x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Pájaros de verano

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(8697) 7.5 125 min 2018

Pájaros de verano is a movie starring Carmiña Martínez, José Acosta, and Natalia Reyes. During the marijuana bonanza, a violent decade that saw the origins of drug trafficking in Colombia, Rapayet and his indigenous family get...

Starring: Natalia Reyes, Jhon Narváez, Carmiña Martínez, José Acosta

Genres: Crime, Drama

Director: Ciro Guerra, Cristina Gallego

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Crime, Drama
Director	Ciro Guerra, Cristina Gallego
Writer	Maria Camila Arias, Ciro Guerra, Jacques Toulemonde Vidal, Cristina Gallego
Stars	Natalia Reyes, Jhon Narváez, Carmiña Martínez, José Acosta
Country	France, Germany, Switzerland, Colombia, Mexico, Denmark
Also Known As	Trækfugle, Az átkelés madarai, Les oiseaux de passage, Ptice selice, Sny wędrownych ptaków, Vasaros pauksciai, 夏の鳥, Birds of Passage, Oro verde - C'era una volta in Colombia, Birds of Passage - Das grüne Gold der Wayuu, Göç Mevsimi, Pássaros de Verão, Αποδημητικά πουλιά, Păsări călătoare
Runtime	2H 5M
Description	During the marijuana bonanza, a violent decade that saw the origins of drug trafficking in Colombia, Rapayet and his indigenous family get involved in a war to control the business that ends up destroying their lives and their culture.

Download crime «Pájaros de verano»

Blu-ray
13.78 GB

Windows
5.48 GB

Customers who watched «Pájaros de verano» also watched

23 customer reviews about drama «Pájaros de verano»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Saturday, 18 Jul 2020 07:51

Tom Hanks is back with his best film yet. Bringing the silent movie legend of John Ford to life in this adaptation of his classic western. The film revolves around a travelling stagecoach team who find themselves on a journey to the west for revenge and redemption. Hanks portrays Charles Howard, the charismatic, arrogant, selfish and obsessive stagecoach driver, who becomes the focus of the film. Carroll O'Connor is the cast's biggest asset as the film's central antagonist, playing with the same megalomaniacal demeanor of John Wayne. Tom Berenger and Jennifer Jason Leigh are the supporting actors who work their way into the narrative. Hanks is back in his directorial debut and it is no surprise that he was a surprise hit with the Academy. He does a good job taking the story into new territories and expanding on the western's famous elements. The film is not a western; it is a western that uses its influences. I would say that the film's best sequence is its third act, as the shootouts and time travel make you feel like you are actually there. I know that there are some who are going to dismiss the film as an action film but its not. The majority of the film is quite tense and quite violent, which is fitting for an action film. There are a few things that might bother those who are not familiar with the western but there is plenty of action, chase scenes, and gun fights. The film's best sequences are the second act, third act and the climax. I also would say that the best thing about this film is the fact that it never takes itself too seriously. Sure, its some film-making, but it doesn't take itself too seriously. It is a western for the 21st century and that is what it should be. That being said, it is not a perfect western and the film does not cover everything the original had to offer. The film does however cover the elements that the first film had: the western legend and the moral about the sixties.

Tuesday, 07 Jul 2020 08:47

If the movie were a novella it would be more interesting than the novel, that is why I have given it a 7. In the end, it is not clear how much of the story is true, and to be honest, I would have liked to see the movie without a lot of cuts and dialogue and with more time devoted to the story. It seems to me that the director and the actor should have made a movie without the script, instead of a story of battles, bombings, and violence. What we are given here are some little things, without being enough to make the movie real. So, for the rest, it is a good movie.

Monday, 06 Jul 2020 13:13

This is a documentary with an interesting subject, and most of the actors are known to me. It is a little bit slow, because there are scenes that appear to be mainly edited. The last 40 minutes could have been edited, so that the scene of Xala (Lopez) and the kidnappers with Xala's husband could have been gone. The ending would have been better, that is, if it was not about Xala (Lopez), but about Xala's husband. My vote is seven. Title (Brazil): "Dos Zona Novo: O Escolha" ("The Road Underfoot: The Three-Car Chase")

Wednesday, 01 Jul 2020 07:34

I read the movie earlier today and I have to say that it is the most beautiful film I've ever seen. The cinematography is absolutely wonderful and adds to the atmosphere of the film. The story is about a singer who doesn't know why she is being played by her brother and decides to go to England to find out why. It was done beautifully in the first half of the movie. The story, however, was lost during the second half. The middle of the movie is told in flashback, and a lot of the second half is told in flashback. The flashback scenes are very well done and bring out the atmosphere in the movie. I think the editing of the second half of the movie was not good and hurt the overall feel of the movie. The movie is a little too long. A lot of scenes are repeated over and over again. I think they could have cut a few scenes that were unnecessary to the story. The acting is excellent. I especially liked the actors that played the son and the brother. The music was also very good. The movies is worth seeing if you like the music of Nino Rota or especially Toto. I know a lot of people don't like Nino Rota or Toto, but I think they are both excellent artists.

Monday, 29 Jun 2020 12:22

An enigmatic woman (Maria Cristina Yang) marries a man (Gustavo Monteleone) who is a drug mule. He wants to become a doctor and Maria wants to be his wife. She loses her job and he is deported to his village where he's forced to live in abject poverty. When she finally finds work she has to work long hours. She witnesses what the drug traffickers in her village do to the male population, that's why she wants to escape. She can't escape in a village where the men do the physical labor and she has to do the intellectual work as well. She is not a virgin but she is underdeveloped physically. She has to be much younger. I've seen it now but it has a lot to live up to. It's very well made and is a very original movie that's not pretentious. It's a violent movie but it's also very tragic. There are no easy solutions. It is very sad but a wonderful movie. It's a bit disturbing but very entertaining. It's a very well made movie that's different from anything else.

Saturday, 27 Jun 2020 03:25

Let me start by saying that I have never written a review for a movie before. I'm a Spanish/European movies-lovers, and usually, the people who are critical of them are either naive or naive about Spanish/European movies. Well, these two groups, I'm in the latter group. So I'm going to give my view on the film, and my prediction is that it will be a good one, at least a good one. The story is essentially the same as the novel 'The Fade Away', written by the young poet Luis Garcia-Rulfo, which was published in 1988, and also starred Jose Luis Zamora (he is also known for being part of the soundtrack of the film), and Roberto Schindler. Zamora's story, to be frank, is not that great. He is a drug dealer, and his life becomes a hell in his family, and also in his life, as he has been selected for a job that will destroy him. The film was made in 1987 and has the same music from Schindler's earlier film 'Last Stand' (the movie was written by Schindler and James Buell, and he also wrote the music for the film). But it does have a few important things. First of all, Schindler is a very good director. I haven't seen any movie of his before that has really scared me, and I can safely say that this movie scared me very much. The screenplay is also very good, and has some very good dialogue, one of my favorite parts being the one in which Zamora asks to his father what he thinks about drugs, and his father replies "I think it's an ugly drug". This is very disturbing, and one of the scenes that really makes you cry. The performances are also good, especially that of Schindler. He is the main character of the story, and he does a great job. The cinematography is also excellent, and has some of the best scenes of the film, and is also among the best scenes in the whole movie. I give it a 7/10.

Friday, 26 Jun 2020 15:40

The question I ask myself when I watch a movie, is this the most intelligent movie I've ever seen? If so, it's because I understand something. I like watching movies that have nothing to say about society, but have people doing things that make me want to change the world. This movie is one of those. The thing is, there's not much going on in this movie, but it does what it set out to do. It asks a question, and shows you something that I can't explain in words, but that makes you think and that makes you laugh. It's a very good film. Great acting, great music, and great story. My only problem is I don't understand it. I know this movie was made to be intelligent, but I didn't find it, and I don't know why. If you have a problem with movies, you should try this one. The problem is I don't understand it.

Wednesday, 24 Jun 2020 12:39

I've read some very negative comments here. I liked this movie. First, I must point out that this movie is NOT a comedy, although I understand that it was intended to be a comedy. So, in some cases, the film isn't exactly a comedy. The movie has many plot lines. Some of them are very dark and some are funny, very dark. But, this movie is not about the plot. It's about the emotions and actions of the characters, and the feelings they suffer. If you do not understand what I mean by this, you probably have an uncomfortable mind. For example, when the soldier cries at the point of the family, I cried a little too. Maybe because I know my friend who has a wife and two kids. But I also cried at the scene when he kisses the doctor. Maybe because he knows that my friend has a wife and kids too. But also maybe because the situation is very different from our own. And when the doctor is taken away, I too cry because of the loss of this man's life. But, the most important thing is that this movie does not focus on one or two situations. There are many situations, many threads. I think this movie is very intense, but also funny. I also think that this is not a film for people who do not understand humor, people who don't understand love, or people who do not understand sadness. The most important thing for me is that I liked this movie. You should not judge it by its genre, it's an interesting movie with some very dark moments. But if you understand the depth of this film, you'll like it. The actors in the movie are very good, and the direction is excellent. In my opinion, the movie is good enough to be nominated for a Nobel prize.

Thursday, 18 Jun 2020 13:18

The opening of this movie is the best in the entire trilogy. It's very thought-provoking and emotionally moving. However, the movie does suffer from a very unsatisfying conclusion. When you find out the identity of the person you're watching, it's not exactly that satisfying. The end is just ridiculous. The movie is a great mixture of honesty, humor, drama, action, and music. It would be great to see a more powerful ending. The performances are amazing. Vinicius is the star of this movie, but I would say that Ray Lister and Billy Zane are also quite great. All the actors do their jobs well, especially Raymond J. Barry, but the ending is definitely not up to the level of the rest of the movie.

Wednesday, 17 Jun 2020 17:44

This film from a young director has all the ingredients for a really interesting and unforgettable movie. The acting, especially by Pedro Lagayos, makes it easy to forget that he's a teenager. The camera work is sharp and the sound design gives the impression of the time when Portugal had its fame as a cinema capital of the world. The soundtrack includes great songs from various eras, a simple production and, of course, fantastic sound effects, particularly the ones used for some of the scenes. The most interesting thing of all about this movie is that it is beautifully filmed, in particular in the scenes of Lisbon and Cape Town. This is a film with a quality and style that has won lots of awards, and one that I think should be a mandatory screening for students who love art and film.

Wednesday, 10 Jun 2020 22:50

Viggo Mortensen is fantastic as always. I liked it a lot. I do have a few complaints about the film though. It lacks a lot of emotion. I don't think there was enough emotion in the film. I could sense what was going on in the film, but I can't tell how, because I felt it was a little too stiff. It was also very black and white, so I really didn't like it. It's just the way the film was. You can't really see the life of the film as it is. I thought the first two acts were great, but they were slow, and slow is not a good thing to go for. I do like it, though, I really did. I like the film very much.

Wednesday, 10 Jun 2020 16:53

Samuel L. Jackson is a right-of-center actor, his cultural and ethnic influences are very limited, as is his acting ability. So when I say that this was a decent film, I do mean it. I don't mean the most sincere or sincere of films. I mean one of those films that, when you watch it, you'll say, "This is an OK film. I liked it." It isn't one of those that you watch and say, "This is really good." It's one of those films you watch and think, "This is really good." If you want to see Samuel L. Jackson on film, I highly recommend "Goodfellas."

Friday, 05 Jun 2020 17:10

I never thought I'd say this about a Chilean film but I felt compelled to share that I watched this movie recently. It's a film that deserves attention - it's really good and it's quite surprising that it didn't win any awards here in Spain. There's no story, it's a documentary, it's a drama and it's done very well - there are a lot of good things about this film. There's some horrific violence and sadism. It's an interesting film that tells a sad story about a strange young man that finds himself dealing with the life of a thief, he's not really sure why he's doing it. It's a very good movie about a remarkable man. In fact, it's a very good film and deserves a lot of attention. It's a real shame that this film is not available on DVD in Spain. The film is divided into three parts - the first is very sad, very sad and shows the extent of the life of a thief - it's very sad. The second part is about the life of a friend of the thief and the man - it's also sad, it's very sad. The third part is a bit violent, even in a tragic way but it's still very good. It's a wonderful film that I think deserves lots of attention. I've seen this movie several times and I still think it's good and worth seeing.

Monday, 01 Jun 2020 13:01

If you are into action movies, you will surely enjoy watching this movie. It has one of the best cast in the last years, especially Marco Beltrami. It has the atmosphere of an average high budget action movie. The movie shows a couple of different stories about different characters. Both couples have something in common, they are middle aged men who have fallen in love with each other. At the same time, they are dealing with problems of alcoholism and drug addiction. The movie does not only show the problems of these characters, but also the consequences of their problems. The main character in the movie is a middle aged man named Jose. He is suffering from alcoholism and drug addiction and is in a bad situation. He has been broke for years, but he does not want to go bankrupt. When he meets a woman named Sutter, he falls in love with her. Unfortunately, his love is not enough for him. The movie shows that it is not only alcohol or drugs that can ruin your life. However, the most interesting thing about the movie is the beautiful actress in the movie. Maria Braga is truly one of the most beautiful actresses of her time. She is convincing in her role as Jose. The only thing that might turn you off from watching this movie is the fact that it is a brazilian movie.

Saturday, 30 May 2020 23:46

The son of a post-revolutionary Hungarian officer arrives at his father's home. Two separate family members, his wife and father, are murdered by the leading anti-communist faction. It is now a question of who is responsible. Laila is a journalist whose husband was one of the two generals who were killed. After hearing of the assassination, she goes into exile in the United States. She decides to write a book on the matter. It is a particularly cruel day for her when she receives a call from her husband's killers. Laila knows that they are in Budapest and she decides to take a journey to Hungary in order to prove her husband's killers. The police and Hungarian government officers who are in the country don't have a clue what is going on, but they don't know how to react either. The play was written by another Hungarian writer, Ludmila Kotev, who is now also a director. For me, the problem of the play is that the wife of the killer, the woman who is most responsible for the crime, is portrayed as a foolish, self-obsessed woman. When she learns that her husband has died, she suddenly feels guilty. This woman is not a very good wife, she lacks good sense and she is always depressed. She even looks depressed and she is without humour. I can't imagine how she could justify the murder, even though her husband has died. The only woman to me who is at fault is Laila, who is a good wife and a kind-hearted person. She wants to help the police and the Hungarian government, but she is also a selfish woman. She wants to get a good life for her child and be part of the culture, but she is also selfish, jealous and not very confident. All these character flaws make the movie very hard to watch. The story is not very strong, but it is a very good movie. I didn't understand what the purpose of the play was, but it is a nice and entertaining movie. It has its flaws, but it is still an enjoyable movie and is recommended to anyone who likes this type of movies.

Friday, 29 May 2020 22:15

The movie reminded me of a film from the late seventies in which an old lady had been brutally murdered. Even though the murder was a reality that was witnessed by many people, the elderly woman lived on and on with all of the people in her life. This movie begins a little in the future with two criminals, Sid (Ondrej Malak, also of the older woman) and Jose (Jorge Jimenez, who is now an extremely cynical man who has destroyed his life with the theft of stolen jewelry). Jose's younger brother, Salvador (Jose Maria Almonte, also from the older woman's life) has seen the murder and becomes fascinated with Sid and Jose's story. It's their story, not the murder, that is to change Jose's life. Salvador has two major problems: he cannot believe that Jose and Jose are such good friends and he has the thought that Jose and Jose might have gotten into the debt he owes to a local businessman and, thus, committed robbery. But, as the movie develops, Jose's story is revealed and, after a while, Jose's is revealed too. Their story is one of the best in the movie, because, for the first time, we see how people are involved in crime, how they deal with the responsibility of their actions and how they have to suffer the consequences of their actions. It's a movie with two stories that is also about the human nature. One is about the older woman's murder, about the consequences of those who take what they want and want what they have. The other is about Jose's evolution and about the conflicts between Jose and Salvador. The movie is of the most dramatic nature. The scenes that you have seen before will not look the same any more. The movie is shot in the same way, but the stories are of a different genre. But, of course, it's the great Joaquim Rojo, who, more than the others, takes care of the cast. The thing that makes this movie so important is that we see the different paths taken by the characters. The movie is not so much about the criminals, but about the characters of both the criminal and the victim. As far as we can see, both the criminals and the victims are human beings. A man who robbed from a local bank and the elderly woman who lived with the criminals and never received a cent. Some people may not like this movie and may even say that the portrayal of Jose is too stereotyped. But, I believe that the movie does more for the criminals than the victims. It's the criminals who are the victims and vice versa. I think that the movie is worth seeing, because it shows that there are things that people will do and they don't seem to be happy with what they have done. But, what really makes the movie interesting is how much of a character Jose is, and the love that Jose has for the elderly woman. "El tequila de verano" tells the story of Jose and his love for the elderly woman. After they have killed her, Jose doesn't seem to feel like anything has happened to him at all. He's always been just a simple man, a private individual, with a good job and a good life, a person who didn't want to hurt anybody. Now, as he looks back on all that has happened and realizes that everything has happened for a reason, he feels nothing at all. It's a very well told story about the value of human life and the pain it must have for people to do so many terrible things. I give this movie a 7 out of 10. I recommend it to anyone who is interested in crime movies.

Saturday, 23 May 2020 03:20

There are two stories that center on Mexico's drug wars. The first, "El maranon," tells the story of a hoodlum who becomes a big player in the drug trade. The second story, "El piso" tells the story of a young boy, Raoul, who joins the local drug cartel and is the son of one of the bosses. Neither of the stories are as well-written as the first, but both are good and important. The first part of "El maranon" is focused on Raoul, who grows up in poverty and hustles his way into the drug trade. His family suffers from gang violence and the poverty is the reason he joins the drug cartel. This part of the story is easy to understand and there is much humor to go with it. His story is also part of the drug cartel and the drug problem is a part of it, too. However, his story and that of the small boy also goes on for much longer than it should. It is often hard to find people who could relate to Raoul's life, because they did not have the same circumstances. As a result, the stories often feel forced and not as natural. The second part of "El piso" is focused on Raoul's son. The film is also very realistic, and with the help of Elmarra, one of the best directors working today, it is filled with excellent action. One of the most amazing scenes is the execution of one of the bosses. The action in this part of the film is much more intense than the first. Raoul's son has a larger role than in the first part and his death is intense and painful. The story is long, but it is full of action and much of the acting is excellent. The film is far from perfect, but is still an important work of art.

Kenneth Stephens

Friday, 22 May 2020 21:24

The long overdue film about a man in the 1960's who has gone down a path to lawlessness and violence. The film, in a small, well-appointed, black and white, is edited in a way that more than makes up for its negative aspects. The writing, by both Peruvian writers, including three Pedro Pizarro's, focuses on a range of subjects, including how the law is treated, how the drug lords and petty criminals are dealt with, how people react when people are killed, how events can become an entire revolution, and how large families survive. The films is mostly true, but it seems to go in a rather unpolished, believable and believable way. The film follows the life of a young man in the 1960's, Tixilauro de la Vega, who may or may not be able to protect his family, but he sees violence, disorder and violence as the way of life, and he is unable to help the situations around him. It is a short film, not much time is spent on action, and it focuses on the life of a young man, Tixilauro. The film works well as a drama, and it is the central character in a much longer film, The Stand. Still, this film is a lot better than the Stand, and if you enjoyed that, you will definitely enjoy this one. If you liked the Stand, and want a good, calm drama, this film will not disappoint.

Tuesday, 12 May 2020 04:16

I just recently saw this movie, and for the most part I think it was an enjoyable and enjoyable time. I enjoyed the story, and there were some really good dialogue in the movie. I personally did not like the whole "plot twist" when Cid returned from the States. The twist made the movie a little more confusing, and it was hard to understand some of the details, because most of the dialogues were so fast that I didn't know what they were talking about. It could have been a little better if the movie had been a little longer, and if they would have explained everything a little better, that would have made it even better. The ending was disappointing, because it had been so good up to that point. In general, I think this movie had some great acting, especially from Javier Bardem, and I liked the plot, although it was not great, it was a good movie. I think that if you are interested in Spanish/Spanish movies, you should watch this movie. I just watched the Spanish version of it, and I am not a big fan of the original Spanish version. I am just glad that I have watched the American version. Overall, I think that this movie was enjoyable, but it is not as good as the original Spanish version. I just felt like there was too much time wasted in the American version, and not enough in the original Spanish version. Overall, I give this movie 7 out of 10 stars, and I really recommend it to people who want to watch a good movie.

Monday, 11 May 2020 02:46

The problem with the movie is that they do not show much. The character of Horacio de la Cruz is pretty complex but his motivations and actions are shown in a relatively superficial manner, which is the best way to show us his full personality. This is also the problem with the movie. There are many conflicts, none of which really leads to a climax. However, the climax is achieved through great acting from two actors: Pedro Coria and Enrique Soto, who play Horacio and Isabel. There is no great plot, just a lot of exciting and surprising scenes which only manage to bring you to the edge of your seat. There are a few minor weaknesses in the script, for example, I feel that the movie could have been written in the contemporary Spanish style, as it was with the TV series "Autumn and Summer." I guess they tried to avoid the "old style" in this movie and I think they succeeded. Overall, "The Crown of Fujimori" is a wonderful movie which gives you a sense of the life of the king and the country. The story is great and the actors are fantastic.

Friday, 24 Apr 2020 12:55

I saw this film in London for a screening as part of a presentation for the 15th year anniversary of Panorama, which was held there in September 2016. This film is about the members of the armed conflict in El Salvador (1974-89). The film is very realistic and there are scenes with many atrocities which have to be seen to be believed. I felt that this film is particularly about the poor people and children who were the target of the armed conflict, who, by far, are the most at risk. It was also very realistic, in the sense that you could see the suffering of the people around the 'target'. This is a very very realistic film about the situation in El Salvador and the plight of the innocent victims.

Friday, 24 Apr 2020 09:29

There's always some danger with adapting a book into a movie, and I am not sure of any more than this movie. The book, El burro del diablo, was published in 1973. The movie, The Blue Horse, was released in 1980. In the book, the Blue Horse has no leader, but the citizens all act as one, like in a hive. They cooperate in picking up rubbish, and work at their own rates. The part about the big, red horse was changed for the American remake, although the idea was still there. The first thing that struck me about this movie is the story. But it's actually much more than that. The movie is mostly about a mayor who gets the attention of the Dutch minister to get his city back. He is not happy that the Dutch government is going to make the island un-owned and he believes it's a waste. He sets out to get rid of the Dutch, but not without the help of the Blue Horse, the mayor's strong-willed daughter. The people on the island are all very different, some are crazy, some are clean and some don't drink. It's difficult to say how much this movie was inspired by the book. I can only think of two scenes that were repeated, so the movie could be compared to the book. In the first one, the mayor announces that the Blue Horse will become the mayor of the island. In the second, the mayor is going to call the police and bring the Blue Horse into the village, to prevent the mayor from taking over. I'm not sure which one is more important. I think the second one is more important. But the movie is far from being a masterpiece. The cinematography is good, although some shots look very soft and fake. The background music is good, with occasional bursts of upbeat music. It adds the right atmosphere. The movie is not the best thing out there, but it's a good movie, if you ask me.

Friday, 24 Apr 2020 09:17

In another comment, someone commented that the movie was a "rebirth" of Mies van der Rohe. I am sorry, but it was not Mies' original film. Not a penny of its substance was copied from him. It is a drama/movie with several aspects and techniques. When the press previewed it, there were a few people who got all excited and out of their seats. They clearly didn't understand the film. The same way when I watched Carmen Fulcher's "Tango" film, I realized it was just a character study of a lady in search of her identity. That's what "La rue des auteurs" was. When the film ended, I realized that there was no storyline that was completely clear. But it did have a good pace and the actors all did a very good job. I recommend it.

See all 23 reviews

Write a review