x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Mr. Chibbs

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(214) 7.1 86 min 2017

Mr. Chibbs is a movie starring Kenny Anderson, Natasha Anderson, and Nate Archibald. "Mr. Chibbs" is an observational feature length documentary that follows NBA All-Star Kenny Anderson, in the midst of a mid life crisis, dealing...

Starring: Natasha Anderson, Nate Archibald, Kenny Anderson, Tiki Barber

Genres: Documentary

Director: Jill Campbell

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Documentary
Director	Jill Campbell
Writer	Jill Campbell
Stars	Natasha Anderson, Nate Archibald, Kenny Anderson, Tiki Barber
Country	USA
Runtime	1H 26M
Description	This observational documentary follows NYC basketball prodigy and retired NBA All-Star Kenny Anderson in the midst a mid-life crisis and on a journey to find himself. Reeling from his mother's death and a subsequent DUI, "Chibbs" visits people and arenas from his past, confronting haunting memories of alcoholism and abuse, ultimately finding solace in becoming the father he never had time to be. Combining unseen archival footage with raw moments of reflection, "Mr. Chibbs" explores what an athlete goes through once their talent fades and they are forced to face who they will be for the rest of their lives.

Download documentary «Mr. Chibbs»

Blu-ray
13.39 GB

Windows
5.09 GB

Customers who watched «Mr. Chibbs» also watched

15 customer reviews about «Mr. Chibbs»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Tuesday, 30 Jun 2020 23:45

A typical 'B' grade feature, this one was cut to death and has disappeared into the ether. Despite being filmed during one of the bleakest times in decades, the film's post-production crew manages to squeeze in some of the most mundane screen time imaginable. (Somehow, they managed to shove in less than 30 seconds of any of the talking during the entire production). It seems that the person who actually brought this movie to life was just too embarrassed to admit to any of the gross mistakes, which makes for an entertaining and at times poignant viewing experience. The director manages to depict the people involved with the film and shows them to be very real and tough people, which is quite appropriate given the entire scenario they were being portrayed as. However, I personally don't feel that there is enough substance in this documentary to make this film a worthwhile experience.

Sunday, 21 Jun 2020 19:53

This is the first film from director Paul Thomas Anderson and I have to say it's a good one. The two lead actors - Thomas Mann and Brad Pitt - are both excellent. Anderson gives you the feel of a film that isn't made for him, and thus he should use more of them. This is a very emotional film, if you look past the tone of it. This is a documentary, and one that will resonate with anyone with a passion for film. And Pitt plays it well. I just wish Anderson had another film of his that he was so good at making.

Wednesday, 17 Jun 2020 15:44

The second installment of the drama "The Turner Diaries" is a mere excuse to see the "top of the barrel" here. The picture stars everyone's favorite masked avenger, Christopher Walken as an infamous gangster, The Turner, who is serving life in prison. He decides to get the lowdown on all the pimping and rape (among other things) he does in prison. The complete lack of being able to say that he has done anything wrong seems to serve as an excellent artistic statement. The guy is so hell bent on being moral that he ignores the moral question posed to him. He does not know any better, and all he cares about is making money for his personal drug dealing group. He just wants to make a buck for the others who were once close to him. But hey, what's new.you do know, it's not always a bad thing to do that, right? So, he does all this pimping and raping, and suddenly you feel sympathy for the guy, and the reality of his situation seems to put in a new light. Then again, maybe it wasn't meant to. What I really wanted to know is what was the point of the documentary. It could have been a very interesting documentary, but all we get is what is on screen. Walken is certainly better here than in "The Phantom of the Opera" as well as "All the president's Men" (I thought that was the only documentary I've ever seen that was better, though). Walken seems to be enjoying this role, and apparently the "phantom" was more fun to watch in "Chinatown" (he was the phantoms under the street lights). It's one thing to pretend to be moral while being "bad" all the time, but in a documentary about a criminal and his story, to show him as a hypocrite would have been more interesting, especially since the subject matter would have helped to depict that character better. There is a scene where he sees the hole in his pants that he had done all that pimping and raping, and he says something like, "I see what I did was wrong." I think there should have been a bit more insight into that character as well, because he has certainly done a lot of things right in his life, and it seemed like there were more things that the guy should have explained. So, maybe I'm being harsh. The film is good, and I did enjoy the documentary aspect, but the picture feels very

Friday, 12 Jun 2020 04:16

This is a documentary about Michael Jackson and his music. While it is a somewhat boring documentary, it does show how great and influential his music was, and also how hard it was for him to do and sell. The acting is great, and I didn't really get bored, but the pace was a bit slow, and a bit long, but it was all good. This is a definite must see!

Wednesday, 03 Jun 2020 06:20

I had seen this film at a special screening with a half dozen of my friends at the Seattle Film Festival. I was impressed. It's an excellent film. I've only read the book but after seeing the movie I really got the feeling that I had already read the book. If you've read the book it's a lot better. I also read the film's commentary by the writer, director and actor that was quite interesting. I would have to say that for the viewer who hasn't read the book, I recommend that you read the film first and then go into the film hoping that you get a good feeling of what the book is like. Having said that, I did enjoy the film for what it was. It was entertaining but there was definitely a lot more to it than just entertainment.

Monday, 01 Jun 2020 16:57

I recently watched this film, which has a rating of 6.6, and in my mind it's one of the best documentaries I've ever seen. It has very little dialogue and in fact the way its filmed is very convincing. Not only that but the cinematography is quite amazing, and they keep the tempo quite low, which means it's very easy to follow. However, I didn't enjoy it all that much. The story is really hard to follow, with only a few lines being spoken, and the characters that appear are non-existent, meaning that you don't really get a chance to connect with them. The beginning isn't really that interesting either, and after a few scenes the viewer is left wondering why they bothered. I can't say anything more about the film, but it has to be said that it's worth a watch, for the purpose of discovering the best documentaries. Also, I think it's very important for documentary makers to have the freedom to do what they want, and that's what makes them great. I recommend it to anyone who has an interest in documentary films, because it's an exceptional film.

Sunday, 24 May 2020 08:47

I'm not sure how this film was received by the mainstream, but it's certainly not mainstream for the reasons I'm about to explain. I'm a big fan of Mick Garris, but I just don't care for the lyrics to his songs. I find them to be tasteless and completely over-the-top and have absolutely no appreciation for them. So much so that it really takes some concentration to watch his interviews, but it's one thing to make fun of a celebrity (but not in the way of being mean), but another to not only do so, but to seem like a drunk. "Bizarre" seems to be a word of judgement rather than a description of the film. People might think it's rude, but I don't agree. A little bit of unhinged personality does not equal a mean person, and we must consider the context of the interview. There is a reason why it's usually in the same room as the singer or the guy on stage. And this is such a small part of the movie that if you really think about it, it's much funnier than "Muscle Shoals" or "Whiplash." For those who haven't seen these films, this documentary really isn't for you. It's a review, and it's a very, very serious one. You really have to be extremely tolerant of people who don't appreciate your culture, or even just to think that anyone who does should consider themselves in a different category. It's an annoying habit that can be very annoying if you're not prepared for it, but there are no apologies, because it's actually fun. If you like "Young Jesus" or "I Am Nothing" this is definitely worth checking out, but for the rest of us, watch it and see how the story is told.

Saturday, 16 May 2020 12:21

In some ways, I think this is one of the most depressing films ever made. The performances are all really bad and some of the people are so obnoxious you really want to jump on them and physically punch them in the face. The message here is the most unimportant part of the film and doesn't deserve much attention. The execution of the documentary is about as poor as it gets, the camera angles are very choppy and the music is terrible. The editing is abysmal. There are no characters, there are no actors and it seems like a collection of random clips. It also feels like the writers and director were never together. There are a few moments of decent footage, but I would have much preferred this film if it had been edited a bit better and had fewer scenes.

Friday, 15 May 2020 10:51

Filmmaker Derek Richards's new film is a simple, yet effective tour de force. Understated, yet stylish. The film takes us back to the days when Jimmie Stewart was one of the most versatile stars of the old days, and we see his beginning in a forgotten small town in Georgia, a young boy, and his family's changing history as the young boy, with his father's help, is made to take part in an underground race to the moon, as we learn about the rich history of this long forgotten race. We also see the beginning of a career for Jimmie as an actor, as we see him as a young man, at the peak of his acting potential, in a well known TV movie, and as we see his ambitions in the new era of Hollywood. The film gives us insight into the creation of the famous Hollywood movies of the era, and the early years of the film industry. The film is very well made, as it is a visual documentary, much like the best of David Lynch, but with a lot of beautiful and subtle humor, and without being crude or overly offensive. A must see for all Jimmie fanatics!

Wednesday, 13 May 2020 21:27

I am a HUGE fan of Steve Martin and Tom Cruise and I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. "Charmed" is a fun, silly comedy that definitely needs to be seen. It was a typical movie from that era in which a spy film went down to the wire and all they were trying to do was make a movie and what do you get? "Charmed" does have a definite comedic edge to it, but not a mainstream, Hollywood comedy. This movie has tons of funny lines and Tom Cruise is a great actor in my opinion, but I don't believe that this movie is making him rich. It is definitely a must see for any Tom Cruise fan and a great movie for all.

Friday, 24 Apr 2020 21:02

Chris Cornell died on a cold winter night in late February, and he will never be fully able to enjoy what he would consider his greatest work. We are taught from the time we are young to believe in what we read, hear or see. Chris had it all. He was a brilliant singer, but also an excellent storyteller. He had no need to write any music. He had more of an ability to generate emotions and sing them out loud than many a singer. He had the ability to inspire people and would do so in ways that I'll never be able to replicate. He was also a great conversationalist. We know the story of his life by now, but this documentary is my attempt to attempt to tell it to others. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did. Thank you, Robin

Friday, 24 Apr 2020 18:37

Rekindleed -- One Man's War Against The Church Of Scientology. This is a film from the perspective of the viewer. I've never been a fan of John Travolta and his role in this movie. I think the plot of the movie is pretty silly. I'm sorry, but John Travolta wasn't that bad. I don't care if he killed someone or kicked their teeth out, but it was just funny when he was doing it. In the movie, I think the worst part of the movie was when, in the beginning, he talks about how he is a fanatic and not much else. He says that the Church of Scientology tried to kill his son and that they told him to "Shut your head off" when he did a little bit of harm. The movie, as I mentioned before, is just ridiculous. They spent a lot of money to put this on the big screen and they wanted to make it entertaining. I think they did a pretty good job of it.

Friday, 24 Apr 2020 18:01

I agree with most of the comments here, Mr. Chibbs is a talented and well known comedian. However, I found him to be an annoying person, and not funny at all. The jokes were never funny. He acted as though he could barely stand, and was unable to turn down a client. I like to have fun, but I also have to know that a joke is funny. I didn't laugh once.

Friday, 24 Apr 2020 17:46

Perhaps in the mid-1960's, or the mid-1970's, before the influence of the TV show Alias, they were simply being sent off to prison in Texas. But the first, and the only, female convict to be portrayed on screen was Roberta Gregory (in 1974, she had a minor role in the TV show The Twelve Chairs), in 1985's The Last House on the Left, and she certainly had a small, but important role in The Trial of the Century, which I discovered recently on video. Her performance in this film (which was written and directed by a woman) is superb. I feel somewhat ashamed that the director, Shari Springer-Young, is a man, as he has obviously not had much experience in the field of women's film-making. One feels that there are some gaps in his history as an actress. If I may refer the readers to another similar film, Mamie Van Doren's New Jack City, which premiered on TV in 1968, which was based on a short story by the same name. It was directed by Elmer Bernstein, who has a reputation for very successful films with women, and it seems that he has made a career as a director, but then again, in what way? I would have liked to have seen his performance, but perhaps he will be up for a different kind of award someday, perhaps a Lifetime Achievement Award. I would also have liked to have seen his performance in any of the women's movies that he has made. Because of his lack of experience, this movie, about a woman who is sent to prison after a conviction for killing her boyfriend, comes off more like a documentary than a movie. For the most part, it is very disjointed, and seems to go from one story to another, with no real resolution, and a lot of empty space between each story. One story includes a prison-reform activist, the mother of a young girl who was raped by a guard and then sentenced to a "drunken girl" program, as if the director needed to get some background information. Another story involves a lesbian couple who escaped prison, and found refuge in a small town. They eventually return to prison, and when they are released, they have changed their name from a derogatory name to a better one. The director has done a service for women who were arrested, but were not convicted of a crime, by showing their plight. In the last two stories, there is a good deal of commentary, but at the end

Justin Richardson

Friday, 24 Apr 2020 15:01

This is a great little film about the trail of the infamous John Chibbs, an American motorcycle gang leader, who terrorized and murdered the American Jewish community during the 1940's and '50's. Chibbs was a serial killer who moved his gang members and associates from place to place, and he had a knack for committing a number of different types of crimes. In Los Angeles, he used the Jewish community's extensive lists of mobsters, to find out where his enemies were living. But, it was also during this period in the country, that the United States became the nation of laws, as did Germany and Britain. The only difference is that in the United States, someone is eventually brought to justice, because that is what the legal system does. On the other hand, Germany and England, were doing things that were totally different. Germany's laws were strict and very thorough. England's laws were more open and even more tolerant. Another difference was that in Germany and England, it was illegal to look for somebody who might be "in hiding". You could go to prison for that, but in America, you could look for somebody who was hiding, but you could not. The same goes for France, which had very different laws than the United States. The difference was that the French system was somewhat less lenient than the American system. The film's running time of four and a half hours is a little too long, and I found it a little boring. That is, until I learned about the killers of John Chibbs. The criminals who committed the murders were executed, or put to death, in different ways. In America, we kept a great deal of information about the crime committed by Chibbs, until the assassination of the actor John Wayne, but we did not keep any information about the rest of the gang. This would have been a very interesting subject, if the film was not being told from the point of view of Chibbs. The film is not just about his career in gangsterism. It's also about his adventures in a variety of other subjects. I liked this film very much, but it is probably not one I would recommend to my friends. My vote for The Big Noise is seven. Title (Brazil): "O Buen Problim" ("The Beast of Fear")

See all 15 reviews

Write a review