x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch A Private War

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(14098) 6.7 110 min 2018

A Private War is a movie starring Rosamund Pike, Alexandra Moen, and Tom Hollander. One of the most celebrated war correspondents of our time, Marie Colvin is an utterly fearless and rebellious spirit, driven to the frontline of...

Starring: Tom Hollander, Faye Marsay, Alexandra Moen, Rosamund Pike

Genres: Drama, Biography, War

Director: Matthew Heineman

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Drama, Biography, War
Director	Matthew Heineman
Writer	Arash Amel, Marie Brenner
Stars	Tom Hollander, Faye Marsay, Alexandra Moen, Rosamund Pike
Country	UK, USA
Also Known As	Moj lični rat, 私人戰爭, Moj Osobni Rat, Uma Guerra Pessoal, Ο δικός της πόλεμος, プライベート・ウォー, Una guerra privada, Marie Colvin, Prywatna wojna, La corresponsal, Milkhama Pratit
Runtime	1H 50M
Description	One of the most celebrated war correspondents of our time, Marie Colvin is an utterly fearless and rebellious spirit, driven to the frontline of conflicts across the globe to give voice to the voiceless.

Download drama «A Private War»

Blu-ray
13.63 GB

Windows
5.33 GB

Customers who watched war «A Private War» also watched

31 customer reviews about biography «A Private War»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Saturday, 20 Jun 2020 13:48

A Private War is a movie which is meant to be viewed with a non-political lens. In the film, Captain Nick Parkes (Tom Hardy) is an Australian private in the Australian Military. He is in the Australian Army in World War 2 and is sent to fight in the French and Indian War. He is part of the Royal Australian Air Force and is fighting in Burma. He is not a war hero, but he does show great courage and shows that he is more of a soldier than a hero. He also shows great personal bravery. When he is captured by the Japanese, he is rescued by the Indian and French soldiers and then he goes back to Australia. He is then a colonel and works as a translator. The film shows his life in Australia. The story is good and the film is well-made. The acting is good and the directing is good. The film is good and is worth seeing. The only reason I am giving it an 8 instead of a 10 is that it does show some things which are very sensitive. I don't think it is a film to show sensitive things. I think it is a film to show a very good life and shows a lot of courage. The film is well-made and I give it an 8. I recommend it to anyone who is interested in Australian history.

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 09:39

This film is a powerful indictment of the nature of war and its impact on the human psyche. It is not easy to see what was going on in these people's minds, and how they would deal with such a war. The film is filled with unforgettable images. The first image of the movie is of a tiny man running in the middle of the desert. The man was a young boy, and he was carrying a cross that he had made out of a piece of metal. It was the only sign of humanity in this little boy. The man's name was Robert Ford, and he was one of the youngest men to join the British Army in the late 19th century. The war against the Germans was in the minds of the British, but not the Germans. The Germans were not people to be feared. They were monsters. They were animals that had no conscience, and they did not have any idea of human emotions. They thought that the war was a good thing, and that war was an exciting game. But it was not. It was a terrifying, terrifying game. The Germans were completely ruthless. They took no prisoners, and they had no conscience. It was impossible to predict how they would behave, and it was easy to predict how they would kill. There was no way to tell them what to do. The British soldiers were completely defenseless. They had no idea what to do. The film shows that the British soldiers, and especially the soldiers who went to India, did not want to fight, but were made to fight. They were completely unprepared for what they were about to see. The film shows the emotions of the soldiers and the children who witnessed the war. It shows how much the soldiers and the children loved each other, and how sad it was to see how much they were loved. The film shows the soldiers as people, and not as monsters. The soldiers were very well portrayed by the actors. I was very moved by the movie. It is a very important film, and a very moving one.

Tuesday, 09 Jun 2020 01:18

This was a good movie. It did a good job of showing what happened in Vietnam and the way that the country was put together. However, I feel like the movie could have done a lot more to show how the people felt about the war and how the young people of Vietnam were very proud of the war. They were proud to be American and proud to have been in the war. It didn't show the psychological reasons that the Vietnamese people were fighting the war and why they were fighting the war. It did show the military aspects of the war and how the soldiers had to fight to stay alive. The movie didn't really give me a feel of what war was like on the other side of the water. If the movie had been more detailed and showed what war was really like, it would have been a great movie. Overall, I would give this movie a 7.5/10.

Sunday, 07 Jun 2020 17:59

In the time of the Vietnam War, Robert DeNiro has the same role as he played in "Pulp Fiction", the role of Sgt. Jesse James "Jack" Brewster. Here he plays a soldier named Darry. The film tells the story of how he becomes involved with the Korean War, and why he does it. There are some very powerful scenes of war, especially the scene where Jesse James gives a statement to a police officer. Overall the film is well done and tells the story of how Robert DeNiro became involved in the Vietnam War. I think the film does a good job of showing the realities of war, and showing the differences between the two countries. It shows both the good and the bad side of war. It also shows the life of the soldiers and their struggle in the war, and how they see the Americans as the aggressors, and the Viet Cong as the victims. I really liked this film, and I think it is one of the better war films that has been made in the past few years. I give the film a 7 out of 10.

Jennifer Jackson

Saturday, 06 Jun 2020 23:59

The one thing that I really didn't like about the film was the way it was shot. I like how it was filmed, and it was beautifully shot, but it just seemed to me like the camera was going into the dirt and it was not like I was in the dirt, I was actually watching the camera, and it just seemed like I was watching a camera. But it was the way that they shot the film that made it a great film. It was a great film, it was really a good film. It's a really good film, I recommend it to anyone who likes war films, because it's a really good film.

Friday, 05 Jun 2020 09:02

I watched this movie over two years ago. I remember feeling slightly embarrassed about myself when I was about 17 or 18 and I was watching this movie and realized that I was more embarrassed by the fact that I had watched it that long then I was about to admit that I was actually a good movie-going person. I don't really know why that is. The movie really didn't do anything for me other than make me think about what was happening in the world around me, and that made me really appreciate the importance of what I was watching. I think this movie is a good movie to watch if you feel the same way that I do about the world around us.

Friday, 05 Jun 2020 03:05

I think the same applies to this film. It's a remarkable story. The importance of this war is well and truly acknowledged in the film. However, I think the film could have been better written. Not that it's a bad film, it's simply not very well written. I do think, however, that the portrayal of the war is well portrayed. The film, I feel, is good enough for people of all ages, and is certainly not too mature for some viewers.

Sunday, 31 May 2020 22:56

What is the purpose of this film? To remind us of what we did to the Japanese in WWII, but also to show how terrible it was and how precious life is. People should not forget about that and how it affected their lives. The film could have been a nice re-telling of the events but I felt the way it was filmed was a bit boring and there were many parts where I wanted to fast forward the movie to the end. I guess this is how they portrayed the war. But this is not what I want to see. I would have liked to have seen a lot more of the Japanese characters as well as the US troops who fought with them. I also wanted to see the horrific attacks on Tokyo, the firebombing of it and what was happening at the time. The film was very depressing, but it was very well made. It showed both sides of the war and did not show much hate. The last part of the film was very interesting and exciting and I wish they had done more about the Japanese troops as well as the Americans. The movie is worth seeing if you want to see a good retelling of the war.

Saturday, 30 May 2020 15:38

All these years later and now I have decided to watch this movie. I am not surprised that it was so well received because it is a film about war and that is what war is about. It is a story about two individuals and their views on the war. They are both men but they are also brothers and I think this film captured the spirit of what war is really about. The only thing I would change is that they do not get to the beach at the end but that is not really a complaint because the film is about people that do not get to the beach at the end. It was a sad film but it captured the spirit of the war. It was beautifully made and was a film that should be watched by everyone. It is a story about war and that is what war is about.

Thursday, 28 May 2020 00:43

Robert Redford is a strong and likable actor. He has been praised for his performances in certain films such as Star Wars and Saving Private Ryan. With this film, he takes a role in which he plays a man who appears to be the most memorable of all his characters. The film also focuses on his love affair with Gwyneth Paltrow and his struggle to hide the fact that he was homosexual. I have seen the film twice and am now working my way through it. I think that it's a great movie and worth seeing. It's very hard to find films that work on so many levels. In addition to being a historical film and a biography of Robert Redford, it's also a great film for any viewer who wants to see a bit more of a comedy. I'm not sure if I'm going to buy this movie, but I'm sure that I'll be seeing it many times. My rating: 7/10

Tuesday, 26 May 2020 17:25

I just saw this film last night and I must say I was really impressed. I am not a big fan of war films at all but I do have to admit that I have never really seen the ones from WWII. I do however love war films, the best of the best and of the best of the best and this film was truly one of the best war films of all time. The story is very well told and the cinematography is superb. The acting is great also. Kevin Costner does a great job playing the ex-USMC captain he played in his previous film S.O.B and Robin Williams has never been better. The only real problem I have with the film is the story itself. I believe the book on which this film was based is much better than the film and I think they should have done the same. The story is so slow and boring and all I could think of was how could they ever end this thing and I am glad they didn't. I have not read the book and I cannot comment on it. I recommend this film to anyone who loves war films and I can promise you that you will not be disappointed.

Monday, 25 May 2020 04:10

The idea behind this film was pretty original and I have to say that I liked it a lot. The plot was a little bit long but I think that it was not the film's fault but rather the actors'. They were very good and the film ended on a high note. The film's idea was good but some of the choices it made was a bit too extreme and didn't match up with reality. For example, why would a government soldier with a romantic relationship with a German woman, would he risk his life and liberty for a German woman? It would be better to go back to England or France to save his family but he still had to fight and die for the German woman. I have heard that the film has had a lot of negative reaction from the German government and I am not surprised as the film's story was not good. I would have liked the film to have been more realistic in it's execution and make it a better film.

Wednesday, 13 May 2020 03:35

DAMN! THAT'S A LOT OF TALK ABOUT THIS MOVIE. I, for one, am not a fan of either Clint Eastwood or Joseph S. DeMilo. This is one of his worst films. Not because he's not a good actor. I think he's a great actor, he just doesn't know how to play his character. The man is just a slumming mercenary and even when he's wearing a suit and saying stuff like, "Now it's your turn," he still fails. The way he says it, it's like he's saying it to himself. I'd be shocked if he was a soldier. But he's the same guy he's always been. This is just his preening and strutting around. That's the problem. The movie does have a lot of plot twists. You just don't know which one is coming, and it makes the movie drag. The movie also suffers from some of the same problems as P.T. Anderson's "Rocky" movies. The characters are either pretty shallow or they are just terrible. There is also a lot of talk about the Vietnam War, which is never really explained. A lot of the people in the movie are hippies and it's not clear what their point is, which doesn't help. If you are interested in Vietnam and don't want to watch a movie about it, then I can recommend "The Deer Hunter." In fact, I highly recommend "The Deer Hunter" if you have an interest in Vietnam, because that is a far better movie about Vietnam than this. This is one of those films where I'll never, ever see again.

Monday, 11 May 2020 08:04

In an age where people are more concerned with violence than the good, and the bad, in war we have a film about the dark side of war. In this film we see a young soldier, who has lost his faith, and who finds redemption through a personal journey to God. What I liked about this film was the way that the movie portrayed the life of an army soldier. There are many soldiers who have been in combat and have lost their faith, but they have found peace through their faith. I also liked the way that the movie showed the war as a personal journey. The war was personal to me, but I could see how the soldiers felt about it. This film also showed that war can be a good thing, as long as the people are in control of it.

Thursday, 07 May 2020 09:52

This is a superbly made movie, with an excellent cast and story. I was impressed with the writing and the acting. The story was moving and the direction was expert. I would recommend this movie to anyone who is interested in World War II. The only negative thing I can say about the movie is the ending. It was somewhat predictable, but it was still good. The ending made it seem like this movie was not a true story, and it could have been much better.

Tuesday, 05 May 2020 01:14

One thing I had a problem with is that the character of the Corporal was quite similar to the character of Private Turner. The way Turner had found his way to Vietnam, where he lived in the Australian Defence Force and the only reason he had survived was due to the fact that he was a "bad ass" was actually similar to the character of Corporal Miller. I liked the idea of using the Corporal as a "bad ass" but I didn't like the character of Turner. I didn't like the way the Corporal was portrayed in this film as being so cynical and he was a character that you just couldn't sympathize with. In my opinion, it just didn't seem like a true representation of a Corporal. So overall, this is an OK film that I would recommend.

Sunday, 03 May 2020 05:42

The most interesting thing about this film is the way the writer has used the "Hollywood" aspects of the film to tell the story. When the film is set in World War II, it is often told from the viewpoint of an American soldier, and then from the point of view of the German soldier. I don't think that the film could have worked without that. In the film, the American soldier is portrayed as the hero of the war, and the German soldier is portrayed as the villain of the war. I think that is how the film should be presented, but it works well in this case. The film is a little slow to start off with, and I would have liked to see a little more action in the beginning. But I do recommend this film to anyone who is interested in the period of World War II.

Saturday, 02 May 2020 23:46

This film shows the true story of a family who lost a son during World War II. It shows the pain and agony the family went through and the decision they made to stay with their son in the bunker. This movie is so moving, it will leave you with a feeling of loss and a sense of justice. I give this movie an 8 out of 10. If you are a person who has had a close friend die, or you have a relative who has died, you will definitely like this movie. It shows the true reality of what war can do to a family.

Saturday, 02 May 2020 10:28

This is the story of an international mercenary, working for the Nazis during World War 2, who joins the British resistance and ends up serving with the highest ranking soldier of the resistance, George Orwell. He is recruited by a famous professor of English to become a writer in the field of war, but when he meets a young woman who worked as a model and later, the daughter of a British hero, he is drawn to the resistance. I've never read Orwell's "1984" and this is not a book that is well known, but I do know that it is the novel that has introduced the concept of the internet, the social media and the internet as the platform of the world. And since I don't know a lot about the book, I can only say that the film is very well done. It is filled with political issues, like the war and the war is not always just about tanks. It is about a war that was based on lies, that was about a world that was turned upside down. It is a great story and it shows a story of a war that was ignored by the government of the day, and it shows the truth about the actions of the most evil of all wars. It is a very serious film and I recommend it to anyone who is interested in the history of war. The music by the conductor Joseph Zito is also very effective. The film is worth seeing.

Thursday, 30 Apr 2020 01:31

We know the Germans were forced to kill, they were indeed. But what about the British, are they really guilty? Or was it the Germans who were victims? It seems to me that one could argue that this is all about the victors. But I think this is not the case. This is a war about a certain idealistic view of war. War is not about killing, not about beheadings, not about torturing people. War is about dominating other people, about oppressing them, by whatever means. And, as far as this war goes, those who were not willing to participate in the slaughter, that was their own choice. That is what it means to be a victim of a war. This is not something that the victors should be concerned with, but a crime committed by others. This is about an actual state of mind, not a supposed 'false consciousness'. And that is something that needs to be discussed, not the atrocities that took place. However, the movie did have some good points, especially when the government was made to appear to be more humane than it actually was. And there were some good actors in the cast. The ending was a bit cliche, but the rest of the movie was a bit more realistic. I think it is best to leave the outcome up to the viewer. But I think that the actions of the characters portrayed in the movie were quite believable, and they deserve the praise they have received. It is certainly worth seeing.

Sunday, 26 Apr 2020 22:52

Taken from the books by Daniel Payne, "The Private War" is an interesting film that brings to life a war that has been a part of American history for over four decades. I first saw "The Private War" when I was in college in 1986. I think that it was one of the first films I saw on the subject of the Vietnam War, and I was riveted by the story. Now, after being a war vet myself, I can see the Vietnam War and I can understand why this war was such a big deal back then. But I just can't put my finger on why this film resonates so well to me today. I think it's because the story is so powerful. In the movie, two soldiers, Sgt. Martin Riggs (John Cusack) and Pvt. Bill Gates (Owen Wilson) become personal friends. They learn to share their emotions with each other and to see each other as men. One of the most powerful scenes is when Gates tells Riggs that he's on the same team as him. Riggs is unsure if he should trust him, but is very understanding. The most important thing I think about this film is that it does not glorify war. The film's cinematography is superb and the performances are superb. It is a powerful story, but the way it is told and the way it is told it can be challenging to the viewers. But it is a must see film. I give "The Private War" a 7 out of 10.

Saturday, 25 Apr 2020 21:21

I am very familiar with the story of The Blackhawk Down. That is the name of the mercenary group which went out to Africa to rescue hostages from a US army. After a mission goes horribly wrong, a lot of men are killed and the group must find a way to return to the US. However, it took me quite some time to really get to know the story of Private Ryan and The Blackhawk Down. The movie has been mentioned on a few forums, but for me it was quite difficult to get into the story. Not only that, but the story is not very different to the story in that movie. The only major difference is that it takes place in a third world country and that in addition to the story, there is also the political and social elements. So if you are a film buff, then you might want to give this movie a chance. But it is really not that much of a story, and certainly not an entertaining one. The movie was quite forgettable for me.

Saturday, 25 Apr 2020 15:25

I was not impressed by this movie. I thought it was very predictable. I do not want to give any spoilers, but it was very predictable. I was expecting more from this movie, because it is the second of two films dealing with the same subject matter. I am not saying it is bad, but it is just not that interesting or entertaining. The second film, V for Vendetta, was much more interesting. It was much more exciting and the movie had an interesting message to the story. I was disappointed in this movie because I did not think it was as good as V for Vendetta. I would have to give this movie a 7 out of 10.

Amber Hernandez

Friday, 24 Apr 2020 08:06

I saw this film in Cannes last year and I was impressed with the acting. The film tells the story of an African slave, who escaped the shackles of slavery and found refuge in the French colonies. The story is complex and the acting is superb. I am not a great fan of movies like this, but I enjoyed this movie. It was a well-paced and well-constructed story with great acting. This is a film that you should see.

Tuesday, 21 Apr 2020 17:12

An even better movie than War Horse. The difference is that War Horse is entertaining and shows true bravery and even a little bit of loyalty. John Wayne shows the same amount of guts and heart, and is able to show off his acting abilities. The difference is that this is a true story, and the movie shows the real suffering and brutality of the war. This is an outstanding movie for war fans. The acting is superb, the production is great, and the sound track is outstanding. For a true story, this is the best one I have seen. The movie is excellent for all ages.

Saturday, 18 Apr 2020 20:30

The first thing I will say about this movie is that it is a great movie. That being said, I will tell you that it is not the best movie ever made. The reason for this is because this movie is not really about WWII, it is a war movie. I do not know how else to put this, the war is not the center of the movie. The war is not the center of the movie. The movie focuses on a single story, the story of a small group of soldiers who go to Vietnam in the spring of 1965. The story is told through flashbacks, as the soldiers tell their stories. One thing that I liked about this movie is that there was no plot. This was not like the book "Das Boot" which made a lot of sense, but there was no plot. The reason for this is because I do not know how to write a plot. I cannot write a plot. I just know about the history of the world. I know about the history of Vietnam, but that does not mean I know how it started, how it ended, or what the people were like. I don't even know if the movie was based on a true story, I just know that it was a war movie. The one thing I did not like about this movie was the fact that the soldiers in this movie were not the same men that went to Vietnam. I am not saying that there were not soldiers who were there, but they were not the same soldiers. In the book the soldiers were the same. It was like watching a documentary. This made the movie not as good. There was a great director in "The Red Cross", and I have to say that "The Red Cross" was better than "The Killing Fields". The movie does not show the same soldiers as the book did. This was not a good thing for me because I was trying to watch the movie because of the book. But I do like how the movie was told. This was the most important thing about the movie because if you watch this movie and you know what I am saying, then you will not get the point of the movie. I give this movie a 7/10. I give the movie a B-.

Tuesday, 14 Apr 2020 02:44

I am not a fan of war films but this one I think is very good. It shows the atrocities that the United States military committed in Vietnam, and how Americans in general were more concerned with their own interests and doing their part for the "civilian nation" than the suffering of others. This film is very powerful in that it really shows how soldiers were not just the defenders of a country, but also the prime cause of war. The actors in this film really pull off their roles well, the scenes in Hanoi are good. It's a very important film, and the actors did a very good job in it.

Saturday, 28 Mar 2020 16:23

I just got back from the National Theatre in London and it was great. First of all, it was a shame that more people didn't see this. This was definitely an "upcoming" film that the National would be doing. There is no way that this film is going to win the Oscar, but I still think it is an extremely strong film. I have read that this is a very sad story, and it was that way, but I was not completely in agreement with that. The film really doesn't delve into the actual story. The script was very interesting, but the film is not all that deep. I thought the main story was the Germans taking over the British. However, there were a few things about the Nazis that were still relevant today. The only thing I really did not like about this film was the acting. I would definitely suggest that you don't pay attention to any of the actors in this film. I think that these actors could have made the film much better, but they just did not seem like they were doing the film justice. The only actors that really caught my attention were the two leading actors. However, I would have liked to see more of both of them in the film. I think that if I had to choose, I would have preferred to see Tom Hardy in the film. He was very good. The acting is not good enough to really get me excited about this film. This is a sad film, and I am not sure how I would feel about it.

Saturday, 28 Mar 2020 12:17

This is a great movie and one that I would recommend to anyone interested in World War II. I saw this movie when it was released in the theaters and I have watched it many times since then. The story of an Irish soldier, Rick Dees, being in the line of fire during the Battle of the Bulge is very sad and I think it's one of the most dramatic things I have ever seen on the big screen. As a kid I used to love World War II movies and this movie captured the same feeling. The acting was good. I thought Brendan Gleeson was great as the leading character. I thought he was good in this movie. Kevin Costner was great as well. It was really impressive to see this film in the theaters. It is a very touching movie and I can recommend this movie to anyone.

Saturday, 28 Mar 2020 04:27

This film has many elements that are being unfairly dismissed by the mainstream media. The script is excellent and the acting is superb. I had to watch this film twice to see the subtitles. I hope it does well at the box office and inspires other filmmakers to follow in the footsteps of Anthony Minghella and Martin McDonagh. I strongly recommend this film to all.

Janice Hernandez

Saturday, 28 Mar 2020 00:52

This movie had a lot of potential. The lead character's name is Adrian. I think it's a good thing that this character is played by Ryan Gosling. He's the real deal. The film is also full of funny and smart dialogue. The characters have a lot of depth. You can really see the lives they lead and how they are struggling. The characters are well developed. The soundtrack is amazing. I also like how the film shows the whole picture of a war and the people's lives during it. It also shows the effect the war has on the people. The soundtrack is really great and it shows how much the war affected the people. The film also has a lot of really good action. I love how the film shows the different war zones and how the people are trying to survive. The film is a good film for people who want to learn more about the conflict in Iraq. This film will be a great film for those who want to learn more about war and how it affects people.

See all 31 reviews

Write a review