x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Victoria & Abdul

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(29020) 6.8 111 min 2017

Victoria & Abdul is a movie starring Judi Dench, Ali Fazal, and Tim Pigott-Smith. Queen Victoria strikes up an unlikely friendship with a young Indian clerk named Abdul Karim.

Starring: Ali Fazal, Tim Pigott-Smith, Eddie Izzard, Judi Dench

Genres: History, Biography, Drama

Director: Stephen Frears

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	History, Biography, Drama
Director	Stephen Frears
Writer	Shrabani Basu, Lee Hall
Stars	Ali Fazal, Tim Pigott-Smith, Eddie Izzard, Judi Dench
Country	USA, UK
Also Known As	Victoria and Abdul, Victoria & Abdul: Nữ Hoàng & Tri Kỷ, Confident Royal, Βικτώρια και Αμπντούλ, La reina Victoria y Abdul, Victoria et Abdul, Le'ha'ir et ha'malka, Victoria si Abdul, Powiernik królowej, Victoria y Abdul, Viktória királynő és Abdul, Vittoria e Abdul, Victoria e Abdul: O Confidente da Rainha, Vitória & Abdul, Victoria i Abdul, Victoria ja Abdul, Viktorija ir Abdulas, ヴィクトリア女王　最期の秘密, Victoria ve Abdul, 女王與知己
Runtime	1H 51M
Description	Abdul Karim (Ali Fazal) arrives from India to participate in Queen Victoria's (Dame Judi Dench's) golden jubilee. The young clerk is surprised to find favor with the Queen. As Victoria questions the constrictions of her long-held position, the two forge an unlikely and devoted alliance that her household and inner circle try to destroy. As their friendship deepens, the Queen begins to see a changing world through new eyes, joyfully reclaiming her humanity.

Download history «Victoria & Abdul»

Blu-ray
13.64 GB

Windows
5.34 GB

Customers who watched drama «Victoria & Abdul» also watched

22 customer reviews about biography «Victoria & Abdul»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Thursday, 09 Apr 2020 08:45

I have never been a fan of Andrew Garfield. For some strange reason I've always thought that his performance in "American Pie" was pretty terrible and his performance in "No Country For Old Men" was an utter disaster. "No Country For Old Men" was an instant classic. It's a well-written film, and the performances by Bruce Willis and Javier Bardem are the ones that really set this film apart. "American Pie" was terrible. I'm not sure why I thought it was any good, but it was terrible. I had never seen a film like it, and I found it just not good. This film however, has the biggest star in Hollywood, Bruce Willis, in it. Bruce Willis does a fantastic job in this film, which, from the first scene, you know he is going to do a great job. It doesn't take a genius to see this film. Everyone in the film plays their roles well, especially the supporting cast. It's not the story that is the problem here, but rather the story itself. I can't really fault the story because it's very good. It's very well-written, and the pace is just right. I can't fault the performance, however. I found Javier Bardem's performance to be just as good as Bruce Willis'. It's a shame that Javier Bardem didn't win the Oscar for his performance because it would have been a great upset for Bardem, but Bardem doesn't have that big of a role and he should have won. I would have been happy if Javier Bardem won the Oscar for the role. His performance is very good. When I saw Javier Bardem's performance, I was more impressed with the way Bardem portrayed the character. The character was developed well. The character's role in the movie is just as important as the plot. This was a good movie, but not a great movie. The only reason it's not in the top 5 is because of the terrible performance from Javier Bardem. I was hoping for a much better performance from Javier Bardem, but it just wasn't enough. The performances were good. The story was good, but it was still a flawed story. I give this movie a 7/10.

Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 01:12

I really liked this movie. It's a bit like an old-time movie, a period of the 20th century, in which all the common people are portrayed. It's in the beginning of the 21st century, and we all know that everyone's name has changed and that there are too many Arabs in the world. However, I didn't see many pictures of the people, but it's enough to know that everyone's a bit different. And I'm a bit of a movie buff, and I really enjoy a good story. The cast is great, but the actor's performance was awesome. He's so cool and good-looking, and the main role is very difficult. I can't believe that this film won such a prestigious award, and I don't understand it. However, I think that this film is very good, and I recommend it to everyone. 7 out of 10.

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 11:32

The movie was surprisingly good. It had a lot of action, drama, and romance. It was an enjoyable movie. However, as the acting was decent, the movie became a little too long. The movie was also a little to long for my liking. I would have given the movie an 8/10 but for some reason the movie was deemed a "great" by some people. They felt the movie was great because it was so long, and the acting was good. That's not the case, I think that it was a good movie, but not great.

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 07:17

A movie about the Soviet Union is always a hard movie to make. After all, it's hard to depict the period in which Russia was changing. One can't just put the bad in America and paint the good. Still, this movie is a little different. The acting is top-notch and the story is fairly interesting. There are some quite disturbing scenes, such as the fight between Khrushchev and Khruschev over whether they should form a union. A film about the Soviet Union, of course, should be disturbing. The movie was released in 2004, and although the movie is still very popular in Russia, it's not as strong as it was before. There are plenty of movies about the Soviet Union, but they aren't as good as the film is. While watching it, I wasn't bored once, but it's not that good. 7/10

Monday, 06 Apr 2020 16:13

I loved this film as a kid but my wife dislikes Hollywood films. I remember seeing it as a teen when it was still in theaters and I thought it was a great film. I was right and I thought the film was great then and it remains great now. The acting was top notch, the music was good, the costumes and the setting were great. The two principal leads were very believable and believable. They had great chemistry, they were likable and believable. You actually believed them. They were not like a lot of the Hollywood leading man type guys that we have seen for many years now. They were real and real. I liked this film when I was a teenager. I think it still is good now. It still is as good as it was when I saw it in the theater when I was a teen. If you are a teen, go see it because it is great!

Monday, 06 Apr 2020 14:48

The three British royals: Prince Charles, Princess Diana, and Prince Philip, are portrayed as the first victims of the sexual abuse of young children. The film is based on a true story that occurred in the late 60's. The film begins with the child molestation of two children, one named Baby and the other named Prince. The molestation continues through the rest of the film, except for a brief time where Baby is kissed by her father, the younger son of Prince Charles. The two girls are molested by Prince Phillip, and their father is also molested by Prince Charles. The film includes many interviews with victims and perpetrators, and has a lot of scenes of abuse that are not shown in the movie. The movie is quite a shocking film, and is a good story. But the film is far from a great film. There are several scenes that do not make sense, and the camera angles in some scenes are not very good. The acting is not good, either. Some of the actresses (and actresses in general) in the film are pretty awful. The only two good acting performances are from the two young actors, and one of the two older actors. Even the children are not very good in the film. Some of the scenes are quite disturbing, and some of the children are not very cute. The film is quite disturbing, and some of the scenes are quite disturbing. However, the film is worth seeing, and the director did an excellent job. My Rating: 7/10

Monday, 06 Apr 2020 11:29

The first few minutes of The Hunchback of Notre Dame is worth the price of admission alone. It is extremely entertaining, a bit long, but definitely worth the time. It follows the story of a young Italian boy who is taken from his family to marry a young lady from the royal family. The story is intriguing and the acting is excellent. It's an accurate portrayal of the Italian aristocracy. There are many good moments and the ending is heart wrenching. Unfortunately the film ends on a very bad note. The scene where the priest tells his story to the King is unbelievable. It's not like the priest is telling a story to the King, he's telling a story to a King to a King. I'm sure this was supposed to be funny but it's not. The King is going to tell his story to the Queen, and then the King is going to tell his story to his Queen. I don't know how he could be in the same room with her. This scene was a big let down. I guess it's a good movie because it's entertaining. However, it's a very long movie. It will be difficult for the average movie goer to stay focused on the movie. If you're bored, then it's worth watching. However, it's not the best movie ever.

Sunday, 05 Apr 2020 11:27

I recently watched a movie called "Abdul: A Love Story" that was directed by Nat Faxon. This movie is about Abdul Qayamat. A young man named Abdul Qayamat (Samuel L Jackson) is a Muslim from India who is just out of school and is working as a stock broker. His fiancee Alia (Shailene Woodley) has two children, Isla (Kaitlyn Dias) and Shiloh (Mena Suvari). Their marriage is a big success but, after a while, Alia goes back to her husband in Saudi Arabia, where she will be unable to attend her children's wedding. Now, while the news of her marriage is spreading, Abdul and Isla are separated. But they are reunited soon and the two start to get to know each other. A short time later, the two get married in a Saudi Arabia that is a few years after Abdul's departure. But, the place where they get married is not recognized by the government there. Then, Abdul learns that Isla and Shiloh have been kidnapped by their father. So, he sets out to rescue them from the country where they are still being held. It is a touching movie that shows the love between these two. Sam Jackson's performance was amazing, as he played the character of Abdul Qayamat. Shailene Woodley was also very good in this movie as the character of Alia. It was a movie that made me smile and I was very happy when it finished.

Saturday, 04 Apr 2020 03:54

It's a long time since I saw a film of this caliber, both in terms of production, production design, and production design. As I was watching this movie, I was reminded of some of the techniques that the film makers used to convey the themes that were so prominent in the original story. For example, the red/black color scheme that the film makers used was original, but was not used in any other film that I have seen. While I have not seen the original story, I do believe that the red/black color scheme was an excellent choice in this film. The movie kept me on the edge of my seat, and I always felt that there was a lot of history that the movie would be able to portray. While it was long, I do believe that the movie was quite entertaining. The acting was good, and the movie kept me interested throughout the film. I also felt that the film was able to pull at the heartstrings, and the way that the story was told was excellent. The movie does leave you with some questions, but I think that the film makers were able to give you the answer that you were looking for. Overall, I think that this is a very well-made film that you will enjoy. It is an excellent film that I would recommend.

Saturday, 04 Apr 2020 02:31

Well done! Don't get me wrong, this is a great movie, it is really well written, and the acting is superb, and it has a great cast. But what makes this film so good is that it's based on a true story. For a movie to have a true story it has to be true in the sense that it is based on a true incident. However the truth of the story is that Tazhani's family was the actual ones who raised him and wanted him to be a warrior for them. No other person in their right mind would have raised a child like this, and so they, or rather his mother, decided that she would raise him to be a warrior for them, not the other way around. Tazhani has lived a much better life than most people would live, and that is the only good thing that the movie can take from it's true story. But if you want to see a movie about the true story of how a child's life was, then see "The Star". It is far more interesting and will leave you with a better feeling.

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 05:15

I am not a big fan of the original. However, I had watched this movie on the news and wanted to see it. I did find the story to be fascinating and the acting was superb. I had to be a little disappointed in the end. I thought they could have done better with the conclusion. I was wrong. The film had everything going for it. The actors were great, the story was wonderful. I loved the cinematography and the photography. I also loved the history and the things that were told. I thought the historical value of this movie was a little overblown. It wasn't at all. I thought it was more of a love story than an historical documentary. However, the ending did have a certain sadness to it. I liked the message the movie was trying to get across. It was also interesting to see how this story was told. I recommend this movie. It is highly recommended.

Wednesday, 01 Apr 2020 20:19

I am a lover of musicals, and I have seen "A Thousand Years of Love" and "Annie" and many other musicals, and I found this one of the best movies I have seen in recent years. It was not a love story, but I liked the story of Muhammad Ali and his love for his religion. The "love" between Ali and Saffron Burrows, who plays Ali's wife, was convincing. I think the actor who played Ali's father was also good. There were a few scenes that made me want to scream "kill the director!" but those scenes were few and far between. My only complaint is that the movie seemed to go for an hour and a half too long. I watched the movie in English. It was really long. I would recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good musical. It is well worth seeing.

Monday, 30 Mar 2020 16:58

In the 1920s, an English actress (Dame Judi Dench) sets up a London theater that will show plays by Muslim women. Unfortunately, when she is first asked to audition for a role in a play she is told that the role is not for her. This is the start of the "Muslim Invasion of Britain". It is the 1950s and this movie tells the story of a teenage girl who is persecuted by her family and becomes a martyr for Islam. She is eventually saved by the British, who believe her to be a victim. I could not believe that this was a movie based on a true story. It was one of the most disappointing movies I have seen in a long time. I am a huge fan of Dame Judi Dench, and I really enjoyed this movie, but this was disappointing.

Terry Robertson

Sunday, 29 Mar 2020 09:25

The movie is excellent and definitely a worthy film to watch. The story of the kidnapping of Nizar Ali Khan is very well told. The story is based on true events of the kidnapping of Nizar Ali Khan. The movie is great and worth seeing. The movie focuses on the real life story of Nizar Ali Khan, a Kashmiri journalist who was kidnapped by Indian Army on June 17, 2005. The story of Nizar Ali Khan is well told and gives a real sense of what happened. The movie is a very good work, and a great addition to the Pakistani cinema.

Sunday, 29 Mar 2020 00:27

I've read some of the other comments and was a bit confused as to what the big deal was about this movie. Maybe I should have watched it in a cinema, but I was expecting more of a story about a great relationship and the deeper symbolism of it. Some have been saying it was a traditional love story, but it was more about the relationship between man and man than the one between man and woman. I think that was what the story was about. The man was not the only one to love her, there was a lot of love in the world. It was not just a one sided love story. I think the main message of this movie was about respecting and caring for one another and how we can overcome a lot of problems with our own will. I didn't get the answer about the elephant, but I did get a lot of deeper meaning about what the elephant represents. I really liked the music. I would recommend this movie, especially for people who like to study history.

Saturday, 28 Mar 2020 16:56

I was thoroughly impressed by this film and I think it's one of the best biopics I've seen in a long time. I love the acting and the story of the life of "Abdul" himself. It's wonderful to see him grow up and explore who he is. There's so much more to learn about this man, and I think this film does an amazing job in getting the audience into the way he felt and the places he explored. I think that this film was a huge improvement over "Life of Brian" and "The Royal Tenenbaums" and I think that was due to the fact that this film doesn't try to make the audience understand how you feel about these people. It just goes with the story and the style of the film. I think that the performances are phenomenal, as is the direction. I know that this film is not as entertaining as "Shakespeare in Love", but it's still an incredible film. I think that the life of Abdul is one of the greatest life stories ever told. I recommend it to anyone that is a fan of biopics and you need to see this film. It's one of the best movies I've seen in a long time.

Saturday, 28 Mar 2020 09:23

I cannot understand the negative reviews here. I have always loved this movie, and I really liked this one more than the first one. I just read one of those comments from a guy who wanted to know why the movie was "so bad" - he just said that he enjoyed the first one. Well, I have seen the first one, and I enjoyed it very much, and I believe that this one was better. It was a different story. The first one was based on a true story, but this one is based on the actual diary of a real-life person. I think this movie is much more engaging. I really like this movie. There are very few movies that I could watch every time it is on TV and I would not want to miss. I will give it a 7, and I am not recommending it to anyone else. I really liked it, and it is my favorite movie. This one is much better. So if you are looking for a good movie and you have not seen the first one yet, I would recommend it.

Saturday, 28 Mar 2020 00:27

The movie takes us on the journey of the great Abdul Karim as he attempts to redeem himself. In the process, he is confronted by some of the greatest men who have ever lived. One of these is the Roman Emperor, Caligula. When you have got the chance to meet with the man who conquered and educated the world, it is hard to put down on the screen. The life of Caligula is a dark and twisted tale, and at times, you feel a little dirty. I don't want to give away too much, but the movie takes us through the last decade of the Roman Empire, through the years of the reign of Nero, to the years of his nephew Tiberius. The movie starts off with the ancient Claudius, who was a friend and advisor to the emperor Claudius. During this time, Claudius is busy plotting the death of his nephew. Claudius is stabbed in the back, and Claudius' life is spared. However, Claudius has lost all of his empire and all of his power. He is forced to live in exile and has to look forward to another year, when his brother Tiberius, the ruler of Rome, will come to take over. Claudius meets with the emperor in the desert, where he begins to question why he is doing this. The emperor explains that Claudius was a friend of Tiberius and that the emperor is now trying to convince Claudius to run for emperor. Claudius begins to feel that he is being manipulated and decides to take a small step to assert his own will. After his fight with the emperor, he ends up in the middle of the desert, where he decides to go into a small cave to start over. He is faced with the terrible events that would unfold in his life, such as the persecution of Christians, the Emperor's son Nero, and his brother Caligula. He starts over, and begins to see things in a different light. The movie is highly acclaimed and was one of the biggest box office hits of 1997. The movie is a great adaptation of the novel, the novel being written by the great French writer Victor Hugo. The movie is directed by Jean-Jacques Annaud, who has done a fantastic job in this movie. The movie is based on a story that Jean-Jacques Annaud wrote himself. He was the producer, the writer and the director of the movie. This is not the first time that Jean-Jacques Annaud has adapted a novel. He directed the movie adaptation of the novel, The Seventh Seal, which is an adaptation of a true story. The movie takes us into the lives of a group of people who believe in Jesus Christ. There is the group of Apostles, who follow Jesus, the group of People who believe in him, and the group of followers of the christian faith. The movie portrays the life of these people and their beliefs in Jesus Christ. The movie was a huge hit and it was nominated for seven Academy Awards, including best picture, best director, best actor, best original screenplay, and best adapted screenplay. The movie was highly anticipated and the movie had a great start. This is the movie that it has been praised for. There is an audience that is looking forward to the movie and it is looking forward to another great year for the movie industry.

Friday, 27 Mar 2020 19:43

The idea of the film is that Ali and Bibi are sisters and never knew each other. They are orphans and have been separated since they were very young. Ali is Muslim and Bibi is not. In the film, they are forced to leave the country. One of the very nice things about this film is the special effects. It's really amazing to see the landscapes and the water that the characters are swimming in. It's just very interesting to see Ali, his life in Germany and his relationship with the older woman who is watching over him. It's also interesting to see how Ali and Bibi get along. I love that Bibi is a big city girl and Ali is a simple town boy. I also love that the film has a very simple storyline, something that makes it easy to understand. It's also interesting to see how Ali's friends relate to Ali, and how his family members relate to Ali. I also love the way Ali finds out about Bibi and how Ali deals with it. I love the way they show Ali's younger years when he's getting married. I also love that Ali's wife is not very happy about her husband's involvement in the marriage. I think that the story in the film is a very touching one. I think the best thing about the film is the special effects. I also like that it has a good message about how each person, whether or not they are Muslim, can find peace with their God. I also really like that the movie is made in Berlin, Germany. It's just really nice to see all the different faces and landscapes of Berlin. It's a nice city that I love to go to, and I like that the film is set in a very different part of Germany. Overall, I think this is a really good film and I recommend it to people. I think it's a very good film about a complicated subject and I think it's a great film. It's not the greatest film of all time, but it's a good film. The special effects are great and I really love how the movie was set in Germany.

Catherine Richardson

Friday, 27 Mar 2020 09:21

Richard Harris, along with Joan Allen, bring the British Grand Opera to the screen in the movie "Richard Harris: the legend" starring Tilda Swinton and Richard Harris. Harris plays Mozart, a man who died young and had an enormous impact on the world. Swinton plays Anna, the queen who wishes to make the acquaintance of Mozart. Together they try to communicate with the deceased composer. They are unsuccessful, but they have a wonderful time. The movie itself is pretty good. Some parts of the movie are a bit too long and it is a bit boring, but it is also entertaining. The special effects are incredible, especially the wedding scene, but they can be overdone and a bit childish. This movie is definitely not for everyone, but if you love Richard Harris and Tilda Swinton then this is definitely one to see. (7/10)

Monday, 23 Mar 2020 17:22

For those of you who haven't seen the film, I've been meaning to write about this film for a long time, since I first read about it years ago. It was the year 1996 and I had just finished my MA in Sociology, but was able to write my thesis and intern with the university's Film and Television Program on Muslim Culture. It was the time of the Arab Spring, and the film was made by a team of international students and a film student from the University of Manchester, UK. A few years later, the film was finally released and I was able to view it again, since the students had been promoted as a part of the department and were in the process of planning a festival. This time, I was able to catch the film in the theater and it was the best experience of my life. I had to understand the Muslim culture and in particular the early Islamic history, as it was very difficult to be able to fully comprehend such a huge subject. And I learned, in particular, that the first Muslim King was a kind of mystic. I've been searching for this film for years and finally found it. I watched the film twice and understood so much more about the culture and history. Although I'm not familiar with the many other films on this subject, I was able to understand them, as well. Although the film is not a great movie and I've heard complaints about it, it's definitely worth watching. The Arabic language was my favorite. I'm glad I've finally been able to watch it again.

Monday, 23 Mar 2020 13:31

This film chronicles the relationship between the Prince of Wales and the Earl of Wessex between 1803 and 1818. The film is set during the first decade of the 19th century. The film is mainly set in the US, with special focus on what happened in the American colonies, although the British Empire was not mentioned at all. In 1803, the Prince of Wales was asked by the Earl of Wessex to come and visit him in London. However, due to his physical and mental limitations, he was unable to meet the Earl and return with him, so he stayed in England with the Earl's wife and daughter. It is quite difficult to say what happened next. However, in 1805, Charles met his son, who was now a man and not an infant. Charles quickly left his father's side and returned to London, but was unable to make peace with the Duke of Buckingham (the Earl of Nottingham) and had to leave again. Charles returned to London in 1809 where he was once again ill and fell into a coma, but was given the right to claim his rightful place on the throne by the Duke of Buckingham. Charles' wife, Mary (Bridget Fonda) visited him one night at the royal hospital in London. Charles was asked by his daughter, Jane (Julia Roberts), to help her with her writing. Charles was later able to write on the throne and Elizabeth of York (Sally Hawkins) visited Charles in his bed in England. However, Charles was not able to leave England for the Netherlands as he was too ill. Charles spent a lot of time at the hospital in London with his sister and was very ill. He also wanted to take part in his father's war against the English, so he agreed to help his father in the war, but could not return to the throne because of his illness. It was the Earl of Hertford (Meryl Streep) who helped his son to write and get a scholarship to Oxford University, which he did in 1814. It was also his son's son, Harry (Kiefer Sutherland), who wrote the play, A Marriage of Honor, which was made into a film by Kenneth Branagh. The film is set in England in 1805. It is the year of the Russian Revolution and the American Civil War. The film is pretty dark. It is so bad that it is probably worth seeing just for the acting. At times, the actors make you cringe. It is an interesting film, but I think that if you can get past the bad acting, you will enjoy the story. There are some great historical facts about Charles and his relationship with his father. Overall, the film is not good, but you can tell that it is a historical drama. It is not the most interesting movie of the year, but you could tell that the actors have worked really hard. There are a few good scenes in the film, but they are not enough to make it a good movie. It is recommended only to people who enjoy historical dramas.

See all 22 reviews

Write a review