many people use his philosophy in their lives. For instance, Cohen told his son he should be polite to all people, and then the son started to study etiquette. Cohen was a man who believed in the human spirit and always wanted to learn from people. In an interview with Daniel T. Nelson, Cohen said that the most important thing a person can learn from life is "knowing that you're more than what you're told, and that others can learn from you". He said that his philosophy was that every human being should have a dream, and that the only thing that we can truly learn from another human being is how to become the person he wanted to be. His philosophy is truly inspiring and very important. It is very nice to see a man who had such an impact on so many people. The documentary is a shame that he was killed so young, but it is a reminder that a philosopher still has a lot to learn.

Sunday, 26 Apr 2020 16:01

Katharine Hepburn's career is the subject of this documentary which traces her progress through the most under-appreciated periods of her life. One of her very first films, A Dress to Kill for, is analysed, while her first feature film, A Perfect Husband is discussed and analysed. The film takes a look at Hepburn's early years, with some of the best pictures and best films, before she was in the public eye. The story is very exciting and worth watching.

Sunday, 26 Apr 2020 10:13

It is evident that during this period, British government ministers took some incredible and highly questionable decisions about an environment that was already dead and dying. The above quote is from a 2009 documentary about a decision by the British government to close the last remaining nuclear power station of the world. They have promised to close the station if an environmental impact report on the site's pollution is not delivered by March 2018. The nuclear plant was taken over by the French company Areva, which had been given the power plant by the British government in order to be the third supplier of electricity. It's now one of the most polluting power stations in the world. The plan was to take it over by a consortium of Chinese and French companies, but Areva, backed by the British government decided to leave the nuclear station as a 'public service' to save the government money. Despite the very poor financial situation of the British government, it was willing to take the chance on the worst possible outcome. To my knowledge, there have been no compensation claims for this decision and all that was done was a slight deterioration of the plant. The point of this documentary is that, the British government has been in the business of destroying and lying to the public about the health and environmental effects of nuclear energy for many decades and the Americans are right behind them. The film is interesting and informative. It shows how the British government was able to get control over the final nuclear power station in the world without a proper environmental impact report, and then declared that the decision to shut it down was a public service. In other words, the British government had taken the opportunity to make money without actually doing the right thing, and there was no follow-up to prevent this. The US government was also found guilty of not following any federal environmental standards for nuclear power. It has been reported that the US had a problem with the electricity supply of the entire world, and not only the UK. It was found that the US was involved in the shutting down of several other nuclear power stations. The documentary did not mention this but this was confirmed by the director himself. Another interesting fact was that the French company had never planned to close the plant. In other words, the company had failed to deliver the environmental impact report, and was a private company without any public obligations. The company had been shut down, but in France, the government had taken over the corporation and allowed it to operate for another 5 years.

Steven Schneider

Wednesday, 22 Apr 2020 12:01

Michael Moore does a great job of giving us an overview of his many battles in his campaign for the Presidency of the United States, with clips from his TV shows, documentaries, and TV commercials. There is a great deal of anger from his supporters about the events in the past few years, and the remainder of the documentary does a great job of showing Moore's point of view. While the videos are great and informative, I do have a few issues with Moore. His attacks on Robert F. Kennedy are kind of lame, and I believe they did the same to Ronald Reagan. I also didn't like his attacks on Clinton. His strongest attack is on Nixon. Moore also did a very good job of criticizing Bush, but I don't think he did a good job of criticizing Bush's policies. He does a good job of criticizing Clinton, but that is not much more than one can say about Clinton. Overall, I think Moore did a good job of telling his side of the story, but not much else. The biggest complaint I have is the length of the documentary. It is a little too long, and I think Moore could have used more clips and research to explain his points, but it is still a good documentary.

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 12:17

Mixed emotions. I expected this to be a documentary but it isn't. It's a review. So I was disappointed. I really enjoyed this film and I would recommend it to others. However, the end was a little disappointing. It's a good thing the film was short so they didn't want to overstay their welcome. Also, I have a feeling that this film was much better before the end credits were rolled. I just wish the movie would have finished. That said, the film is worth seeing and you should see it. It is a very thought provoking film. And you will leave the theatre feeling that there is a lot of important stuff to be discussed. In addition, I have to say that I really liked the way that the film was filmed. The cinematography is beautiful. It's worth seeing.

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 11:49

I love this documentary. It's really hard to find and I have a hard time getting my hands on it, but I'm glad I found it. This movie is well-made. It really does have a lot to say about why the market for human products is so screwed up. There are a lot of actors and documentaries I could see the same thing for, but that's not what makes this film so good. It's the way it's presented. It's a combination of interviews with scientists, people who actually know something about the product that makes the difference between a documentary about a product and a movie about the product. It's really nice to see these people who are so good at what they do. They really make you think about the "things" they do, and that's a great way to learn about them.

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 09:19

This documentary explores the history of America's immigrant labor, focusing on the hard-fought legal battle of the Larkin Line, a once ubiquitous rail-to-trailer transportation system for moving commodities throughout the United States. It is narrated by the very actor who plays Roy Cohn. The film is all the more valuable as it is largely un-credited, meaning that people who have never had any knowledge of the story are unable to follow the story. However, it is a fascinating documentary that will leave you with a lot to think about. As someone who has been lucky enough to be able to work in this field and to see the world through the eyes of those who were at the cutting edge of this world, I found this film to be very insightful and educational.

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 08:39

Paul Meegan (UK) is an American filmmaker, and as such is a specialist in the business of film-making. Like Werner Herzog, he also made movies about the subject of The Holocaust. This documentary is an inside look at Paul Meegan's film-making. It is not an insider's view of Meegan's work. There is no way to say for sure what was on the screen, but we can certainly say that the focus of the film is a fascinating, insightful study of Meegan's artistic process. We see Meegan taking small, medium, and large shots of the same scene. We see him shooting his actors and using them in the same frame. We see him cutting and splicing his film, changing scenes as he goes. We see him showing a rough cut of his work to an actor who will play his main character. We see Meegan explaining the logic of his work to a director who has a great deal of respect for him. The story of the making of an amazing film that was the first American feature film of the year was as intriguing as any in this documentary. Meegan reveals that he is a perfectionist, and in that aspect he is the best documentary filmmaker ever. If you like this sort of thing, then you should also be a fan of Werner Herzog, as he is the main subject of the film. This is the sort of thing that you should watch. If you don't like it, then you should probably be pretty high-strung and non-enlightened.

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 03:55

A review of this film is in the same vein as one of his other films.I feel, that the audience would benefit from viewing this film at least twice.I am not convinced that it is a great film, but it is very interesting and enjoyable to watch.If you are the type who enjoys documentaries, then you will be pleased to know that the film contains a few good documentaries and some films from the 1930's and 1940's.The film has many points that the audience can use to learn about the world, but the key for most people is that they can relate to the actors, the stories, and the views expressed in this film.If you like documentaries, then you should watch this film.

See all 22 reviews

Write a review