x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch King Georges

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(448) 6.8 77 min 2015

King Georges is a movie starring Nicholas Elmi and Georges Perrier. Documentary about Philadelphia restaurateur Georges Perrier and the closing of his iconic restaurant, Le Bec-Fin.

Starring: Georges Perrier, Nicholas Elmi

Genres: Documentary, Biography

Director: Erika Frankel

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Documentary, Biography
Director	Erika Frankel
Writer	Erika Frankel
Stars	Georges Perrier, Nicholas Elmi
Country	USA
Runtime	1H 17M
Description	Documentary about Philadelphia restaurateur Georges Perrier and the closing of his iconic restaurant, Le Bec-Fin.

Download documentary «King Georges»

Blu-ray
13.3 GB

Customers who watched «King Georges» also watched

23 customer reviews about biography «King Georges»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 13:29

I'm going to start by saying that this is an incredible documentary, and if you are a doctor or a health nut, you will enjoy this documentary. The American Health News, and similar magazines, all make the same points, the same information. The documentary really shows a whole host of Health Fads that have no medical basis. You have HIV, circulatory problems (as doctors do not believe a vital organ could be damaged), and breast cancer, for example. A cancer diagnosis may not be as clear cut as you think. I would recommend this documentary to everyone, and you can watch it whenever you want.

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 23:48

In both the French Revolution and the French Revolution, the original French title, "La Galette de Saint-Denis," is the more contemporary and informative of the two titles. In France, the film was actually shot in 1984. The plot centers around the life of Henriette Galette, the first woman to hold the title of "King of France," who in 1818 became the first queen of the French monarchy. She was born Henriette de Lassigny, and later, "King of the French." Henriette was a gifted artist, and this history of her life and art is based on historical documents. She was born on September 23, 1761. At age eight, she was married to Joseph de Moles, a friend of the French royal family, and the two had three children. When the 1818 revolution broke out, Henriette had already fled to England, but she was discovered by the government and sent to prison. She spent three years in prison, and was forced to learn how to read and write French. While incarcerated, she discovered that the French Revolution was being carried out by her father, who had been assassinated as a revolutionary leader. Henriette went to court to make a complaint, but was informed that no man could make a complaint, so she was held in jail until she was twenty years old. There, she learned that her father had been assassinated because he had grown too proud to be a revolutionary leader. One year later, on October 30, 1820, she became the first queen of France, and she was coronated on December 12, 1821. After her coronation, Henriette fell into poverty. She had no wealth, and no education. Her three children from her marriage, Lucie, Henriette's eldest daughter, Jean, and Catherine, her youngest daughter, were poor and had to work in their father's stable. They were both either sick or disabled. Her daughter was paralyzed from the waist down. As she grew older, Henriette began to feel that she had been cheated. Her health was failing, and she became interested in painting. She was also interested in the life and poetry of the past, and she started to write poetry, which she made a book of, "The Story of Henriette de Lassigny." In 1825, she gave birth to Louis-Joseph, who died of anemia in the early 1900s. She had a daughter, Marie-Claire, who died a few years later. These facts are based on documents and historical documents. The documentary also explains that Henriette is a hero of the French Revolution because she acted as an agent for her family and helped them escape from the prison to freedom. The documentary is good in showing how her life changed after her coronation. This documentary has historical significance because it gives an account of the historical events that led up to her coronation, and it also shows the events that led to her death, and the acts of violence and the overthrow of the French monarchy. The documentary is accurate in showing the part of her life that the documentary focuses on. She was a great woman who made her accomplishments her life. However, the documentary does not cover everything about her life. There is a lot of research into her life and accomplishments that is not included in the documentary.

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 16:18

As I do not know much about Jimmy Savile or his work I think I may be biased. I find it hard to believe that this man could have done this. The fact that he could pull off so many acts so successfully on so many different levels is just not something that seems to be in the cards for a few, let alone him. I've seen many documentaries and shows about the Savile scandal and have heard many of the stories, but I've never heard a story that is so poignant. In this documentary we hear from women who lived with him in the late 70s and early 80s. In these women's own words they tell stories of the many abuses and perversions they suffered at the hands of this man. They tell their stories about how he made them feel helpless and afraid to speak up and to leave him, but yet they refused to leave him even when they knew that they would lose everything. At the end of the day, all they wanted was for someone to listen and they were willing to sacrifice everything they had for a chance to be heard and believed. I thought this film was well done and well acted. I also think that the documentaries that have been made about Savile have been too wordy. I think this documentary was a little long, but it was well worth it. I have watched it over and over again.

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 02:37

Just a few hours after I saw this movie, I was reading reviews and reviews from people who'd seen it and they said the same thing: that "the real James Brown was really Billie Holiday. not so much as you'd think." Then there were those who felt it was just an excellent look at a great man. Apparently, some of the articles I read were based on the beliefs of people who never met the great singer. There is such a huge difference between the two. Billie was half-black, half-white and half-Cuban. He was really "black" and his music was black. Everyone was always talking about how he was the only black singer in the music scene, and when he was on stage, the whole audience was raving. Not one person complained. And nobody thought he was different. He was not a black singer at all. He was black, but as a man who lived in a society that ignored blacks, he was a real man. And the thing is, he was still singing and playing the guitar while he was alive. And I'm sorry, but the differences between Billie and the real James Brown were just as striking. But I will say that the documentary at times can be dry, but it is well worth watching.

Monday, 06 Apr 2020 01:12

This documentary was superbly done. I was very impressed with how sensitively it dealt with matters such as the history of the mythological evil/good powers (the Silver Serpent and the Devil). And of course the shocking irony of the human element. I was quite surprised to see the images of the psychiatric hospitals in Lesbos; what made me to see this film. I thought it was very enlightening and useful in the sense that it helped me to become more aware of the influence of religion in modern society. I also feel that the man that played "Doc", David Benham, was magnificent. He embodied the essence of the role that the principal characters were expected to play in this film. I recommend it highly.

Monday, 06 Apr 2020 01:10

Watched this documentary about Georges DuBarry. I'm a big fan of his songs, and I was shocked by the things he did to get his songs heard. I really liked the man, but I can understand that people wouldn't be so welcoming to his "gay" lifestyle. Georges certainly had problems. And I was disappointed with the music he produced. I could understand the arguments Georges makes in his "homosexuality" song, but I didn't hear any music of the bands he had recorded. The documentary is really great. I could understand that not all people would like this story, and some of the songs Georges produced were a little embarrassing. But, it's really interesting. Even if you don't like the music of Georges, you can still learn a lot from the man. There's no "gay" music, but you can listen to the albums from the early years of his career. And, if you're a fan of the music, the movie is also great. It's really a wonderful tribute to a true American icon. He truly was a great man, and it's good to know his story. The documentary itself is very well done. Some scenes are hard to watch, but I don't think it really detracts from the quality of the film. This documentary also contains some great interviews with people around Georges, such as David Duchovny and some others. There's some very touching moments in the movie, but I'm not sure if this is a documentary for everyone. However, if you're a fan of Georges, you have to watch this movie. It's very heartwarming, and is an inspiring story.

Saturday, 04 Apr 2020 19:02

Well, I like Martin Scorsese, and I also like documentary-style, multi-generational interviews. The reality is that this film does tell a compelling story, with a lot of truthfulness and humour. It's also a bit of a boring film, in that it's fairly episodic, so it's hard to really understand what's going on with everybody. I think there are a lot of small bits of truth and "right-on" psychology going on in this film, but they aren't really explored enough to make a better story out of. There's an interesting contrast here between the beauty of nature, and the horror of the human mind. We see the catastrophic effects of man's "pet project" in nature, but also the healthy changes that humans do to the natural environment (what we call "conservation") and in human psychology. In other words, the psychological effects are far greater than the effects of man's destruction of nature. On the other hand, there are many insightful bits of psychology that the film doesn't do well with. One really interesting, but buried moment is the distinction between the differences between white trash and poor, working class people. I thought it was a great moment to have, but it was mostly pretty obscure. Also, I found that it wasn't really that interesting of a topic. The other point is that the film isn't very unique. It's basically a "conservation" documentary, but it's basically about conservation in nature, and it's basically about white trash. It's definitely more about conservation than about white trash, but the film isn't really that original. It's very easy to see that Scorsese is coming from the same place that others have been before him. All of the characters in this film are about the same as the characters in any other Scorsese film. I also think that the emphasis on the white trash crowd is rather cliched. It's an interesting idea, but I felt that it was just about setting the bar too high for the white trash people. Also, the "white trash" part isn't really relevant to the real story. I think that the white trash people are the major protagonist in the story, and the focus of this film. The real story isn't about white trash people, it's about human psychology, and the psychology of the white trash people is even more interesting, in that it's far more interesting and fascinating than anything that might happen to them. Overall, I think that this film is interesting. The psychological effect is well-explained, and the human psychology aspects are explored well. There are also a lot of interesting bits of psychology that are buried within the film, that add to the complexity of the story. It's also interesting to see how people deal with being around "pet projects". I wouldn't call this film a masterpiece, but I'd certainly say that it's a good documentary-style film. I would recommend it, but I don't think that it's much different from many other good documentaries, in that there's a lot of background and story that you don't get a lot of time to get really absorbed in. I didn't hate it, but I think that this film is more of a disappointment than a great film. I give it a 7/10, but the biggest problem is that I didn't really understand why the main character was as stressed as he was. There is no obvious reason.

Saturday, 04 Apr 2020 02:33

This is a superb documentary which examines the causes of the addiction to cocaine and heroin, from its beginning, to today. Based on interviews with doctors, psychologists, social workers and others, it shows how the society demonized them and how they continue to suffer. Drugs are not the culprits, but the users, their families, and society. This is not just a movie. It is a call for us all to treat our citizens with respect and to give them a chance to live happy and productive lives. This film is so effective that I've never seen such a touching, informative, and entertaining documentary before. It shows us the struggle, the exhaustion, the shame, and the hope that each person who consumes drugs must face. This is not just a movie, it is a call for us all to treat our citizens with respect and to give them a chance to live happy and productive lives.

Friday, 03 Apr 2020 19:00

French filmmaker Sissy Spacek is hardly known for her political films. But here she seems to have produced a film that is of equal importance. The story is not new - it has been told in "The Bush Diaries", in the books of "Chas de Landeau" and in the documentary "The Bush Diaries" - but it is told very well, and in a straightforward way, about how a couple - an elderly woman and her two children - saved their farm by building a school, a swimming pool, and other facilities to feed and educate the children. As a documentary, "French School" is a bit dated - but there are many images that carry lasting power. The film includes interviews with the woman's children and her grandchildren. This is particularly true of the oldest child. As a family, the viewer is shown how she feels about her grandmother and her children, and how she thinks about how she lives in her house and how she feels about life - and about the world in which she lives. That's the real message of the film - about living in peace, and living in peace with others. This isn't just an American film - the people who have written about this film in France have written about the film in the US as well. And, in the end, this is a French film. We don't get a lot of "non-American" films from French filmmakers, but this is a good film, and it has a lot of important ideas. If you ever have a chance to see it, watch it - even if you are not an American.

Friday, 03 Apr 2020 03:56

I just finished watching this film, and I'm left completely speechless. It was emotionally devastating to watch the father and son relationship unfold, to witness the demons they had to endure. The DVD comes with an extra 15-minute segment that tells the story from both perspectives of the parents. It was the most human and poignant story that I've ever seen. There is no other way to describe how this film could have been so powerful. I can't even imagine how much it affected the other person in my house who also suffered. Just be prepared to be moved, and you will be grateful to have seen this film. I urge everyone to watch it. It will change your life.

Wednesday, 01 Apr 2020 15:39

Professor Robin Wells, (University of Maryland) argues that in a world of mountains, forests and deserts, the world of man has little meaning. According to Wells, man has little meaning and hence cannot be compared to a post-industrial society where man needs to work and values money above all else. While this is an excellent presentation of the arguments of the environmental movement, it falls short of an objective analysis of the man-nature conflict. It also suffers from a rushed tone, which is distracting from the film's overall effect. The world's problems are explained in technical terms but the film doesn't really show the effects of these problems. To this end, the film is worth seeing, even if the arguments in the film are not convincing.

Wednesday, 01 Apr 2020 14:14

Seen in 2010, this documentary is about a great deal of different characters. George Washington, who was the President of the US, wrote a paper to many people. The paper was revolutionary. His is not only famous, but also controversial and interesting. This is an amazing documentary. George Washington was the most controversial president of all time. He was some sort of famous president, famous for writing letters to the people of the country. At the same time, he was not that well known. You only had one chance to see this man and it was really incredible. As the documentary showed, he had many problems with his health. He was an incredible man, maybe the most famous man of his time. But his health problems were really not public knowledge. When the French wrote a book about George Washington, people had a really hard time to see that man and to understand him. It is really funny that many people went to see this documentary and, in the end, they felt so inadequate. To see that a great man had such a hard time to see his face in the public! This documentary is really good, very good. Even if some people got kind of smart in this documentary, it is really amazing.

Tuesday, 31 Mar 2020 14:12

Clueless, screwed-up - and a deeply disturbed individual who despite all his bumbling and maiming, still managed to be charismatic, witty, and talented. "Georges" should be available to buy on DVD, but in fairness the inclusion of the footage from the premiere of "The Treasure of the Sierra Madre" (1968) has an adverse affect on the impact of the film - two-thirds of it filmed on the stage where Georges was played by the late legendary Edward G. Robinson (see the comment by Pat Sullivan in the "Deadhead" section of the "X-Box" section of this site). I didn't know Georges well, having only seen a few of his films (i.e., "The Gold Rush" and "The Jungle Book"). Anyway, "Georges" is truly one of the very best and most beautifully constructed American films I've seen in a while. And then there's Jane Fonda! The attention to detail in this film is amazing - the casting of all the supporting roles, with the exception of the chief villain's role, is spot-on (including Andrew Gower's performance as the villain's on-screen assistant); the casting of the California desert locations in the opening credits, and of "The Gold Rush" itself (as well as for "The Jungle Book" and "A Horse Named Charlie"), are also perfect; especially the commentary track by "Wolfgang Petersen" with John Huston is a tour-de-force of storytelling insight, and of a human being who, despite all his flaws, tried to give his life the best he could. And he succeeded in the end. A star-making performance by Fonda, who once again shows the power of being unafraid to confront her demons and succeed at the end of her acting career.

Monday, 30 Mar 2020 15:35

There's no denying that Georges "the Hero" Bazin is a true comic genius. He can provide information with his mind and actions. However, the technicals that allow him to do this has a real downside. It really is difficult to record what Bazin says. Also, his voice sounds weird sometimes. Some of the interviews are done in French and this makes them even more confusing. This is also true for the interviews with his companions. It is amazing to see how different the people of the time were. But I think this is a good thing. We cannot know what they really thought. I find this work of art fascinating because it shows that those people who were in the world of Henri Duque during the 1920s had a lot of influence on his thought. This makes them really special. For this reason, I give "Hands Up" 10 out of 10.

Monday, 30 Mar 2020 08:04

We are in the process of editing this film and I cannot stress enough how much it is in the nature of a documentary. What is shown here is a disturbing and disturbing story of human nature and the possible destiny of our planet. This is a very important film to tell the story of our planet and our own fate.

Monday, 30 Mar 2020 06:39

This documentary is a great example of the fine work of the Humanities in the classroom. It is a powerful educational tool which provides valuable examples for students of all ages. It also makes a powerful statement about the meaning of education in today's society. The most powerful aspects of this film are that it conveys the joy, happiness, joy, and impact of learning in a non-dramatic way. The students, teachers, and the parents all made it clear that this was a truly inspirational film. A truly educational film that will positively influence many generations to come. This is the best lesson that I've ever learned. I encourage everyone to watch this film and create their own lessons.

Saturday, 28 Mar 2020 09:25

As a long time fan of Australian cinema, I had never heard of the films of Clive Bunting before watching this documentary. Bunting is perhaps the most notorious of the silent movie directors, and he was a major influence on many of the directors who would later make the silent film revolution. There is an evident passion in his films, and he is clearly the "father" of the silent film movement. The documentary is fascinating, but I was more interested in Bunting's directing style. There is a definite sense of mood to his films, with a slightly quirky style, a style that is not easily accessible to the mainstream audience, but which definitely makes his movies stand out in the scene. Bunting was one of the first directors to use sound during his silent films. Unfortunately, with such a heavy budget, many of the silent films of the mid 1800's were shot with a hand held camera and was difficult to edit. In Bunting's films, we are able to hear the actors dialogue. There are a number of great early silent films, but I can think of few that were shot with a hand held camera, and the problem of removing the sounds is another factor that slowed the pacing of the film. Bunting did not choose to take away the sounds when he first filmed his films, but then slowly began to use the sounds extensively. He gradually incorporated the sound effects, and they appear in almost every single Bunting film that is known. I was surprised to see how many of the contemporary filmmakers interviewed in the documentary were vocal about their memories of Bunting's direction. I will not mention all of Bunting's films, but there is a couple of standouts. In his "The Horse And His Boy" (1906), we can hear the horses neighing through the silent film. Bunting also used several locations in Australia. While most of the shots were in rural areas, he did take shots in towns and cities. One such shot is in the same town, Melbourne, where the movie opens. Bunting never filmed in such a large city before, but he did put shots in the city of Melbourne. In "The King Of Spirits" (1913), we can hear the dogs howl, which is reminiscent of the film "The White Dog", in which two dogs, a boxer and his manger, walk through the grass in a village. Again, Bunting used a few locations in Australia, but he was able to create many scenes in rural areas. The Man With Two Brains (1919), is a beautiful film with a quiet, somewhat surreal look. There is a fantastic soundtrack that matches the mood of the scene. We can hear a wide variety of instruments, and hear these scenes in the background of the movie. The film also has a beautiful look that is reminiscent of Bunting's "Sleepy Hollow". A typical Bunting film was "The Clansman" (1921), which was not an independent film, but was Bunting's first movie and, most importantly, it was his first movie to be released in colour. This is a fantastic film, and probably one of the greatest silent films ever made. It is a film that has influenced many other filmmakers, but it was not known at the time, and I hope it is not forgotten. The documentary is amazing, but not for the history buffs. If you are a Bunting fan, I recommend this documentary to you.

Pamela Franklin

Thursday, 26 Mar 2020 16:54

I have been reading reviews of this film for the last 5 years and to be quite frank I was not looking forward to seeing this documentary. However, with a few exceptions, they have been very biased and one thing that stuck out to me about the films they have reviewed was that they were solely based on my opinion. The two guys, however, were insightful and did their best to disprove the main claim in the film, namely the accuracy of the statistics in the film. They were both excellent at showing the controversy behind the statistics and how they were contested by several groups. They completely shut down a point that was pushed in the film by some people who only cared about the general idea that "the great masses of people" did not want to adopt the system. One guy even went on record stating that he didn't even know "where to begin" when it came to interpreting the statistics. The other guy was kind enough to translate the statistics into an English version for us, which would be a good tool to have in your arsenal if you're going to listen to a documentary. I will certainly be watching this again.

Thursday, 26 Mar 2020 10:47

I watched this in a documentary class at school, and this film shows the truth behind just how close we are to living in a dictatorship. It shows just how inhumane the anti-communist regime was, and how it manipulated people to turn against each other in an attempt to gain the power they could never really have. I must admit that I am not a fan of Michael Moore, but his ability to point out the truth is amazing. I am a big fan of Richard Spencer's YouTube channel and I recently bought this film, and I am glad I did, because I can now not only see just how ridiculous, and destructive, our current era has become, but also see how far we have come since the '70s. I think the film is still relevant to us today, and I will watch it again. Many of us have lost hope, and I can see why some of us have turned our backs on hope for all of our countries.

Monday, 23 Mar 2020 15:33

This film is a portrait of a story told in many languages around the world. These are the stories of the world's most famous musical composers. And how they create and execute their works. The characters are known to the viewers and their stories are told, with some historical background and a glimpse at their lives before they became famous. There is one story of how Georges' family life began. They had so little money and he did not have a decent education. That had already changed after he became famous. Another story tells of the times of 1930s - 40s when he became a popular singer in Poland. He was influenced by the fashions of the time. The story of Georges and his music, after decades of working in obscurity, is great. The music and the stories are incredible. The filmmakers are close to the music and the composers. They explain the pieces so clearly. There are lots of interviews with musicians and composers. They give some old and new music and present a brief biography of each composer. This film is a must see for music lovers and people interested in the history of music. It has been a long time since I saw such a good documentary. I was particularly surprised by the story of Fernando Veloso, I think he was one of the best composers of our times. I think he could make us think about our life, because he had this idea of how we should live and what we should do in our life. I have some hope for our future, if we listen to his music. He has many small songs in many languages that are good. I hope he will do a lot of great work in the future.

Monday, 23 Mar 2020 14:43

What an astonishing film, based on the autobiography of America's greatest comedian, James Carville, who has written and told this story, and on its improbable, inspiring and definitive vision. The fact that America has given a lifetime of bravery to any politician who wants to use its voice, its institutions, its funding, its energy, in support of its President to carry out his agenda is a remarkable achievement. The film is about the political career of Donald Trump and the likely electoral victory he could have had in the 2016 US Presidential Election, as the first Republican nominee in US history. It's a story of his rise to power, his rise to the presidency, his setbacks and his development of a massive, bigoted and delusional candidacy that managed to outsmart the political establishment in both parties. He had to get all the many elements of the media industry and the movie-making industry to play along with his campaign and to give him as much power as possible, to shape the public perception of him. How did he get that much power? The strength of the film comes from the interviewees, each of whom describes their most memorable and essential role in Trump's rise to power. This is also a documentary on a unique and unique person. The interviewees are experts in their fields, who offer a fresh perspective on the subject that is unique and no-one else has mentioned. It also reminds us of the true hero of this story. James Carville describes himself as a cross between Joe McCarthy and the Wizard of Oz: the one who shapes the media and defines how politics is done. He then discusses what a very unusual role he had and how he played it brilliantly. The film is well edited and superbly produced, and it is well done with beautiful photography, a witty and humorous script and interesting interviews with some of the key figures. Donald Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton had many ramifications for his career, but nothing that came close to the consequences of what he's seen in his political career. In the film, he talks about how it's his ambition to win the Presidency in the US Presidential Election that motivated him to become more confident, self-confident and proactive. It is also his desire to be the centre of attention, which led to his incessant attacks on the media and his attacks on his opponents. In the film he talks about his career and career highs, his personal highs, his career lows, his career regrets and his career successes. The only one who is not in the film is Donald Trump himself. There are only three people who have never spoken in the film, because the conversations about Donald Trump were so brief. One is Oprah Winfrey, the legendary and brilliant political personality who is critical of Donald Trump. Another is Steve Bannon, a Republican strategist and the former leader of Breitbart, a website which has a very small audience. The third is Dan Quayle, who had a one-time business relationship with Trump and whom he considered to be a very good friend. In a rare interview, Donald Trump himself speaks briefly and candidly about his politics and his career, but is not recorded. His speech is on average more than ten minutes long and the subject matter is difficult for a business man who has run for President. Although it's an interview with Donald Trump, it is a very different interview. It's almost a documentary about a different Donald Trump. He is a brash, arrogant, ignorant, racist, xenophobic, misogynistic, racist, authoritarian, egotistical, sexist and greedy character. He is not credible as a man, and he is not credible as a presidential candidate. That's why it is so difficult for him to come up with a rationale, to present a vision of his presidency. So when he says it's not about being President, it's about being President. He is very insecure, and we see in the film his narcissistic, egocentric, self-centered personality as the justification for his own ambitions. The interviewees describe him as a sociopath who doesn't appreciate empathy and doesn't want to understand other people. The film shows how he

Monday, 23 Mar 2020 08:19

One thing that stands out in this documentary is the timeline. For the longest time, the government was so afraid of what was going to happen that the government shutdown of all-out censorship of the press was in the works. And as more and more details are uncovered, it becomes clear that this was in fact a worldwide conspiracy of sorts. But after the truth comes out, the conspiracy is so massive, it can't be contained. People just don't make mistakes like this anymore. It is simply too big. This film follows the life of Georges, the man who convinced the French to go ahead with this blackout, and has remained in exile ever since. The truth will come out one day. That day is coming. For now, we know that the truth will out eventually.

Monday, 23 Mar 2020 07:39

With the stellar performances of Tilda Swinton and Julianne Moore, American HISTORY X is one of the best biopics of all time. It tells the story of a couple who fights for their daughter's life in the Bronx. Their fight is one of a few that was going on in America at the time. And that fights is not easy to see through. It was a moment of fear and hope for a nation, and it's a place that still feels very foreign to the people of America. The film shows how shocking it was for these people to try to save their child, and it shows that sometimes, it's all just not worth it. This is one of the best films I have seen about this tragedy, and it is amazing.

See all 23 reviews

Write a review