x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch The 33

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(33976) 6.9 127 min 2015

The 33 is a movie starring Antonio Banderas, Rodrigo Santoro, and Juliette Binoche. Based on the real-life event, when a gold and copper mine collapses, it traps 33 miners underground for 69 days.

Starring: Rodrigo Santoro, Antonio Banderas, Juliette Binoche, James Brolin

Genres: History, Drama, Biography

Director: Patricia Riggen

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	History, Drama, Biography
Director	Patricia Riggen
Writer	Michael Thomas, Hector Tobar, Jose Rivera, Mikko Alanne, Craig Borten
Stars	Rodrigo Santoro, Antonio Banderas, Juliette Binoche, James Brolin
Country	Colombia, Chile, Spain
Also Known As	33 ψυχές, Maden, 33：重生奇蹟, 33, Les 33, Os 33, Los 33, 69 Tage Hoffnung, Los 33: una historia de esperanza, チリ33人　希望の軌跡, A harminchármak
Runtime	2H 7M
Description	Dozens of people from Copiapó, Chile, work in the San José mine. The owner ignores the warnings of the failing stability of the mine, which collapses a short time later. The only path inside the mine is completely blocked, and the thirty-three miners manage to get to the rescue chamber. They discover that the radio is useless, the medical kit is empty, the ventilation shafts lack the required ladders, and there is very little stored food. Mario Sepúlveda becomes the leader of the miners, dividing the foods rations and stopping the outbursts of violence and despair. The mine company does not attempt any rescue, and the relatives of the miners gather around the gates..

Download history «The 33»

Blu-ray
13.8 GB

Customers who watched biography «The 33» also watched

25 customer reviews about drama «The 33»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Tuesday, 14 Apr 2020 14:19

I will keep this brief, though. After seeing the movie, I came to the conclusion that the film makers were trying to do an honest portrayal of what it was like to be an Allied pilot in WW2. After reading some of the other comments, I would have to say that there was one point that I felt was not really properly explained, and I can't see any other reason why it should have been included. The movie covers a couple of years of the plane's life. We get to see what the plane was like, how it worked, how the crew of the plane operated, etc. However, we don't get to see much of the pilots, other than for a brief few scenes in the film. So we are left to wonder what they were doing, and what their thoughts were, and the others were just sort of there as well. While this was certainly not the focus of the film, it is one thing that the movie makers could have done without. The story takes a while to get going, and I would have liked to see the story progress at a faster pace. I will say, though, that the movie did not get boring, and I would recommend it to those who have not yet seen the film.

Tuesday, 14 Apr 2020 12:53

A man claiming to be the "Son of God" meets the Queen Mother (her description of this man has the ring of truth in it) and is baptized. He becomes an indentured servant of the monarchy. He loses his faith, however, and finds himself becoming a very violent rebel. When he is imprisoned and tortured, his rebel tendencies cause him to rebel. This movie could have been very good. But it was not. The acting was fine. James Gandolfini's acting was so spot on that I was left wishing he had been given a better role. But I was also left disappointed that this movie was not as good as the films that came before. The cinematography was beautiful, but not great. It did not take advantage of the beautiful scenery. It was all camera-work. The effects of the war were okay, but I was expecting more. The only reason I give this movie a seven is because of the acting. It was great. The rest of the movie was not. It had good music, but I felt that the songs were not strong enough to carry the movie. Overall, this movie was a big disappointment. It was good. It was just not as good as the films that came before it.

Monday, 13 Apr 2020 15:42

When the film came out in 2005, it was initially met with the same reaction from the media as "Shawshank Redemption" or "Pride and Prejudice." Films are supposed to be of a higher standard. I felt this film was too overrated and should have been at least a 6, but it's a definite 7. I've always felt that director Terence Davies deserves more credit than he got, I think that was the best thing that could have been done with the film. I've read that the film was made for just about $30 million. That's ridiculous, it's actually about $140 million. This film is so over-hyped and over-rated that it's almost painful to watch. The acting was superb, with Julianne Moore and Ben Kingsley, I've seen better in real life. It was also great to see Gary Oldman and Jamie Bell. I guess the story was unbelievable and nothing else but I felt the film was entertaining enough, and I can't complain too much. For me, the ending was too over-the-top and unnecessary, I felt it was almost a comedy at times. I felt that some of the performances were too over-the-top. There was no question about that. I could go on and on, but I think you get the point. It's a good film, but it's a bit overrated and over-hyped. 7/10

Sunday, 12 Apr 2020 08:07

Here's the main thing. The 33 has a very simple and straight forward plot. It's about the resistance movement during the German occupation of Poland. The young girl goes into hiding and the Germans find her and take her back to Germany where they place her in the concentration camp. They abuse her and they rape her. The whole thing is very realistic. The best part of the film is the play that takes place. I think this is the most beautiful film I've ever seen. It's very poetic and very powerful. I love the way it ends. I don't think there's much more to say about the film. The film does everything right. It has great acting, beautiful cinematography and a strong, powerful story. I would recommend it to any movie fan. I'm pretty sure you'll like it.

Saturday, 11 Apr 2020 17:03

In my mind this film is only a year too late. The events that occurred between 2010 and 2012 took the global financial system and economic system to a whole new level. The movie was clearly being meant for an audience of teenagers. The rating of "PG-13" is only showing that the film was being made by adults and not necessarily aimed at younger viewers. However, this is a personal opinion of mine and I believe it is only fair to not give away anything about the movie before watching. My experience with this movie was somewhat similar to the movie "Rise of the Planet of the Apes". They both had very obvious flaws but they also did a decent job of keeping a close eye on social and political events around the world. For me, this film did not come across as being an accurate portrayal of what actually happened. While I am still not completely convinced that the financial crisis in the United States was a result of fraud, the facts presented in the movie show that the biggest banks were not only behind the crisis but also the use of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to provide home loans to the financial institutions that needed them most. While the movie does a good job of showing the motivations of the bankers behind the financial crisis, I felt that the movie could have done a better job of explaining the role of politicians and the banking industry in the bailout, instead of just focusing on the banking industry. It was almost as if the writers were more interested in showing the politics of the movie rather than the actual situation in the United States. It was a good movie but if you really want to see a story that shows what really happened, you could watch "The Big Short" or "The Big Short." It is very clear that it is not what happened that was important, but what the government did with the financial crisis that was very important. Overall, I enjoyed the movie but I did not feel it was very accurate and I felt it did not portray the crisis in the way I would have liked it to be portrayed.

Thursday, 09 Apr 2020 18:25

Walking out of the movie theater in Los Angeles, one has to wonder why? I walked out feeling more, "It's almost as good as the original." That's not a small thing. "The 33" is an intense experience. The film is a tightly woven tapestry of the year in which the movie takes place, that of the thirties and forties, the era of the real black man's struggle for justice in America, or so it was at that time. The story of how that struggle came to be, how a former slave's family became the subject of a Hollywood blockbuster, is told in the first person, by a single, African-American author (I did not know this before). The story follows three generations, all intertwined in their own ways, as we hear their stories of how they came to be, as well as the evolution of the system that made it possible. For me, as someone who has lived in Los Angeles for many years, the movie struck the right note of historical realism, the right weight of the era, the right balance of the drama and the drama of the story. No one moment in the movie was overdone, no story was unnecessary. Everything had a point, and everything was explained by the characters. And that's a big thing. These are not two stars. They're not two directors. They're not two actors. They're three filmmakers who cared about telling a story, and who gave us a satisfying, sometimes profound, but never overbearing, telling of the year in which this movie takes place. And, yes, that is saying a lot.

Thursday, 09 Apr 2020 03:21

As many of the other reviews of this film have stated, the only real disappointment is that I couldn't get a DVD player to output the excellent picture quality that the film was designed to give me. It is far superior to the picture quality I was able to get on a computer, and the sound was excellent. There were a couple of minor scenes where the image was blurry, but nothing major. The scenes were well placed and shown in such a way that the viewer could not tell what was going on. Most of the movie had great acting, especially Leonardo DiCaprio. I think he should get more Oscar nominations, and for that, I think he deserves the Oscar for Best Actor. There were a few parts that didn't seem to fit, such as the sequence in which the CIA guy decides to take over the CIA and attempt to assassinate Fidel Castro. That was not the best shot, and I believe that the movie could have chosen a better shot. Overall, this is a good movie. It is definitely worth the watch.

Thursday, 09 Apr 2020 01:55

This movie tells the story of a young German Jew who was a spy for the Germans in WWII. The movie tells the story of a man's search for his country, for his parents, for his people, and the final victory of the Germans. The director is a Jew, but he is also German. So he has a Jewish background and the story is told by a German Jew who had to give up his German identity. I will not go into details, because this is a good movie. I will only say that the American people have a responsibility to have a discussion about the Holocaust. The movie will not be popular because it is not about the Holocaust. It is about the efforts of a German Jew to hide his identity and find his roots.

Sunday, 05 Apr 2020 22:33

The 33 is a perfect example of the classic mobster movie.The movie deals with the rise and fall of a multi-millionaire mobster.The movie is based on a book by James L. Goss.The movie is completely directed by David Mamet.There is not much violence in the movie but there are some scenes of violent attacks by the mob.The movie deals with the life of the mobster James Gabberta.It also talks about the life of the mobster Al Capone.The movie is filled with moments of laughter.The movie is very entertaining and is full of great moments.The movie will entertain you for a long time.

Saturday, 04 Apr 2020 22:32

In 1985, a mass murderer was executed in the United States for the murders of several people at his trial. That was the year of The Times Square Killer. The media frenzy was huge and the murder was one of the biggest stories in the US. So it was that the general public was trying to learn about the case, so to speak. So, for the next few years, countless documentaries and books were produced, usually focused on the case of the killer, but also on other aspects of the man, such as his abusive childhood, his high school career, his struggles with mental illness, and his later success in a career as a high-profile journalist. It was a great story to tell, and the men behind the story were all impressive. The cases of Robert J. Harris and Jeffrey Dahmer were similar in that they were all high profile and famous. But The New York Times Square Killer was very different. It was really a dark, horrifying story, and it was focused on the murders of the victims, not the perpetrator. And that's why it was such a great story. There were a number of people in the media who knew about the murders, but most of the media wasn't interested in the story. The criminal case, although involving a high-profile murderer, was so obscure that nobody in the mainstream media had a clue as to what the man was doing. So this wasn't a story you'd hear about on TV or in newspapers. It was a story you'd have to read about. And that's why it was so great. The real problem with this story is that it's been told in so many different ways over the years. We have the murders, we have the media hype, and we have the media backlash. Now, I am not against each of those. There have been numerous documentaries about The Times Square Killer. I have a copy of The Times Square Killer: The Murder at the Center of the New York Times. It's just not the same as this documentary. I think it's better than the others, but it's still not the same. The first time I saw this film, it was when I was younger. I had not yet been exposed to the case in the way it was presented in the media. I had never heard of it before that point, and I was still confused. So, I didn't have a great experience of the film. When I heard about it again, I thought I would just watch it again to get my bearings. But that's not the case. The film is still somewhat confused and unclear. I would recommend this film for people who are interested in the story, because it has been told so many different ways. It's not a documentary. It's a different film. And it's not for everyone. I did enjoy it, but I would say it's not the film to watch if

Friday, 03 Apr 2020 10:16

I'm not going to go into detail with what the film is about, but i will say that this film is directed and edited well and has some interesting angles to it. The film has a great visual style to it and works well with the film. The director managed to have a good look at the current Egyptian politics and society. It's not one of those films that is a documentary and a great look at the current politics in Egypt. The film deals with many things, but i think that it's a good example of how a film can be good, and it doesn't take itself too seriously. The actors, although having limited dialog, are well acted. I don't know how they all know Egyptian, but they did well in their roles. There are a few different actors, but they are all good and had some chemistry with the others. Overall, i think the film is good. The visuals and cinematography were nice and the film does have a look about it that is interesting. If you like documentaries, this film is worth a watch. If you want to see a documentary, watch anything from 'Rosewater' to 'Mystery of the Wax Museum' or 'The Circle' or 'Shame' or 'The Sixth Sense' or 'Two Days, One Night' or 'The New World' or 'Florence Foster Jenkins'. If you like non-fiction, check out 'The Act of Killing' or 'Viral' or 'Hidden Figures' or 'Ex Machina' or 'The Death of Stalin' or 'What Happened, Miss Simone?' or 'The Death of Stalin' or 'Citizenfour' or 'The Life and Death of Lee Harvey Oswald' or 'The New World' or 'The Power of Two' or 'Truth or Dare'. I think you'll enjoy this film. It's not the best film I've seen, but it is an interesting and worthwhile watch.

Michael Stevens

Friday, 03 Apr 2020 08:50

I didn't see this film in the theaters, so I had no idea what it was about. It is based on true events. One of the things I loved about it was that it was not so white, the main characters were all black. It showed the struggles of black men during the late 50's to early 60's. Many of the characters were kidnapped and all of them were put into a room for 8 hours. This was just the beginning. The black man in the film was one of the most significant figures in the entire film. He was even imprisoned and they kept him in the basement for eight hours. You really got to understand the nature of segregation. I would also like to mention the great acting. This is a film that shows what racism was like in a society that was just getting started. It also shows what was happening to people who were really oppressed. I think all people who have children should watch this film. I hope they can learn from the hardships they have faced. I think this is a great film that needs to be shown to everyone.

Wednesday, 01 Apr 2020 11:37

In a short period of time, Russell Crowe won best actor at the Oscars and gave us a string of strong performances. Crowe's performance in the role of Russell Crowe was one of his best yet. I have seen a few movies where the performances of a particular actor has made me stop and think about the entire film and how amazing the whole package is. Russell Crowe has the best performances in my opinion and this movie was no different. There are several scenes where the actor's whole body language, facial expression and gestures are absolutely incredible. Crowe does a very good job of making us forget that this is a movie. Russell Crowe was truly a worthy winner for this year's Oscar and I am very proud of him for winning this award. The 33 has a very good story and is quite good, but the script and story-telling is definitely not as strong as other films this year. I really liked the beginning part of the film and the ending, but the rest of the film is very predictable and you know exactly what's going to happen. I found the storyline of the film to be a little weak and I think it should have been stronger. I think it would have made a great addition to a movie that needs to be told in a way that will stand the test of time. A good story is not a weak plot, but it's a good story nonetheless. I will say that I do believe Russell Crowe is one of the most underrated actors. Russell Crowe has such a great performance in this film and it's a very good one. I hope he keeps his amazing performances coming. We can all learn from Russell Crowe's performance. I will say this film is well worth seeing.

Wednesday, 01 Apr 2020 10:11

The 33, directed by Aaron Taylor Johnson, is a film set in the late 1940's to the early 1950's. In this film we meet Johnnie Walker, a cigar-chomping English professor, and his new apprentice, Robin Van Cleef, a poor artist. As the movie begins we meet the previous Walker's two apprentices, George Stevens and Hugo Skinner. Both have a grudge against Johnnie Walker and are desperate to get back at him. So when Johnnie Walker shows up on the scene, the three of them immediately go after him. That is until George Stevens (and his wife) decides to stay away from the proceedings, deciding that the truth about Johnnie Walker is to be kept a secret. The next day, George Stevens and his wife get together with Johnnie Walker and we find out that they both had a thing for Johnnie Walker. And they also love him, despite what George Stevens thinks. The next day the three of them meet again, and both George Stevens and Johnnie Walker have made some serious mistakes in their lives. One of which is Johnnie Walker's wife. And they decide to destroy their love for Johnnie Walker so that they can live the rest of their lives as human beings. But this is a story that you have to read to find out what happens next. I have to admit that I liked this film a lot. It's a beautiful movie. It had a great plot, great characters and a great story. It is also interesting to see that a film like this is based on true events. I think that the biggest problem with the film is that the plot doesn't take too much time to develop. It seems that the film jumps back and forth from a number of events and it does that for a long time. I don't know if it was the director's fault or the story's fault. Maybe the story was so slow that the director couldn't keep up with the story's pace. Either way, the story is very slow and the plot is quite predictable. In my opinion, this movie would have been better if the story had been faster. I did like the fact that this film was made during the times when it was OK to use language and to have sex in movies. I think that there were a lot of good movies during this time period, but this film was not one of them. It is still a good movie, but it was a lot slower than I was hoping it to be. Overall, the film was well made and I think that the plot was a lot better than I expected. It was a good film, but I would have preferred it if the story had been a little faster.

Monday, 30 Mar 2020 05:27

In their quest to understand who Hitler was, we learn that he was one of those "people" who were so desperate to believe in their "reality" that they chose the most ludicrous, and most ridiculous, of all possible ways to try to achieve this goal. And they chose a madman to do this. So in their attempt to understand what makes this person tick, we also learn what makes him tick. The plot of the film is interesting, but again, because it's about the man behind the legend, the film becomes too long and drawn out. And the film loses that magic that is so wonderful to the people who watch it. We see the beauty of this man and his family. But to learn about his personality, we need to learn about the man behind the legend, the man we never saw. So again, to those who have not seen this film, I would suggest that you see it and learn the most interesting and special story of the world's greatest and most powerful person, and that story will be better for it.

Sunday, 29 Mar 2020 12:58

At one point I thought this movie was going to be another piece of garbage from the campy stage plays. Boy, was I wrong. All the actors are first rate, but this film has a strong political point. I think it is a very good film for those who can enjoy a realistic look at the war. Many scenes were highly realistic. I think it would be good for the younger generation to see this film.

Wednesday, 25 Mar 2020 18:20

I found the film to be a bit slow and seemed to be running on the verge of an interruption at times, but I thought the film was well done overall. I like the fact that the film makes you think and really works in giving you a glimpse into the world of the characters. I really liked the location, and I really like the acting of all the actors and the fact that it seemed like it was quite difficult to believe the children were children.

Wednesday, 25 Mar 2020 15:58

I saw this film at the Toronto Film Festival and I must say it was an extremely well done film. I would not say it is a great film, but it was certainly a good film. The acting was great and I think the director did an excellent job of telling the story in a way that was both visually appealing and historically accurate. The movie was also very interesting to me because it really showed the Japanese not as the evil and bad things they were and portrayed them as good people. It also showed how they were actually trying to help the American people and how they were actually a people that were trying to help the American people. The only real problem I had with the film was the way they shot the war scenes. I understand that it was trying to make the film look like a documentary but I just felt like the shots were a little bit cheesy and I just thought they should have shot some of the scenes differently. Overall, I give this film an 8 out of 10 and it is a great film to watch. I would definitely recommend it to anyone that has not seen the film.

Wednesday, 25 Mar 2020 15:18

I enjoyed this movie and the film makers did a good job of portraying the hardships of the common man in America. There is a scene at the end of the film when the main character, Bob, is sitting in a bar with his friends and talking about his life. The man is sitting with his eyes wide open, he is a large man with an expression of pain and fear on his face. His friends are also in the bar, and all of them are talking and laughing. Bob is the one who is laughing the most, he is crying and sad. He is also telling the story of the people who were his friends in his life, and how he has changed them, and how his life has changed for the better. The film makers did a great job of showing the hardships of the common man, and how he has changed his life for the better. This film is a must see for any true American. It is also a great film to show to children as well.

Wednesday, 25 Mar 2020 13:37

I liked this movie a lot. There was a lot of important information that we can take away from this movie. Especially the fact that the government didn't want to tell the truth about a lot of things because they knew the truth would destroy their economy. Also the fact that America has been destroyed is also important to know. The movie has a lot of good quotes and facts that we can take away from. The movies cover many different subjects such as how the country was destroyed, how the economy was destroyed, the american flag being burned, and the world war in general. It also discusses the effects of the radiation that was used. I also liked that the movie showed the life of the average american as they were in the 1960s. It showed what a great country America was and how they were in the 60s. They also showed that this movie was accurate with what was happening in the 60s.

Wednesday, 25 Mar 2020 12:30

I found it to be a very well done movie with a very interesting story. I really like the characters in the movie. They were very well portrayed. I like the way they played off of each other. There were many times where I was like "What just happened?" It was very well done. I would recommend this movie to anyone who wants to see a movie that will make you think. It has a good story line, and the characters were well played. I also like the music in the movie, and I think it was very well done. I would give this movie an 8/10.

Wednesday, 25 Mar 2020 11:54

I haven't seen the real movie yet, but I have read some reviews, and they have already mentioned it. So, this is not a review. This is the movie itself. I would rate it a 7.5, if you can find it. If you can't, give it a 5 or a 6.

Wednesday, 25 Mar 2020 11:26

This film could have been a real disaster for me. But what it accomplished was to capture the essence of how dictatorships (and, in particular, a dictatorship) can operate. It could have also been a great piece of drama with great acting, but it isn't. Even though the film was based on the true story, it is also extremely political. And that is something that is needed to make a movie. There were some very powerful scenes in the film. There were also many scenes in which I actually started to feel sad for the people who died in the Holocaust. I think a lot of people were left out of this film because of that. In the end, I think people need to know how dangerous a dictatorship can be and how destructive a dictatorship can be. This is not a film for the faint of heart, but if you are a fan of history and how things really were, you will be happy you watched this film.

Jonathan Russell

Wednesday, 25 Mar 2020 09:58

I have seen and read many reviews for this film that I do not agree with. I think it is very interesting that it does not give you the answers. I understand that this film is made to tell a story. The plot is based on a true story and a couple of key elements that were present in the incident were not present in the actual story. However I am not going to talk about that. What I do want to talk about is the acting. Paul Dano gives a very good performance in this film. He is probably the most convincing actor I have seen in a film this year. Nicole Kidman is also good but she has a lot of smaller parts in the film. She is very convincing in these smaller roles and she makes the film. Richard Dreyfus and Paul Bettany have very good performances as well. All the other actors in this film have very strong performances and it shows. In the end I think it is a good film that will keep you thinking about the incident. If you are interested in the real story of the incident I think it is worth seeing. However I think it is also a story about one man who has to cope with the personal tragedy of the event.

Wednesday, 25 Mar 2020 08:02

I was initially skeptical about seeing this movie. I thought it would be a boring retelling of history. But as the movie unfolded, I was moved to tears. I was moved to tears by the horrible things that had happened to these people, and by the humanity of these men and women. The movie left me with a sense of empathy for these people, and with a hope that their story can inspire other people to do the right thing. I will not be able to watch this movie without feeling so moved, and so grateful for the people who had to suffer for the sake of the world. I recommend this movie to anyone, and I am so grateful for its being made. If you don't believe in the humanity of the Armenian people, you will never be able to understand what these people were going through, and how they were so moved by the people who came after them. It is hard to watch this movie, but it is so worth it.

See all 25 reviews

Write a review