x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch The Public Image is Rotten

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(194) 8.1 103 min 2017

The Public Image is Rotten is a movie starring John Lydon, Michael Alago, and Martin Atkins. The story of PiL, the groundbreaking band form by John Lydon after the collapse of The Sex Pistols in 1978.

Starring: Martin Atkins, John Lydon, Michael Alago, Ginger Baker

Genres: Documentary

Director: Tabbert Fiiller

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Documentary
Director	Tabbert Fiiller
Stars	Martin Atkins, John Lydon, Michael Alago, Ginger Baker
Country	USA
Runtime	1H 43M
Description	The story of PiL, the groundbreaking band form by John Lydon after the collapse of The Sex Pistols in 1978.

Download documentary «The Public Image is Rotten»

Blu-ray
13.56 GB

Windows
5.26 GB

Customers who watched «The Public Image is Rotten» also watched

21 customer reviews about «The Public Image is Rotten»

4.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Monday, 13 Jul 2020 18:18

If you're a young person with an interest in the industry, this movie might interest you. I don't know if it will be for you, but it is worth watching. But this movie is one of the most depressing documentaries I've ever seen. The characters are so fake and unsympathetic, you find yourself wishing for the movie to end. This is just not how the entertainment industry is supposed to be like. Even in the 1970's and 1980's, there was no problem with diversity, only with the blatant sexism. The movie could have easily gone to show how this was done in the 1970's and 1980's, and it still wouldn't have been as bad. The movie is about the most sexist movie ever made, that shows the worst of the worst in the industry, and it even shows the worst of the worst in the industry's own character. The only thing that makes this movie tolerable is that it's so badly made.

Saturday, 11 Jul 2020 23:06

This documentary is a very informative and entertaining look at the world of the infamous "Grey Lady" in Paris and its relationship with the French film industry. It follows the life of one of the most famous actresses in the world, Diane Keaton, and how she deals with the public image of her films. While she is the most famous actress in the world, she is not a famous actress. What I enjoyed most about this documentary is that it focuses on the French film industry. We see how the movies are made, the cinematography, the script, and the art department. There are many fascinating interviews with leading French film makers. This documentary is very well made. There are many interviews with directors and actors, but I would have preferred to see more of the production and art department. But it's still a great documentary. It's definitely worth seeing.

Thursday, 02 Jul 2020 19:14

I watched this on the off chance it might be worth a look. It's an interesting documentary. I found the story interesting. I had no expectations of what to expect. I was blown away. The only thing I didn't like about the documentary was that I was quite impressed with the level of honesty the subjects gave. I liked the fact that they were so honest and forthright. Some of the information that they gave was so ridiculous that I felt they were being honest. I really thought that the stories were compelling and fascinating. I would recommend this documentary to anyone who is interested in learning more about the internet. It's definitely worth watching.

Tuesday, 30 Jun 2020 04:29

What I liked most about the movie was that it was like a soap opera. You know it is going to be a soap opera when you have a couple of people talking in that way. It is as if you are watching a soap opera. If you were to watch it for the first time, it is like a soap opera. The whole movie is like a soap opera, and that is the way I wanted to see it. I think the way the movie was presented was very interesting and it made it very enjoyable to watch. There were parts that were not realistic, but those are the parts that were the most entertaining. The film makers did a very good job in portraying the problem that so many people have with respect to Muslims. The movie starts out with a lot of suspense, and then the movie picks up the pace and turns into a soap opera. I thought the acting was good, and I enjoyed the way the movie was presented. I would recommend this movie to anyone who is interested in Muslim affairs, and I would recommend this movie to anyone who is interested in having a good conversation about religion.

Saturday, 27 Jun 2020 13:43

It's nice to see some documentaries from the recent past that try to bring a new perspective on the common public opinion of various subjects. This documentary focuses on the shocking rise in HIV/AIDS in the United States, in particular the fear of AIDS being spread by the media and the pressure that people were under in the 1960s and 1970s to look the other way about the epidemic. The idea is that most people would be too afraid to report an AIDS case, as it was a taboo subject then. The documentary starts with interviews with many survivors of AIDS who share their stories and how the epidemic made them want to commit suicide. They also share their opinions on the subject of AIDS, what they thought the media should be doing about it and how they dealt with the disease in their own lives. The documentary then goes into some historical background of the AIDS epidemic and interviews with people who lived through it, such as David Levithan (of The Pillow Book fame), writer/director Robert Luketic and writers Jeff Kotcheff and Daniel Dauber. All of these interviews are very well done, and are filled with interesting anecdotes and personal stories of how they were affected by the disease. The documentary then delves into the question of whether people actually saw a link between AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, or whether it was just a lot of people getting HIV from the air and from sex. The film concludes that it was the latter. In general, this documentary is very well done, and I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in the AIDS epidemic and the AIDS/HIV disease. It's very interesting to see how the disease has changed people's views about it, and also what people think today about the disease.

Wednesday, 24 Jun 2020 22:49

It's not the best documentary I've seen, but it's good enough. Its strong points are the images of its subjects. We have interviews with John Millepied, who works in a school in Mexico City. We also have interviews with the director of the school and a former student. All of them have a unique story to tell about how they came to work in that school. We also see a lot of "self-reflection" by the students. We see them talking about their past and their family life. The students all talk about their memories and how they don't like to talk about them. When asked what they are, the students all reply with a smile. The director of the school is Mr. Vigar, who worked as a photographer for the New York Times and has worked as a videographer in a variety of media. He has told us how he felt about the relationship between the people in his school and the press. He also talked about his family life. He's also talked about how he spent his days trying to make a documentary about the situation in his school. He used to play on the phone with his mom. At one point, he even tells his mother that he wants to give her a present. He goes on to tell us about his family and how he feels that his family is more important than the school. He says that he wants to change the world through photography. The director talks about how he works in a school that has many problems, and how he deals with it. The teacher who works at the school has a very difficult job. She gets very little sleep and is afraid to take her own lunch. She is also afraid of the children in her class. Her fear of the children is what makes her the way she is. The photographer talks about how he is forced to go to work in Mexico and that he gets along with the Mexican people. He also tells us about his feelings about Mexico. We also see the director's life, where he talks about how he's lonely, and how he doesn't know where to find love. We also see him and his wife and kids. The director has had a very difficult relationship with his family, and this documentary is what keeps him going. In his documentary, he talks about his life, and he shows us how he deals with the problems that he has. He talks about how he's afraid of giving up, and that he's never been happy. We also see his family, who is very happy that he's never married and that he has never had children. They talk about how he has two children and how they are very happy. The father also talks about how he is very happy and how he talks about his children with his daughter. They all talk about how happy they are. This documentary is a little bit of a bore. It's slow. The director tells us a lot about himself and his life, but it's not that interesting. There's no question of what is going to happen in the end. This documentary is good enough to be watched once, but not great. It's better to watch it as a documentary about the school, but I wouldn't really recommend it as a documentary about the country.

Friday, 19 Jun 2020 11:21

I don't know how many times I've seen the ad for this movie, and it's still one of the best. This movie was originally made to advertise this line of items. But they obviously needed to sell more. I'm still curious to know how many people actually saw this movie. I'm guessing it was in the $5 range at most. But I still think it was pretty great. If you have a choice between watching this or a movie about someone trying to commit suicide, then this is the movie. I would probably go see this movie again, but not for free. It's not something you could see in a theater, you have to go out of your way to see. If you like movies that make you think, then this is the movie for you. Overall, it's a good movie, but I still think the "next logical step" was in "The Blair Witch Project." I'm sure they're not that good, but I liked the atmosphere. If you're a student of film, then this is a movie you should see.

Sunday, 14 Jun 2020 05:42

I just saw the Public Image, it's a documentary about how an extremely prolific Canadian Director, Neil Blomkamp, creates his unique and different movies, and how he brings the audience into the experience, which includes an in depth interview with him and his producer (an actor in his film). Blomkamp explains how his movies are the most unique, visually captivating, and compelling he's ever done, and the team at Blomkamp Films, led by a famous cinematographer, Joe Letteri, put the finishing touches on the finished film, to bring it to the screen. It's very cool to see how Blomkamp used the black and white film stock in his movies, and also how they did not use the same computerized camera movements used in most other movies. The documentary is also a great insight into how Blomkamp and his crew did their work. The first movie he made was District 9, which I absolutely loved. The movie was also inspired by a very cool idea, which was that Blomkamp wanted to create a world that looked like a dark forest, but also had a very dark, dystopian tone. District 9 was such a great movie, and I still think it's one of my favorite movies, along with Collateral Beauty. I was also very impressed by how he got the stars to be in his movies, and how he got the cinematography to be exactly like in his movies. But one thing I didn't understand, is that in District 9, we see a very short clip from the movie, but then it changes to a different camera shot. Why did they change that? Is it so that we can understand how the movie was filmed, or was it just to make the movie more visually appealing? All I know is that the movie looks very beautiful, and is a very impressive movie. I was also very impressed with the fact that Blomkamp does not use the same camera movements in all of his movies. I know I love his movie, District 9, but I did not think it was as good as I thought it was. This documentary is worth watching. The fact that it is very unique, visually engaging, and a great documentary, makes it even more worth watching. I can't wait to see Blomkamp's next movie.

Tyler Washington

Thursday, 11 Jun 2020 09:00

I thought this was a great documentary on the subject of corruption in the legal system. I was really interested to see how much of the story was actually true and how much was created by the lawyers and what they had to gain from the stories they told. It was a really interesting film that told the story of what is happening in the US and how much corruption there is in the legal system. The lawyers are really the ones that get caught up in the stories, so I thought this documentary was really good at that. One of the things that the documentary really showed was that the lawyers were not the only ones that are corrupt. The legal system was also corrupt and so was the people that worked for the lawyers. The movie also showed a lot of the legal system problems that are being used to convict people. It also showed how judges can be influenced by the lawyers and the judges can be biased and judge based on how much money they have. I also thought the documentary was really well done and showed the case with a lot of accuracy and some really good information. I really thought this was a great documentary that should be seen by everyone.

Thursday, 04 Jun 2020 14:05

I don't want to say much about this documentary, but I did enjoy it. The only part I didn't like was the depiction of the public image. It was in a negative way, which was disappointing. However, the movie was very interesting. I found it interesting how much the public think about what they say and what they say, and I found the audience fascinating. I have to say that this documentary doesn't make a lot of sense to me. But it did make me laugh and I liked the way it was filmed. If you are in a position to understand, this documentary is worth watching.

Wednesday, 27 May 2020 11:43

This documentary is quite fascinating, although not without its flaws. What makes the film worthwhile is the attempt to capture a little bit of a time in the life of the celebrities. We see the questions they have to answer about their childhood and the reasons behind their fame, and we get to hear their thoughts and experiences. The interviewees are talented, insightful, and fascinating. These interviews are presented in a manner that gives the viewers an intimate look at their lives, and makes us feel as if we are living with them. The documentary is also interesting for the way it is presented. It seems like it would be a typical documentary, but is actually much more than that. The interviews are often very deep, and it's hard to find the time to focus on them, but the directors do a very good job at capturing the essential essence of the interviewees. As a whole, this documentary is a worthwhile effort, and I would recommend it.

Tuesday, 26 May 2020 10:13

I watched the film, about a year ago, as part of my PhD in Film Studies. I was impressed by the diversity of the voices of the film makers, who included different political viewpoints. In the end, this film would have benefited from a more personal and detailed narrative, to really explore the impact of violence on individuals and communities. There are very few films about violence that tackle this aspect. One interesting aspect of the film is the non-fiction approach that is taken in the film. It is clear that this film was made by a person who was affected by violence in her family, and her desire to make a film about the subject. I would recommend this film to anyone who is interested in understanding the impact of violence on individuals, and the world. It is very educational, and I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in exploring the topic.

Saturday, 23 May 2020 19:27

While I've been following the rise of a few film projects that have found success, one of the biggest things that I've been watching are the popular and critically acclaimed movies that didn't really get a chance to be seen. Like "Pride and Prejudice" or "Lolita," the movies that have become cult favorites are coming out with sequels and remakes and more. I saw "Rotten," and "The Public Image," and I thought they were great. I saw the film with a group of friends that went to see it, and they also thought it was great. The most important thing about a movie like this is that it has to be something that you can relate to. The guys who went to see it wanted to see a movie about life, and that is the biggest thing I've been looking for. I have never liked Richard Curtis' movies, and this one is no exception. I think that it is one of his best, and I was not disappointed. I really enjoyed this movie because of the things I enjoyed in the first one. It has a lot of style, but I did like the simplicity. The whole point of this movie is to be different, and this movie is a step for Curtis to have a bit more fun with his films. I think he's better than ever, and I hope that the public will like this movie.

Monday, 18 May 2020 13:47

How do we define the public image of a company? I think the people who are making the movie "Inside Out" are good at this, but it doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. What makes a company good is that they can tell the audience what they are going to do next and how. Not every company does this, and not every company will tell you what's going to happen next. The real reason for the company being good is that it can tell the audience how it should be, which is pretty hard to do. A lot of companies don't tell the audience how they should be, and so it makes it hard to be really good at it. I think this movie could have been a good one, if they had spent a little more time explaining the technology of the film. It would have made the movie more realistic. The story is interesting and it has a lot of questions, but I don't think that it answers any of them. This movie is great at showing us how a company works, but it doesn't really answer any questions about how it works. If you want to see how Pixar works, see this movie, but if you want to see how Pixar does it, see this movie. It's not a bad movie, but it's not a great movie either.

Nicholas Fields

Friday, 15 May 2020 23:02

The Public Image is Rotten is a documentary that looks at how an actor, who is known for his portrayal of a dashing, swashbuckling hero in "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves" was actually a closeted homosexual and drug addict who once made himself a victim of his own media image. It's an interesting look at the man who gave the audience a great performance in a genre that's often maligned. The film is more interesting because it shows how much of an image the public has of actor Johnny Depp, who now works on the television series "The Pirates of Penzance," and how his fame was a catalyst for his addiction and to becoming a drug addict. The movie does a good job of showing the reactions of the public when they find out about Depp's homosexual tendencies, but it also shows how much of a role his sexuality played in his acting career, as well as his drug addiction. Overall, this film is a must-see because it will get you thinking about the roles and characters you've seen in movies and TV shows, and what role they play in a person's life. It's a very interesting look at a man who made a career out of playing a stereotypical character, but who is now revealed to be a closeted homosexual and drug addict. There's also some great quotes throughout the film that you'll need to listen to, but the film also shows you how the public reacted to his secret life, which I think is a great way to show that what people believe about someone shouldn't be the way that they think. You can definitely say that the film is a positive look at a man who, despite what he was once known for, is now an icon to the gay community and to many in the general public.

Thursday, 07 May 2020 14:43

This documentary takes a look at the world of pornography. I liked this documentary for a number of reasons. The first reason is the fact that it doesn't try to present pornography as a victim, but as a monster. This makes the film more realistic, and makes it more difficult for some people to justify their own lives as being a part of the porn industry. The second reason is that it doesn't preach to the viewers about the evils of pornography. The majority of the time, this is not the case, but instead it presents facts and opinions about the subject. This helps to raise awareness about the issues that we as viewers face, and it also allows us to debate the topic for ourselves. I would recommend this documentary to anyone who likes to learn more about pornography.

Wednesday, 22 Apr 2020 02:33

As a seasoned film critic, I really like films with a good story and not much of the bullshit, but if I were to give this film a 10/10 rating I would. The film is entertaining and has a great narrative style, the story is great and really interesting. I thought the acting was also good, but I am not sure what they could have done with the entire story, but I think it was a very good film. The only thing I did not like was that the film was really long, and it was very boring at times. If you are looking for a good film, check this out.

Wednesday, 22 Apr 2020 00:50

I'm not one of the guys that goes to watch documentary's on the Internet. They seem to make me uncomfortable. I like to sit back and listen and learn from them. The two documentaries this year were both very good. One was "Traffic" and the other was "Collateral". Both of these documentaries were filmed in different ways and the way they are filmed is very different. For instance, the documentary on Traffic was a real production with real actors. It's pretty much like an interview with a real person. It's very interesting and well-done. This documentary on Collateral is a lot more complicated and I didn't think it was so good. I don't think the production was as good as the other one. The documentary is a very very long one and you are actually watching it for more than 1.5 hours. The interviews with the people that were in Collateral were very good. It's really interesting to see people who were in Collateral talk about their experiences and you learn a lot about their lives. I would say this documentary is the best one I have seen this year and definitely worth watching.

Tuesday, 21 Apr 2020 23:32

Despite the fact that this is a bad movie, it's still pretty good. What's also good is that it isn't based on a true story, so it's really hard to make a movie like this. It's also funny, which I don't think most movies are. I thought it was very funny. The movie isn't without its flaws. I don't know if I'll buy it, but I'll definitely watch it again. It's definitely a good film to watch.

Tuesday, 21 Apr 2020 21:49

Although the film is somewhat dated, it is entertaining and at times amusing. It is not, however, particularly interesting. It is not a film to be seen again, although the ideas and points made are well-attested. The other reviewers seem to have missed the point of the film, which is that a president who has spent the last eight years making some of the worst decisions ever made by a nation, and who now has to be re-elected by the American people, is a president who is vulnerable to corruption, if he has any integrity left. Even in his recent, too-brief, illness, he is no more likely to be a man of integrity than he is to be the boss of an executive producer.

Tuesday, 21 Apr 2020 18:46

The Public Image is Rotten is a documentary that follows the life of the late late night talk show host Michael Richards, who lost his beloved wife in a plane crash while on a flight from Miami to San Francisco. The film consists of interviews with Richards' close friends and colleagues, his children, his wife, and his staff. The film does an excellent job of explaining why the public is so upset with Richards' work, and why he had so many fans. While there is a lot of good material in the film, there are a few instances that are not explained as well as they could have been. The film also does not cover Richards' many controversies, which might have been a better idea for a documentary. While there are a lot of moments that could have been better, this is still a good documentary that provides a good insight into the life of a great person.

See all 21 reviews

Write a review