x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Unlocking the Cage

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(499) 6.9 91 min 2016

Unlocking the Cage is a movie starring Steven M. Wise. Between 2013 and 2015, a group of nonprofit attorneys seek nonhuman clients for whom they can advocate in two U.S. territories, in order to establish legal personhood for...

Starring: Steven M. Wise

Genres: Drama, History, News, Documentary

Director: D.A. Pennebaker, Chris Hegedus

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Drama, History, News, Documentary
Director	D.A. Pennebaker, Chris Hegedus
Stars	Steven M. Wise
Country	USA
Also Known As	Öppna burarna!, L'avocat des chimpanzés, Raus aus dem Käfig - Der Kampf des Steve Wise
Runtime	1H 31M
Description	Follows animal rights lawyer Steven Wise in his unprecedented challenge to break down the legal wall that separates animals from humans, by filing the first lawsuits that seek to transform a chimpanzee from a 'thing' with no rights to a 'person' with legal protections.

Download drama «Unlocking the Cage»

Blu-ray
13.44 GB

Windows
5.14 GB

Customers who watched news «Unlocking the Cage» also watched

26 customer reviews about history «Unlocking the Cage»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Carolyn Cunningham

Wednesday, 01 Jul 2020 06:10

This documentary was good at providing a background story of the World Trade Center tragedy and the resulting efforts by U.S. and U.N. government officials to secure and unlock the "mystery" around that event, and to ensure that the full story would be told. But, it did not give a full explanation of what exactly happened that day on September 11, 2001. For example, it did not explain why one of the hijackers turned out to be Al Qaeda's leader, and why he was allowed to remain on U.S. soil. For that, I would recommend watching the movie "Museum Hours," by the same director of this documentary, Eric Schlosser.

Melissa Aguilar

Thursday, 25 Jun 2020 18:42

This documentary was interesting in that it covers so much ground without giving a straight answer. However, there were some very good ideas that didn't get captured on film. It felt like they needed more time to really flesh out these ideas. For instance, they touched on what money does to the psyche and what it can do to the way we see things. A lot of the interviews were on video, and that's good because it provides the viewer with the ability to decide for themselves if they like these ideas or not. Overall, it was a good documentary that could have been better. I'll give it a 7 out of 10.

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 08:53

I think this is a great film and I liked the movie. What did I like about it? Well I liked the fact that the makers were able to mix realism and fiction in the same shot. What was funny is that the documentary makers have done a fantastic job showing the historical and cultural aspects of this tale of life in a lonely jail. I like that they show how John Wayne's character was able to get away with the things that were done to him. The documentary director also did an amazing job of showing how inmates were brought up and how they were taught to behave. The audience who watches this film will see how much courage this man had to fight his jailers and overcome the odds and how they get what they deserve. I also like how they did a great job of telling the story from the inside. They showed how inmates were treated as they were being pushed to the limit. This is one of the best documentaries I've ever seen. If you're going to watch it I suggest that you watch it in the dark and don't look at the lights.

Friday, 12 Jun 2020 10:40

After this little film I had to watch it again. And it was just as I remember it from 1982. For one thing it has been rated PG-13 in the US, but in Europe it was R. Another thing that you get when you watch it is a feeling that you are just as much the viewer as the researcher. So many references that you don't even notice the parallels between this film and the recent film "The Revenant" (that I recently saw), for instance, or even the old film "A Serbian Film" that I saw years ago. There are some awesome clips from the film like the ones I mentioned. And this isn't just to compare. In some parts you get really heated debates about religion and politics. There is so much that is left unexplained in the film and it is all through research, for example, that is where the climax of the film is and I don't believe that the filmmakers are trying to hide that. You are just as much a participant in the debate as the researcher and I think that's what makes this so important.

Friday, 12 Jun 2020 06:13

As a fan of the game, I was looking forward to this documentary, but I was a little disappointed. It was a good story, but I wish there had been more footage. The film is an inside look at the game, but it could have been a little more in-depth.

Wednesday, 10 Jun 2020 21:25

In the field of archaeology, the proper term is "archaeology", not "archaeology" or "archaeology" (aka "Archaeology"). It is really a sub-genre of the same, which involves the investigation of ancient artifacts and other evidence. But it isn't archaeological sites or evidence, but archaeological findings, which are actual evidence that a site was/is, which were discovered by ancient cultures or other civilizations. For example, you can have a case of "heiligte Cropen" (Pierced ear), which was a headdress worn by the Greco-Roman people of Upper Silesia in Europe, Germany and parts of Italy. It was supposedly used by the Romans to look down on non-Greco-Roman women, and by the Jews in Medieval times, for the same reason. The term "heiligte Cropen" comes from "hellebolte" (or "hellebolte", depending on where you look), the name of the original headdress used by the Romans. But the actual headdress wasn't shaped like a toothed comb, but was slightly shaped like a beehive (hence the Latin name) and it was mainly made of metal, but it had triangular, flat, pointed, and stylized circular projections. Because of that, the Romans would put the headdress on a person to look down on them, and it's how we know that it was the symbol of a woman's submission and that it represented their submission. And that is a good summary of the entire topic of archaeology. The actual historical and archaeological questions raised by this documentary and its production are relatively trivial, but these are mostly quite interesting questions. But that doesn't mean it's not interesting, because it really is. What can I say about this documentary? I haven't seen a documentary like this before. It is very engaging, and you can tell that the people who made it care about their subjects and their subject is the Roman Empire. It is also interesting because of the fact that it touches on a very interesting topic that you have probably never heard about. It's interesting because Roman and pre-Roman Europe was a society with very high intelligence, both intellectually and culturally. Because of this, there is a lot of documentation on this topic. It is quite possible that the reasons for this could be a form of bigotry, because people might not like the idea of a society where people did not look down on other people because of what they looked like. But that's just my opinion. But the thing that I most enjoyed about the documentary is that there were no special effects. It wasn't a big special effects budget, but it was an interesting documentary, and I really enjoyed it because of that. But also, it is very interesting because it brings a lot of important and interesting questions to the viewers. But I also felt that the subjects of the documentary, even though they were at an important age and very young when this was made, were still rather immature, which makes it somewhat more interesting, but still quite immature, since it isn't really an adult documentary, which means it is made for a younger audience. The documentary has a very interesting tone, the people in it are very interesting and they have a good feel for the subject, and it is nice to hear the voices of people of that age and their voices, which is good for us as a viewer. However, the documentary isn't really very deep. I don't think that the subjects had any specific goal, so they might as well just focus on the topics that interested them. And it seems like it could be more interesting if they had more specific questions to answer, because it would be more interesting for them. Because of this, it also felt like I was going to learn a lot more, but I was only able to get a very basic idea of what was going on. This documentary is a very interesting one, but you

Monday, 08 Jun 2020 12:28

Over the last several years, we have witnessed a rise in the number of documentaries of varying levels of quality. The tone of many of these documentaries ranges from what may appear to be biased "I'm-a-nice-guy" portrayals to a sort of gritty, almost documentary-like storytelling. One documentary that most recently moved me to this opinion is, "Eating Magic". Though this is an average documentary, it is certainly one that is well done. The documentary is structured, and has good visual style, and does a good job at helping the audience identify with the subjects of the documentary. While I generally do not like documentaries that are long, and contain an all-star cast of actors and actors, this is not one of those. The actors in the film, at least, are not well known actors and I didn't feel that they were trying to make the audience care about them, nor did I feel that they were over-dramatic or anything like that. This may have had an impact on the rating on IMDb, as some of the actors would have been considered one-dimensional, but I think it was the right decision. Most of the interviews are with persons who are famous and famous people. While this may not be as good as documentaries of famous people, it is a nice change of pace from the usual documentaries that we see, and I think it would be a good documentary to watch for a good laugh. The documentary was well done, and very entertaining. It is not something I would consider to be a masterpiece, but I do believe it was an entertaining documentary. Not a masterpiece, but I did enjoy this documentary.

Monday, 08 Jun 2020 06:31

I think that "La Vie Boheme" is one of the most underrated films in the French New Wave. It's not a "Great" movie, but it's an amazingly creative and witty satire of the movies, life and art. It also shows the importance of films, and that in France the films are a "cult." The film itself is excellent, and the editing is superb. It's also beautiful to look at, even if the nudity isn't always present. It's also quite violent, so if you're not comfortable with violence, avoid it at all costs. It's a really great look into the French New Wave, and I highly recommend it. I really do hope that "L'Uomo Noir" becomes more widely known. If you're interested in the French New Wave, this is a great film to watch.

Saturday, 06 Jun 2020 17:16

I think it's a great story, there are just a few problems that stand out. 1. These "archaic" methods of "locking the cage" were not very common among most of the scholars who performed these procedures, even if the stories were supposedly authentic. 2. It is not clear whether these devices were to keep the vengeful "ghosts" at bay or to kill them outright, it is also not clear whether the historians who conducted these experiments were aware of these issues. 3. It seems as though this method was more prevalent among the elites, because in most of the accounts of these experiments, these "ghosts" have only been able to survive one life, a fairly few such women survive multiple consecutive resurrections. In other words, these experiments were not a "mainstream" method of medicine, they were more like torture. If these people were "impure", why do they act as if they were healthy in other accounts? 4. Many of the accounts were written by the "experimenters", they seem to have gotten permission to perform these experiments. So it seems as though the accounts are "fictions", so to speak. I really recommend this film, but the story is also pretty "out there". 7/10

Jacqueline Bowman

Wednesday, 03 Jun 2020 01:00

In a world where there is so much shit to see, where nothing is as important as your history, where the vision of the world is so complex, it is a rare sight to find films that are as clever, as insightful and as poignant as this. The problem is that the film is at times too long and too deliberate. It also goes on a bit too long and too deliberate and never really manages to take its full effect. It is not a story of a war that was a result of modern war and our inability to understand it, but of a war that has been passed down, through generations and a thousand years of history, that we are unable to take apart. It is something else, something that is never really explained, something that needs to be told. It is this that is the real problem with the film. While the pictures are all stunning and moving, it never lets go of the real reason for this film. This is something that is trying to tell us something, and the way the film does this is with a series of questions that we are asked. These questions are not really answers, they are only speculation. Yet the answers are tantalising, compelling and full of life. By the end of the film, the only real question is how far we have come.

Patrick Griffin

Tuesday, 02 Jun 2020 19:04

It was a very interesting documentary and it certainly made the experience of film studies class interesting. However, I would have preferred to see more information on the historical events of which I am a little bit familiar, as I think the narrative flow of the movie was a little bit uneven. I really didn't feel much like the lecturer in class, and the movie felt too long for the first half hour, where I was not sure what the professor was trying to do. For example, he talks about how the movie is based on a true story, but the first half hour doesn't give you much information about how the real story was structured. There was also too much emphasis on the Vietnam War in this movie. At the same time, it's interesting to see how they talked about the famous artifacts that were made in Vietnam. The movie was very visually interesting and in the first part it did an excellent job of bringing out the environment of the country. However, I felt that the movie needed more information about the actual events of the Vietnam War. I think they missed the point of the Vietnam War a little bit. Also, I think they also missed the point that it was not about fighting for the United States, but about fighting for freedom.

Sunday, 31 May 2020 10:06

A personal note, I do not know if this is what the producers were hoping for, but it does look like an hour and a half long documentary. It seems like they just filmed all of the interviews they had for each cast member and then cut them together to make a one hour film. And it just seems like there is too much footage being shown for a documentary. For a cast list, I can understand that the cast is always going to be a little bit bigger in the "official" interviews. But it is just annoying when they are just showing up to the cameras and never really doing any interviews themselves. So much footage just showing off some of the cast for no reason other than to show off their coolness. That's why this should have been an hour and a half documentary instead of just a few short clips showing off the actors.

Wednesday, 27 May 2020 11:54

Filmmaker and film critic Fred Lewis made this documentary for The Washington Post about the fall of the Berlin Wall. He interviewed a variety of people, including President George W. Bush, current President of Ukraine, and other luminaries in the area of Berlin. And though I never heard of George W. Bush, I think he's one of the most charismatic presidents of modern times. So I appreciate his views on the future of the United States and the success of President Barack Obama's actions. The problem with this documentary is that there's little time devoted to showing Bush, and that's a huge problem because we all want to know how the United States handled the Berlin Wall. We don't want to hear how it happened, we just want to know what happened. The film doesn't really focus on the role of the Bush Administration, instead it focuses on how the situation changed over the years. There's no detailed conversation with Bush himself, just interviews with Bush's aides and advisers. It's a shame, because there's much more to the story than just what happened at the Wall, there are many questions that need to be asked. Like why didn't the North Koreans allow the Germans to cross the border? Why did Bush do nothing about the refugees pouring out of East Germany? And why did the United States not respond when President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt was assassinated by the Muslim Brotherhood in Cairo? One thing that I don't understand is the film seems to give the impression that if the U.S. had acted differently, the Germans would have been able to maintain their capitalist economic system and there wouldn't be this lesson to be learned about how to approach a dictatorship. One thing I think this film should have done is to focus more on the reasons why the Berlin Wall came down and why it happened in the first place. As a filmmaker, you should at least try to show why things happened. You don't need to spend the entire film trying to convince the audience that Bush was right. But if you want to talk about the reasons why the Berlin Wall came down, that's where you should start. And that's what I think this documentary was built around.

Monday, 25 May 2020 22:38

I am a huge fan of the first movie, so naturally I wanted to see the sequel, and hopefully enjoy it as much as I did the first. The story is no great shakes, but I thought it was very well told and had a great story arc for the characters. It has some really good information to the plot of the first movie that was not explored in the first. The fact that the main character is the king is an amazing part to the plot, and I think was an important part of the second. There were a lot of good things about this movie. It is definitely worth watching. It definitely has a good story, good effects, and good acting. Also, the people behind the movie did a great job on this film. My only complaint is that there were a lot of things I wanted to see more of, like the flying monkeys. They are really cool, but also kind of made the movie feel a little rushed. Overall, I really liked this movie, and I would definitely recommend it to anyone.

Monday, 25 May 2020 16:42

The first half of "The Curse of the White Monkey" is an interesting documentary, trying to tell us about the background and origins of the "Monkey Queen" cult. One of the most fascinating parts is the conversation between filmmaker and former Monkey Queen, Anna Sui, which has the quality of the awkward conversations you would have when you know something you don't. They also talked about the huge effort of the directors to bring the story to the big screen, in a way they were proud of. The film also goes into detail about the parties, the disturbing and sadistic methods used by the cult members and the total depravity. The second half is a bit too self-indulgent, the story and history is barely touched on, while the final question of the documentary is not answered. The people who make a film on these things don't have a lot of freedom to talk about them. This film is at the point of feeling a bit uneven, like the second half was left out and the first half was cut down to a mere 30 minutes.

Saturday, 23 May 2020 07:44

The movie is really good and worth watching, it's a great way to see how Israel deals with the problem of immigration from Africa, because most of the people that arrive in Israel are from sub-Saharan Africa and because of the huge problem with birth rates and lack of social services in Africa, immigration from the former colonies from Africa is a very real and very serious problem in Africa. But it's not just about the natural population growth and the growth of the African population. There is an extra problem, which is the illegal immigration from Africa, where the economic condition is completely different from the one in Israel. The problem of immigration from Africa is that they want to get a job in Israel. The problem of the illegal immigrants from Africa is that they want to stay in Africa. So this movie shows you what happens when people from Africa come to Israel, and what happens when they arrive in Israel. What the movie does not show you, is the reason for the illegal immigration from Africa, because it's a very hard thing to explain. So the movie shows the question of why the people from Africa come to Israel. And it shows you how they are treated in Israel. So it is a very good movie, and I would say that the movie is the most comprehensive movie about Israel that I've ever seen.

Tuesday, 19 May 2020 09:32

A documentary about the life of British military veteran Bobby Sands. The story is told of Sands' life in his own words and through archival footage from various sources. We get the true events behind his many tortures, and are also given a look at the place of the British soldiers in the history of the British Empire. While the story is about Sands, it is also a look at how the British became famous for their brutally, brutal, and manly style of war, and how the British soldiers became the heroes of World War II. There are many war related images shown in this documentary, which is very good to see and is a great insight to the power and role of the British soldiers in World War II. The problem with the documentary is that the documentary lacks that element of the telling of the story. It is very slow, and doesn't really leave a lasting impression. The truth of the story is really far away from the documentary, and it is hard to believe how Sands was a legend in the British military, and how he managed to get away with torturing American soldiers, and to get away with being hailed as a hero.

Thursday, 07 May 2020 09:06

I watched the movie with an open mind and the whole idea that a western president who thinks that he is a local hero and people in France who admire him without seeing his past work as an explorer and so on, is indeed a brave and honourable man is a fascinating idea, however the documentary does not show the real story about the key players who played a key role in the whole process, and I believe that to be something more interesting and important than a documentary. All in all a good movie, not only for those interested in a book about the french revolution. 7/10

Sunday, 03 May 2020 06:25

I enjoyed this documentary very much. It is very well done, and it gives a very accurate look at the plight of the Japanese in WW2. However, this documentary is not about the Japanese, but the Japanese on the other side of the Pacific. There is no such thing as a Japanese, or an American. The Japanese were the enemy, and the Americans were the allies. This is the basis of the film, and it is a very good one. It is also the reason why the film is so important. It is important to know the Japanese and their culture. Also, it is important to know the Japanese point of view about the war. If you can't do that, you will be confused and will not understand the film. The story of the Japanese in WW2 is very important, and this film is very well done. I highly recommend this documentary.

Sunday, 03 May 2020 04:57

An excellent look at the subject matter of the abuse and the hysteria it has generated. It shows that no-one should be prosecuted for this case and, most importantly, that the abuse is not only the fault of the abuser but, crucially, of society at large. The documentary is compelling and the findings have the power to force those who were in the organisation to confront what they are and what they have become.

Laura Fernandez

Friday, 24 Apr 2020 22:07

I really enjoyed this documentary. It was very well-made, and it was interesting to see a side of the human condition that I had never heard about. I enjoyed it very much. The best part was seeing the reaction of the student protesters, which was very interesting. The students, mostly African American, were very passionate about their cause, and it was great to see how they reacted. There was a lot of humor in the film, and I found myself laughing out loud at some parts. I also enjoyed the actors and the director's choice of music. Overall, I think this film is a must-see for anyone interested in the history of the civil rights movement. It is very well-made and will give you a new perspective on the events of the 1960's.

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 19:26

This is an excellent documentary that I thoroughly enjoyed. Despite its limited length, it kept me engaged and interested throughout. If you're a fan of documentary, you'll enjoy this.

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 15:50

The film "Unlocking the Cage" is a documentary about a truck driver who was convicted of killing his wife and her friends. The movie is set in Peru, in a small town. The movie is really pretty accurate about the way life was in Peru before the high poverty rate. In the film, it gives a good insight about the community's life. The film also gives a little insight about the trailer of the movie. It's not a Hollywood type movie. It's a documentary. The director used his audience to see the pain and suffering the people in the community had to go through. It was very realistic. It was good to see how the people in the community worked to make it through the poverty. There was also a lot of religious beliefs, not because they were religious. They believed that they needed to work to earn money and to earn a better life. They didn't feel comfortable with the authorities to do things to get the money. The director was also smart enough to not only show the people's life, but also his life. He wanted to show that there are also many types of people in the community. He did it in a way that the audience can't see the guilt the people feel. This was a very good documentary.

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 14:32

Forget what the people who see this movie are saying. You will be disappointed. The purpose of this film is to present the dangers and difficulties associated with obtaining a top notch degree, that can make it easy to easily obtain a large amount of money at the expense of the education of the student. The documentary doesn't delve into the reasons for the degree seeking. It doesn't even discuss whether the person has any legitimate reasons for wanting a high paying job. In other words, this documentary shows what is, in reality, nothing more than an average college student wanting a degree in some good things. The main difference between the two is that some people are willing to put themselves through that pain. That is the price one pays for a degree. The director did a great job of showing the danger that a well paid college degree is. It is something that is worth spending money on. The director doesn't even go into the benefits of a high paying job. This documentary is not a documentary that will change anyone's life or knowledge of anything. It is a video meant to give a quick view into the job opportunities that a degree can offer. The directors did a great job at telling the story of this documentary and giving us a general idea of what it is like to have a college degree and go into a field that is beyond your grasp. The directors did a great job at showing how to get a degree and how to work toward it. The documentary is informative and it will get you interested in learning more about what a college degree is and how to achieve it. I enjoyed this movie very much and it was definitely worth my time. I believe that everyone should see this documentary. This is not something that is easy to do and the director did an outstanding job of making this documentary even more informative.

Brittany Jenkins

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 05:32

The people in this documentary do a great job. I had the opportunity to interview and watch a few of them, and they were all very entertaining. However, I was disappointed with the lack of the other people. The way the interviews were done, I felt they were almost too quick, and it made it very hard to follow. I felt that the way they used clips of the other people was much more interesting, and it would have made the documentaries much more interesting. I am glad that there are people like those interviewed, but I think they should have made it a little longer to cover the other people's stories.

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 02:44

This is a great documentary, but I can't help but feel that it's a bit too short. It feels like it's been cut down to a 2 hour movie. That's not a bad thing, but it makes it feel a little rushed. There is still a lot of great stuff to cover in the movie, but it's a little too short. It's also got some very interesting interviews with the people involved in the film, which I think are very interesting. I'd recommend this to anyone who loves the music, and people who are interested in the music. It's definitely a must-see for any music fan.

See all 26 reviews

Write a review