x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch 350 Days

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(265) 6.7 108 min 2018

350 Days is a movie starring Bret Hart, Billy Graham, and Greg Valentine. 350 Days peels back the curtain on the severe toll pro wrestlers endured on the road 350 days a year, a toll on their bodies, families, and psyches.

Starring: Billy Graham, Jimmy Snuka, Bret Hart, Greg Valentine

Genres: Sport, Documentary

Director: Fulvio Cecere

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Sport, Documentary
Director	Fulvio Cecere
Stars	Billy Graham, Jimmy Snuka, Bret Hart, Greg Valentine
Country	Canada, USA
Also Known As	350 Days - Legends. Champions. Survivors
Runtime	1H 48M
Description	350 Days peels back the curtain on the severe toll pro wrestlers endured on the road 350 days a year, a toll on their bodies, families, and psyches.

Download sport «350 Days»

Blu-ray
13.61 GB

Windows
5.31 GB

Customers who watched «350 Days» also watched

20 customer reviews about documentary «350 Days»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Sunday, 12 Jul 2020 11:42

This is a documentary about a young girl who grows up in the world of the professional wrestling. She is a pro wrestler who trains at a gym and tries to get her dream of being a champion. She is strong and strong willed. This film is very good and has an interesting plot. It is a well made documentary that is worth watching. The acting is not great but the director of this documentary does a very good job. It is not for everybody but it is a good film for the wrestling fan.

Tuesday, 30 Jun 2020 17:04

I don't think this movie really talks about the Olympic Trials, but I also don't think it is trying to be too critical of any athlete. That's not the point. It's not saying anything bad about any one person, just that you can't be in any one sport for long and you can't have a long career in any one sport. It's not saying that the players in any sport are all bad, just that the best ones have a long career, the worst ones don't. I liked the fact that they are comparing what they saw on the field to what they saw in their personal lives. It's not about the athlete at all. It's about a situation in the lives of people, and the coach really wants to help his players, but he doesn't want to be part of the team, because he thinks he has a responsibility as a coach. I think this movie was interesting because it made me think about the athletes in the Olympics and how they go through the season and the trials. I thought that it was a good film, it was a little bit too long, but I think it was interesting to see how these people lived their lives and how they tried to do everything they could to be good and not be a burden to their teammates. It's about the Olympics, it's about the teams, it's about the coaches, and it's about the athletes. It's not really about them. It's not really about the coaches. I think it was good, and it was very good.

Tuesday, 30 Jun 2020 11:07

I've never written a review for a movie before. After seeing this movie, I felt compelled to do so, as this was the most dramatic and gripping story I've ever seen. It's hard to explain, but I had tears in my eyes throughout the movie. If you like stories like the one presented in this movie, you will also like this one.

Sunday, 28 Jun 2020 21:52

This film is a long one, but the story, which it portrays is a worthy one. We all know that since there's always more to be done than we can accomplish, and we all know how this can be with a push of a button, but we don't have to suffer through endless lectures on how "you can't have everything you want, it has to be a compromise". In this film, we see that many people are suffering from that same dilemma. What's worse is that the people in power get very irritated when people like us, who understand the struggle, fail to rise up and fight for what we believe in. The problem isn't so much with the individuals in power, but more so with the people who are supposed to be on their side. That's the only way I can describe it. It's a great film, with good acting and some great information. It's a must see for those who want to know about the struggles that many people suffer through.

Lawrence Fields

Monday, 22 Jun 2020 14:42

The story of a young girl named Lori who returns to her hometown of West Virginia after spending time with a hospital in New York City. There she meets and befriends a boy who's a former wrestler, Dale Earnhardt Jr. who has been training for years for the 1992 Daytona 500, and now his daughter is in town. They are in love with each other and Lori decides to help Dale with his race. They share the money they make from their race and make sure Dale gets enough to support himself, his daughter, and their friends. In the end, Dale Jr. has to leave his friends behind and he has to return to his hometown. This is a great story, that has a lot of reality, but it also has a great message of friendship and the importance of family. There are a few problems, like Dale Earnhardt Jr. doesn't look like the real Dale Earnhardt and I wonder if he ever wrestled. But there are also many good parts, like Dale Earnhardt Jr. talking about his past, and the people he met when he was younger, and how he can relate to his son and daughter. The race is exciting and fun, and the actors do a great job. The thing that I found most impressive is how the film handles race scenes, especially the first race. The first race is fun and exciting, but it also has a little bit of drama in it. The people who made this film did a good job with that first race. Overall, I really enjoyed this film. It is an excellent movie, that is worth seeing, especially if you are a fan of the sport of NASCAR. The acting is good, the music is great, and it has a great message of friendship and the importance of family.

Monday, 22 Jun 2020 08:46

This is a very good documentary about the men and women of the Texas Rangers who were involved in the shooting of the escaped Nazi war criminal in 1973. The story is told by the Rangers who were there during the shooting and the public and media who was not. The story is well told, accurate and very well done. There are a lot of factual errors in the film. I personally thought it was a very accurate documentary, but there are some factual errors that are very important. The movie does a good job of showing how accurate the film is and at the same time explaining how important this story is. I will give this a 7 out of 10.

Thursday, 11 Jun 2020 15:38

The movie revolves around the U.S. Olympic Team and its preparations for the 1976 Olympics in Montreal. To start, let me say that this is not the Olympics as we know it. In fact, this is a fictional movie set in Montreal and all of the athletes, coaches, trainers, and other participants are fictitious characters. The athletes are all fictitious characters, and the movie doesn't actually have any athletes in it. It's a fictional movie about the Olympics and the preparations for the games. There are no actual athletes in the movie. As a result, the movie has a very light touch. There are no real actors. This makes it much more interesting. The movie is so much like the real thing. It's not even close to being accurate. The biggest problem I have with the movie is that it's a little too realistic. I mean, athletes do do things in the real Olympics that the athletes in this movie do. But they're not realistic. I mean, it's not like you could really go through the training with a bunch of guys that are a mile away from the Olympics. But I don't know if that's the movie's problem or the actual Olympic rules. But the movie is good because of that. The movie is very entertaining and I think most people will enjoy it. This is the kind of movie I like. It's about nothing but the Olympics. I think this is the kind of movie that a lot of people would like. It's kind of like a video game.

Wednesday, 10 Jun 2020 08:20

This film is about the last days of the heroic Dutchman, Heinz Hopper. It is his story, his heart and his love. It's a sad, heavy, beautiful film. The performances are superb. The film is shot in the style of a documentary and the music is lovely. The film is only 74 minutes, but it moves slowly. There are no big set pieces. It's just a man's story and that's what matters. The music is haunting, the music of a man who had lost his faith. It's haunting and touching. The film is beautiful and touching and sad. It's a good film. It's not perfect, but it's good. If you're looking for a film to watch and to understand, watch this film.

Saturday, 06 Jun 2020 04:10

7/10. But the documentary was not about the incredible stories told here, but how this story got published. While I admire the authors' willingness to put their time and energy into writing a book, I did not expect to have to sit through a documentary that I knew would not be as balanced as it would be. It is interesting to note that the documentary producers have an apparent bias, as they feel it necessary to give the book's authors a voice in the film. I can appreciate that the book has a very good story, but the book is hardly a classic, and one would think that this documentary would have an equal level of balance. While the documentary focuses on the most prominent and significant stories of the book, it never mentions the others that are important to the overall narrative. One might expect the documentary to highlight the book's greatest strengths, but the documentary simply focuses on the most prominent stories, and does not address the many other stories that contributed to the book's success. It is also interesting to note that the documentary filmmakers were not given an opportunity to do a deep dive into the authors' lives, such as interviewing the wife of the author, other family members, or other members of the public. While the filmmakers would have liked to have explored this, they chose not to do so. While this was a good opportunity to go into the larger life stories of the authors, it would have also been good to explore the lives of the authors' children, who did not receive a lot of attention from the documentary producers. I am not sure how many of the authors' children would have been interviewed, as it would have required a great deal of time and effort, and it is doubtful that many would have agreed to be interviewed. On the other hand, I am sure that many of the authors' children would have agreed to be interviewed, and given that they were in the audience for most of the documentary, it would have been interesting to see what their lives were like. The documentary makes some very good points, such as the importance of keeping the tradition of making one's own candles, and that there should be much more emphasis placed on the author's sons. But, the documentary also shows many other strengths in the book. For example, the book's character of Sally was well developed, as was the character of Jim. Jim's passion for his father was well described, and Sally's work as a teacher was also well described. The movie also showed how difficult it is to come out of a hardscrabble upbringing, and how hard it is to come out

Tuesday, 02 Jun 2020 11:46

The year is 1974, and Sam was a young lawyer with a wife and two children. He was a career-minded student and he studied at a top law school. He did not know anything about tennis. He knew that tennis was a very popular sport, but he had never played the game. The women were not his thing, and he did not do much watching them play. He was looking forward to this game, and when the tennis match came along, he was thrilled. Then, a rumor started spreading that tennis was losing its popularity. Many people started to doubt the popularity of the sport. The Tennis Hall of Fame kept people in suspense, and Sam was not happy about it. He thought he could do something about it. That was when he met Gilda Radner. She was very different from other women. She was an attorney and had her own private tennis club. She was beautiful and had a great game. He had no idea what to do, but she wanted to see what he did. She helped him become interested in tennis, and she was also interested in him. They started to see each other every day, and Sam did not have a clue what to do about it. She was the only one he had ever met who could see him, and she knew how he looked at her. They were not serious about anything, and he did not know how to express himself. They did not talk much, but he did not do anything to harm her. They fell in love, and Sam was excited about it. She liked him, and they got married. He was happy about the whole thing, but he was worried about the future of tennis. He could not see what would happen if he played his tennis. She was a very strong player, and he had never seen her lose a match. He never did play the game, and he did not know how to play. He was also worried about what might happen if he was defeated. He did not play the game very well, but he was determined to win. He had great hopes, and was determined to make the right choice. He decided to play the game, and he did win, but he did not think he could win. He was just not good enough, and he could not think of any way to beat Gilda. Gilda was a very strong player. She was very good at the game, and she was very happy to see him play. She was in love with him, and she could not understand why he was not going to win. He was not a good enough player

Saturday, 30 May 2020 21:00

This is a documentary about the man who had everything in the world, a wife, kids, house, money, everything. But not everything. His mother, sister, and wife all died and his life was one without a purpose. After 30 years, after 20 years of refusing to accept responsibility, he was back on his old life, just another old man living in the old house. We get to see him for the first time since the accident. He is a very quiet, dignified man. You feel that he is not really a man but just a man. The man who could make a way out of a quagmire and become the poster boy for a great cause. The man who could make a difference. I really loved this film. The documentary is very engaging. We see his life and you get the feeling that he is really a very decent person who just has a very difficult life. It is very moving to see how he is a man who is willing to let go of everything, letting go of his family and everything else, letting go of everything he has. He is an example of a man who has reached a point where he is willing to let go and live life to the fullest. It is a very moving film and one I highly recommend to anyone who wants to know what it is like to be a man in the 60's. I would recommend this film to anyone. I give it a B+.

William Jackson

Saturday, 30 May 2020 15:04

You can probably watch this movie on your own for free. Not really worth the money for me. I have no idea why the rating is so high. I felt very disengaged. I don't know why they put in some huge plot that has nothing to do with the actual story. I felt it was a drag at times. Maybe it is because I don't really like the subject matter. The only reason I gave it a 7 is because it is a short movie.

Monday, 25 May 2020 03:36

This film was not the most important thing I've ever seen. But I watched it anyway. It was just so many emotions I was having right from the beginning. I am surprised that this movie did not have an Academy Award nomination. I just want to make it clear that I am not a fan of Oscar films. There are plenty of great films out there. But I think this film was simply an excellent film. It definitely had a message for all of us. And it has a great message. It also had a great message to the world. So there you go. It's not what I expected. But it was good. I give it 7 out of 10. It was entertaining and entertaining is the only thing I can say for this film.

Thursday, 21 May 2020 05:23

I was a little disappointed in the first one. I am also a big fan of the first 2 movies, so I was looking forward to seeing this one. Unfortunately, I did not like it as much as I expected. The first one was more about the story and the drama of what happened to him, and this one is more about the romance between these two. The movie started off with the first 3 months of their relationship, and it was very slow in the beginning. They talked a lot, but there was not enough time to build up any kind of relationship. It felt like they were getting to know each other a little bit, but not really. I think they could have picked up right where they left off at the end of the movie, but they did not. There was no conflict between them and I don't think there was any conflict between them and each other. I think they had a better chemistry in the first one, but in this one they seemed to just be talking. The romance is also a little bit forced in the movie. The movie could have worked out much better if they had had a better story line. In the first one, the movie had some drama and the drama was built up well. It was just right to the point where you could really get attached to the characters and you could feel the emotions they were feeling. This movie did not have that. They did not build up the drama very well, but it was still good enough. The movie was also kind of slow. There were a few points where I was like "wow, I am not even getting to see this movie anymore, because I know it is going to be great, but it is just not going to be good enough to carry this movie." I think the ending of the movie was good, but not as good as the last one. It did not have the same emotional power as the last one. In the last movie, the final battle was pretty epic and you could feel the emotions of the characters when the end was coming. This movie had the same feeling. They could have easily made the movie just to get the viewer to the climax, but they did not. They tried to do that a few times, but the viewer would not feel what the characters were feeling. In the end, this movie was kind of mediocre and I think I would say that the movie was average. It was not very good and did not do anything really spectacular. But it was good enough for me to recommend this movie to friends, but not to really try and make a big deal

Sunday, 17 May 2020 01:14

I've watched this movie several times, and I'm still amazed at how well it holds up. It's a tough and emotional movie, and although it takes place in the late 70s, it looks as if it could have been made in the 50s, if you like that sort of thing. It's also a beautiful, inspirational story, and one that is clearly intended to help women of the time to look forward to a better future. The film really is a testimony to the fact that things are not always what they seem, and it's certainly not about women to blame for being beaten, raped or exploited. In this case, the main character is a young, black, American woman who has to deal with the humiliation and abuse of her male employers. It's a very difficult story, and the performances are quite good. The problem is that it's not the greatest movie out there, but it is a very good film, and one that is very representative of the period it is based on. It's worth watching.

Wednesday, 06 May 2020 08:07

I saw this movie recently and I am not a big fan of documentaries. They are very slow and slow the whole time. They just don't show you the whole story and how the story connects. But this movie did that. There is a lot of stuff in this movie that I didn't really know, which is great. It shows the story of various people who had a very close relationship with one another. I think it is an excellent movie and a must-see for everyone. It is also very funny. If you have a chance to see it, do it.

Saturday, 02 May 2020 15:51

I don't know why this film has been rated so low. It's a compelling story about the struggles of a young guy in love with a woman of his own age. It's not as though he has a "sick" wife or boyfriend, as some have said. It's more like he has a crush on a beautiful young woman who is too young to remember him by name. (I should add that I am in the same age bracket as the protagonist.) It's not the sort of film I would like to watch more than once. But the title is misleading, and the director of photography was the guy who gave us the beautiful shot in "The Blue Lagoon." Anyway, a very enjoyable film.

Tuesday, 14 Apr 2020 12:23

I just watched this movie. And what a waste of time it is. It's one of those movies that you feel bad for watching. You feel like you are ruining your life just by watching it. It is hard to watch it, because of the subject matter. In my opinion, I feel like the filmmakers failed. This is just a movie about a time when the only reason to go on the Olympics was the money. The problem is that this was only the beginning of a period where you are only motivated to be successful because of money. Now I know the point of this movie, but it still doesn't change the fact that it is a waste of time. The film is just about how you would feel if you had to go on the Olympics for the money. And it does a good job of showing you that feeling. The movie is interesting because it shows you the real feelings of people who are going on the Olympics, and then they go on the show. The people on the show are told they are going to be doing something that will make them famous, which is something that only money can give you. That is why the movie is interesting. The film is also interesting because it shows how it would be if there was no money involved. I will give it a 7/10. But if you are a person who is into the subject matter, it might be worth seeing.

Tuesday, 14 Apr 2020 09:57

The topic of "seven days" of "permanent physical pain" of chronic long-term amputees has been a hot topic for medical science for years now. There is a lot of information out there on the subject, and most people either dismiss it or don't bother to look at the evidence. So it's not a surprise that this movie takes a very deep look into the subject, and the director is very careful not to get too deep into it. This is not a movie that would be used to get people to look at the subject in a more impartial way. It's not a movie that would convince you that you need to see the evidence. It's a movie that would make you think about the subject. The result is a very interesting movie, that's not just a discussion of the subject, but is an attempt to make you think about the subject. One of the big problems of the subject is that it's very hard to get people to pay attention to it, and not get excited about it. So it's a lot of work to get people to pay attention to the subject. But the result of this film is that you can actually see what it's like to get used to the pain, and how it affects people. It's an extremely well-made movie, with great acting, and an interesting presentation of the subject. And the end of the movie is really a beautiful way of ending the subject. It is a very unique and interesting movie, that deserves more attention, and deserves more people to see it. Highly recommended. 7/10

Tuesday, 14 Apr 2020 07:24

The day before Thanksgiving 2005, the media reported on the tragic loss of two National Guardsmen from the first Gulf War. Their deaths were associated with the attack on the USS Cole in 2000. This documentary chronicles the recovery and investigation of the crash site, focusing on the efforts of the Navy Seals to recover the remains of the dead men. The men in the Navy are asked to accept the work of the Army in their search. Some have been reluctant to accept it. This documentary also includes a sampling of the other search efforts. It is also possible to view the film in a foreign language. This is the first film I have seen from the excellent series, "Frontline."

See all 20 reviews

Write a review