x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Among the Believers

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(753) 7.6 84 min 2015

Among the Believers is a movie starring Abdul Aziz and Pervez Hoodbhoy. An unsettling and eye opening exploration into the spread of the radical Islamic school Red Mosque in Pakistan, which trains legions of children to devote their...

Starring: Pervez Hoodbhoy, Abdul Aziz

Genres: Documentary, War, News, Biography

Director: Mohammed Naqvi, Hemal Trivedi

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Documentary, War, News, Biography
Director	Mohammed Naqvi, Hemal Trivedi
Writer	Jonathan Goodman Levitt
Stars	Pervez Hoodbhoy, Abdul Aziz
Country	USA, Pakistan
Also Known As	Miedzy wyznawcami, Jihadistskolan, Jihadistien koulu
Runtime	1H 24M
Description	An unsettling and eye opening exploration into the spread of the radical Islamic school Red Mosque in Pakistan, which trains legions of children to devote their lives to jihad, or holy war, from a very young age.

Download documentary «Among the Believers»

Blu-ray
13.37 GB

Windows
5.07 GB

Customers who watched news «Among the Believers» also watched

22 customer reviews about war «Among the Believers»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 11:41

In a rare public appearance, President Lyndon B. Johnson, President from 1965 to 1969, gives a riveting and persuasive account of his efforts to end the Vietnam War in the early 1960s. This is a landmark interview, because it is not a history lecture or political statement, but rather a look at a time when the country was at a crossroads. LBJ, who at the time was in his mid-40s, explains his initial reluctance to support the war and how he came to support it, leading to a reevaluation of his own values and his foreign policy. Johnson has not always been a great listener, but in this interview he is clear and effective. He does not shy away from issues, but is not shy about the political stakes. Johnson tells the story of his family, his youth, and his years as a college professor. He also recounts his youth as a Cub Scout leader, his success as a politician, and his determination to end the war. Johnson also looks back at his presidency and is candid in his assessment of the results. The most fascinating parts of the interview are when Johnson is asked about the racial attitudes of his time. His answer is illuminating and refreshing. While he talks about the relationship between race and class, he never equivocates, saying that he was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. He knows that the civil rights movement had a profound effect on the nation, and he reflects on his own race relations during his first term. He gives the interviewer the impression that he never wanted the Civil Rights Act to pass. He believes that it was his responsibility as president to get it passed, and that he was responsible for its passage because he saw that the majority of Americans wanted it. The interviewer also asks Johnson about his relationships with Martin Luther King, Jr., when he was at the University of Chicago, and the struggles of the civil rights movement, and he says that they were never really close, though they were friends. He tells the interviewer that he was not a very good friend of King. He also tells the interviewer that King's contribution to the civil rights movement was one that he wanted to do more, but did not want to become too involved. He was also unimpressed by the Black Panther Party, saying that it was the sort of organization that he would not have supported. He tells the interviewer that he wanted to focus on the problems facing the country. He has said that he is not as much interested in issues of race as he is in the economic condition of the country. He is also a fan of the Beatles and says that he wanted to hear the music in the White House, which he never got to do. Johnson, who speaks with an impressive command of the English language, also offers the interviewer some commentary on the civil rights movement. In a sense, he is doing the interview himself. His directness is sometimes overwhelming. He does not have time to take a long break and talk to a lawyer. He also does not want to get bogged down in the details of the Civil Rights Act, and he makes sure that the interview is interesting. In the end, this is a very moving and important interview, one that should be listened to. While it is not a complete history, it is a fascinating look at a time when the country was changing, and it does not preach at you. I enjoyed this interview, and would recommend it to anyone interested in the era.

Evelyn Gonzalez

Monday, 06 Apr 2020 11:38

I found this movie very interesting, and that is because it depicts a man in a historical time, that is "World War II." What the movie shows is what happened during the war. I enjoyed the narration. I also found it interesting that they did not put a lot of emphasis on what Hitler did or didn't do. I think this is what the movie was trying to show, how they did not focus on Hitler's time in power, or his crimes, or anything that is "historical." I would have liked to have seen a little more emphasis on what the Nazis did, as well as what the Allies did. They also showed the moral battle between the Allies and the Nazis, in a very entertaining way. I thought the director did a great job in showing the atrocities, and how many were committed during the war. I would recommend this movie to anyone who enjoys history and watching a good movie.

Sunday, 05 Apr 2020 12:59

This documentary about the "Fuhrer's War" in WWII is a fascinating look at the human cost of the conflict, and the experiences of many of the individuals who lived through it. The documentary is also extremely well-made, with excellent performances from the entire cast. I was especially impressed by the performances of the two main characters, Major Dieter Lang and Dr. Franz Xaver Bormann. The former, a German doctor who was involved in the planning of the German plan to invade the Soviet Union, is very convincing in his testimony, and the latter, a Jew who was deported to the Soviet Union, is also very convincing in his testimony. Both actors are highly deserving of their Oscars. The film also features a few other people who were involved in the war, including the head of the German Navy, Lt. Colonel Karl Kautsky, and the Chief of the German High Command, Admiral Karl Schellenberg. The film is also very well-made, with some very effective close-ups of the faces of the people who were in the bunker, as well as the black-and-white footage of the execution of the captured Soviet officers. The film is also well-made in its use of music, which is a crucial aspect of the documentary. The music is very effective, and the music is used effectively throughout the film. Overall, the documentary is a very well-made film, and it is highly recommended.

Elizabeth Myers

Saturday, 04 Apr 2020 06:54

I don't know why this film was nominated for Best Documentary Feature. I think that people who think this is a great documentary are missing out on a lot. The film is divided into six sections, and each section is a great film. I particularly like the first two sections. I think this is an important and important documentary. It should have gotten more exposure. I think that this film should have been nominated for Best Documentary Feature at the Oscars. But, it was not. I think that the most important part of the film is the last section, the one about the history of the first settlers. I think that this is the best part of the film. I recommend it to everyone.

Christopher Marshall

Friday, 03 Apr 2020 14:20

I was very skeptical about this documentary because I had been very skeptical about the war in Iraq. I had always thought that Iraq was the worst possible place to go for a war. But this documentary did a good job of explaining why this war was necessary. It also showed the good that came out of the war. It also showed that this war was the first war in American history to be won by a democratic government. But it also showed the bad that came out of the war. It showed that this war was not a war to save the world, but a war to make America stronger. It also showed that the war was not won because of Saddam Hussein, but because of the American people. The film was also very informative, as well as very emotional. I thought that it was very well done and it was a good film to see. I would recommend this documentary to everyone who wants to know more about the war in Iraq.

Friday, 03 Apr 2020 06:52

It's amazing how much this documentary has changed my views of the war in Vietnam. I had always thought of the war in Vietnam as a purely American problem. I am now glad to see that most Americans, including many of my own friends, are now sympathetic to the plight of the Vietnamese and their people. The time and money spent in the process of planning, coordinating, and executing the war were greatly wasted, in my opinion. The veterans who were killed were a tragedy, but so were the lives of the soldiers who did not live to see the end of the war. I think the directors and writers did a great job of representing the other side of the story. The effects of the war are a tragedy for many, but I have no doubt that many of the soldiers who were killed in Vietnam would have liked to have been in Vietnam in the first place. The film portrays a generation of young men who fought the war for a cause that they were not prepared to fight for. I think that many of the young men in this film probably would have preferred to have been in the military to start with, and many of them would probably have preferred to have been fighting in Vietnam. However, they were not ready for the horror of war, and the great sacrifice they were forced to make. They sacrificed their lives to make a great sacrifice for the sake of a cause that they did not believe in. It is sad that they were not given the respect that they deserved.

Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 06:50

The most compelling aspects of this documentary are the interviews of individuals who have participated in the Vietnam War and who experienced similar atrocities. Interviews were done with such individuals as Charles Manson, A.I.B.H., and Martin Ritter. The documentary includes discussions of the manner in which the U.S. military employed the tactics of war, which in turn are called "The Vietnam War". I was particularly interested in this aspect of the film because I saw the film "The Thin Red Line" in which the U.S. military did similar tactics during the Vietnam War. In the film, the U.S. military uses the same tactics as were used during the Vietnam War. In addition, the military uses the same tactics as are used during the Civil War. In my opinion, it is important to know that the same tactics were used during the Vietnam War as were used during the Civil War. I believe that this documentary is an important documentary to see because it shows the brutality that was committed by both the U.S. military and by the Vietnamese. It also shows that the U.S. military was more brutal and more ruthless than the Vietnamese military.

Wednesday, 01 Apr 2020 15:41

I can't say that I am a fan of the First World War. I've only seen it once and that was in my childhood and I've always thought it was a terrible war, but that's only because of the horrible war films I've seen. But I saw "The Great War" and I realized that this is the war that I was missing. I'm a pacifist and I don't think that war is always bad. The movie shows the real horror of war and the terrible atrocities that were committed. The only reason that I can understand why this movie got such a low rating is because of the bad taste it has. The movie has a good message and it's nice to see a movie about the war that isn't only about the fighting. If you're a pacifist and you want to see a movie about the war, see "The Great War".

Tuesday, 31 Mar 2020 17:04

The Israeli soldiers, as well as the Palestinians, were often depicted as the good guys. There were many scenes where soldiers were seen as the hero, the poor victim. I found it disturbing and a bit of a "war-movie" at times. The story was very interesting, but the movie itself wasn't very well made. The way the soldiers spoke to each other and the way they talked about their problems was very interesting, but I don't think they really talked about them. There was no real point to this film, it was just a bunch of interviews of soldiers and a lot of pictures of Israeli soldiers. It didn't have much to say about the conflict, or the conflict in general. It was just a bunch of interviews, and I'm sure you'll find many more interesting and different interviews on Youtube.

Monday, 30 Mar 2020 17:02

I have been waiting for this documentary for a long time. It was a long time since I had a chance to see it. It was a very powerful and powerful film. I think that the only thing that I didn't like about it was the music. I didn't like the music that much. I think it was a very good documentary and I recommend it to anyone who wants to learn more about the Holocaust. I think that this film was very well done and I think that the film makers did a very good job.

Sunday, 29 Mar 2020 12:23

I have always been a strong supporter of the anti-war movement, and that makes me a bit biased in this movie. But the overall message of the movie is, in my opinion, a very important one. I have seen many war documentaries, and none of them have conveyed a message like this one. War is just another destructive force in human life. To be totally honest, I found the movie to be rather simplistic. It does not give much information about the motivations of the people, the political views of the people, or what motivates them. In fact, it seems that this is all a little too general. This is not a very well thought out film. And it is hard to tell if this is a deliberate strategy on the part of the director or if it is just a by-product of the director's inexperience. I think it is the latter. The director does not seem to be very knowledgeable about the history of the Middle East and it is not clear why the director was so adamant that the American involvement in Iraq was justified. This movie is very pro-American and does not fully tell its audience why the US is there in the first place. If it did, then it would have told more of a reason why the US is there, and it would have given a little more insight into why the US has intervened in the Middle East in the first place. If the director had been more knowledgeable about the reasons for the American involvement in Iraq, then the movie would have given a more complete picture of why it is a necessary evil to intervene in the Middle East. However, the director just gave a pretty general statement and did not provide enough detail. This is a minor issue, and the movie is still very good. The other main issue is that this is a movie made for a very small audience. I personally thought that the director was very close to the right audience. And that is because the director has never had an opportunity to educate himself about the history of the Middle East. It would be very difficult for him to get the facts correct. He probably would not be able to get the context correct either. Therefore, he is likely to get the general feeling of what the viewer feels. That is a pretty poor technique. There are many inaccuracies in this movie, but I will not comment on them. I will comment on the message it tries to send. It sends that message because the director is trying to convince the viewer that the US involvement in Iraq is not justifiable, but it is wrong. I do not think that it is true that this is a universal message. The director obviously knows that the viewer is not going to be able to get all of the facts. He is trying to get the viewer to feel as if the US involvement in Iraq is wrong, so he is going to try to convince the viewer that it is wrong. However, he fails. And that is not the case of many movies. I would give this movie a 7/10, but I would like to make it a 9/10. If the director had not given the message that the US intervention in Iraq is wrong, then the movie would have been a much better movie. This movie is not good, but it is still a good movie. I think the director did a good job in giving the message, but it was not good enough to convince me that the US intervention in Iraq is not justifiable. I think it would have been more effective if the director had given a more complete and well thought out message. I think the message was not very clear, and it is not clear to me that the message was well received. But it is not clear to me that the message was completely misunderstood. I think that the director is very close to the right audience, and the message was given the best way that he could. I think that this movie will be very popular, and that the director will probably make another movie with the same theme. I do not think that the director was good at the job, but I do think that the director is probably going to do better movies in the future. I hope he does. 7/10

Friday, 27 Mar 2020 21:17

This film will be a surprise to many, as it is very controversial. I know a lot of people have either strongly opposed it or strongly defended it. But for me, this film was a very good attempt to tell the story of the victims of the holocaust. The film goes into the life of a Hungarian Jew who is working for a company that helps to rebuild the country after WWII. The director has made a good attempt to give the audience the facts of the holocaust without any moralizing or bashing the Nazi regime. The film is very well made and is very difficult to watch. The director uses long long shots that have very few cuts and the camera lingers on the faces of the people. The director goes into the heart of the people and shows how the people were treated, the persecution, the humiliation and the persecution. This film is really good and worth watching.

Friday, 27 Mar 2020 06:09

The movie follows a group of American soldiers in Iraq and they all share a common story. They are all Marines, and they have seen the horrors of war. However, this war has left them with no respect for the people they are killing. They feel that their fellow countrymen are being treated worse than they are. As a result, they feel they are the only ones who care about the people they are killing. This movie is very compelling, and is a must see. It is a powerful film that shows the real horrors of war and the atrocities that occur in this war. The movie is about the events that took place in Fallujah, and the deaths of hundreds of civilians. The movie also focuses on the American soldiers who have come home, and how they are still dealing with the war. The movie is very powerful, and you will see the real horrors of war. I recommend this film to anyone who has ever been in a war.

Thursday, 26 Mar 2020 21:15

As one of the world's largest producers and sellers of wood and wood products, it's a curious fact that the United States, like Europe, is not a good place for independent movie-makers and filmmakers. The producers and producers' committees of the Hollywood studios have an interest in keeping the movies as faithful as possible to the plot and to the story, without any deviation whatsoever. They may even go as far as to make sure that the scenes in which American soldiers are killed are really, for the most part, real. They are then rewarded with Oscar nominations and further lucrative careers in the business. When this film "As One" was released in the United States, it was quickly attacked by the 'think-tank' and 'think-tank' journalists, and the media outlets that they like to call 'independent'. In response, I became a member of the movie-making fraternity, and I attended the screening in New York City. In this film, I am pleased to say that it is much more the case that the producers and the movie-makers are independent filmmakers. The producers were mainly 'independent', but that is not to say that they were in any way 'unindependents' from any other group of filmmakers, or producers. They were only in the business of making movies, and they do not hesitate to talk about the hardships they went through in order to do this. In fact, I found that they were as courageous as any of the other independent filmmakers I have known. To be able to make a movie is one of the most difficult things any one can do. You have to take risks and make mistakes. I think this film was very well done, and I am very happy that it was shown in New York City, where the main audience would be. I have no doubt that the film will find its way to the theaters in other countries. But I do believe that in America, this film will not be the usual kind of commercial product that Hollywood has given us. It will be a 'good' film, and I am sure that it will not be accepted by the 'think-tank' and 'think-tank' media that are so in thrall to Hollywood. If that is the case, I hope that the film will be shown in more places than just New York City. 7/10

Thursday, 26 Mar 2020 06:06

I have seen this film a few times and I have to say it is a very good film. It is not for the squeamish, but if you can stomach a little bit of blood and gore, this is a great film to watch. I am a Christian and I have been reading about the atrocities of the Nazi regime and it is very interesting. There is a lot of historical facts that are not easily available to the public, so the film maker has to make up some of the history, which is a difficult task. The film is very well made, the music is very well done, and the actors are very good. This is a very well done film that is very well worth watching. I would recommend this film to anyone who is interested in the atrocities of the Nazis.

Friday, 20 Mar 2020 14:18

The events of the early 20th century in Nazi Germany are explored by the filmmakers, and their interpretation of these events is fascinating and unexpected. Much of the focus is on Werner and his relationship with his family, but the focus is also on his response to the atrocities perpetrated by the Nazis, and his long lasting impact on his community. There are several moments of comedy in the film, as Werner reflects on how much he still cares about his community. One of the many highlight scenes is when Werner goes on an adventure and encounters the local farmers. The subplots of Werner's experience in the countryside are very interesting, and the film is very interesting in its own right. It is also interesting to see how a Nazi documentary has become an important cultural document, both in Germany and around the world.

Friday, 20 Mar 2020 09:10

The last few months have been dominated by the event of the Iraq War. This film is a critical look at the impact the war has had on the United States and the countries in which it has been fought. The film focuses on three Americans - a colonel, a general and a congresswoman - who have been fighting the war. They speak about the war in an emotional way, but they also speak of their personal feelings towards it. One of the more interesting subjects of the film is that of their families, particularly their wives. The film is a great personal account of the three men's wives and their feelings towards their husbands and their careers. The film does an excellent job of showing their different ways of life, both in the United States and abroad. The film is clearly very moving and important to show the emotional connection the three men's wives have with their husbands. The film is an excellent documentary about a very important and emotionally charged subject. It is also very informative, with many good interviews and a very interesting timeline of events. The film is a good introduction to the war and the war in general, and is definitely a must see.

Friday, 20 Mar 2020 04:49

This documentary about the WW2 concentration camps is very well done and contains a lot of good information about the camps. It is quite depressing at times, but the documentary makes you feel sorry for the people that were in the camps. It is a very difficult subject to deal with, and the film is quite informative. The film is not overly violent and the movie does not glorify the Nazi regime. The film is very disturbing and the tone of the film is very somber. It is not a film for the faint of heart, but it is a very important film that should be seen.

Lawrence Martinez

Friday, 20 Mar 2020 04:09

I went to the premiere of this movie at the Austin Film Festival. I had heard about it and it sounded interesting. I am a huge fan of director Richard Linklater. His earlier films (e.g., Waking Life) were thought provoking and highly entertaining. But I have never seen anything like Boyhood. This film is not for the faint of heart. There are many scenes that are difficult to watch. The film makers do a great job of breaking down the script and showing the real-life life of the characters. This is a great film and I am glad to have seen it. I also have a feeling that it will be a huge hit. I will be seeing it again at the theater. The movie is also nominated for Best Picture. I hope it wins. The film makers are very thoughtful and have done a wonderful job of showing the life of the family and their journey. I highly recommend this film. It is very important that people see this film.

Friday, 20 Mar 2020 01:11

This is a very powerful film that makes you think about what we are doing to our planet. The film is well worth watching. It is not a documentary and does not attempt to explain anything. It simply shows the extent to which people are willing to sacrifice themselves for their beliefs. I was moved to tears several times during the film. It is an amazing film and is well worth watching. It is worth noting that this film was funded by a group of people who believe that the planet is in dire need of saving. They believe that we are destroying the planet and that our planet has been destroyed. This film shows that these beliefs are very dangerous and that we are destroying the planet. The people who funded this film believe that the world is in danger of being destroyed. If you are one of those people, this film is a must watch.

Thursday, 19 Mar 2020 23:53

The movie was not at all boring. The only reason that I did not give it an 8, is because of the fact that it did not have a good, but well done music score. It was also quite slow. There were also some parts where I was just waiting for the movie to end. However, the fact that it was based on a true story made it a good movie. I think that it was a great movie for those who are interested in the war in Iraq. It was a good movie that you could watch over and over again.

Thursday, 19 Mar 2020 21:43

As an American living in the UK, I have seen the "war on terror" rhetoric a lot, and so I was interested in this documentary. However, I was surprised to see the movie in its entirety, not just as an overview of the film, but as a "what if" film. This film was a bit too long, and I felt the story was a bit too "closed". However, I am glad I watched it, and that I was able to learn about the issue in a non-biased manner. I would highly recommend this film, as it is definitely worth your time. I am a bit biased, but that doesn't mean that I was not able to understand what the filmmakers were trying to say. Also, it was nice to see a few British voices, especially the American ones. Overall, I would recommend this film, as it is an important film, and it is definitely worth your time. I would definitely recommend it.

See all 22 reviews

Write a review