x

#FUuumovies | All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Nada a Perder 2

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(662) 3.5 96 min 2019

Nada a Perder 2 is a movie starring Petrônio Gontijo, Day Mesquita, and Beth Goulart. Part 2 of Edir Macedo's self-financed biopic.

Starring: Dalton Vigh, Petrônio Gontijo, Beth Goulart, Day Mesquita

Genres: Drama, Biography

Director: Alexandre Avancini

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Drama, Biography
Director	Alexandre Avancini
Writer	Stephen P. Lindsey, Douglas Tavolaro, Edir Macedo, Emílio Boechat
Stars	Dalton Vigh, Petrônio Gontijo, Beth Goulart, Day Mesquita
Country	Brazil
Also Known As	Nada que perder 2, Nothing to Lose 2
Runtime	1H 36M
Description	Part 2 of Edir Macedo's self-financed biopic.

Download drama «Nada a Perder 2»

Blu-ray
13.49 GB

Windows
5.19 GB

Customers who watched «Nada a Perder 2» also watched

21 customer reviews about biography «Nada a Perder 2»

3 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Tuesday, 07 Jul 2020 22:06

I like the director's short stories a lot. He is really good in telling a story. In the short story, he does it so well, it makes the movie look a little bit longer than it is. In the movie, the directors have made a little bit too much. I was expecting an even more beautiful ending. The movie ends really fast. There is no real story. The director's short stories are the most beautiful parts of his novels, and for a movie to match that in a good way, the movie should last a bit longer than two hours. That is why I think the movie would be better if the ending had been a little bit longer. Even though I liked the movie, I do not think that the director is able to say a good story in two hours.

Friday, 03 Jul 2020 12:17

There are not too many movies where a hero fights for the cause of justice. Few of them are worth watching for it alone. Yet, it's true that this movie holds an important message about the nature of the evil. As it all relates to today's climate we have to face the war between 'green' and 'red' forces. Sometimes you do not know which is which until the end. The director is one of my favorites because of this, and also because of his strong, engaging script. A great director, no doubt. All in all, this is the movie I'd watch again and again, and recommend to all.

Friday, 26 Jun 2020 03:28

One of the worst movies I have ever seen. Why? I don't know. I really don't know. The movie is really dull. There is nothing to remember, the movie is just a series of facts. Very boring. The only thing I can remember is that Jazzy Giverny was in this film. It is one of the most boring movies I have ever seen. The only way I can forgive that is by seeing the best movie I have ever seen in my life, "The Constant Gardener", which is still the best movie I have ever seen.

Friday, 19 Jun 2020 14:22

I saw this film as a last minute flight, but what a pleasant surprise! The movie is a typical Pakistani family film about the journey to get to France, so don't take this too seriously.The story may be silly and simple, but the dialogues are just so great, that you don't get bored, especially for the Pakistani actors, especially Dawood. The plot may sound ridiculous, but the movie is just so true, and so realistic, that you just can't deny it. Don't hesitate to see this movie if you are looking for a holiday!

Thursday, 18 Jun 2020 09:04

Nada a Perder 2 is an interesting follow-up to one of the most famous Argentinean crime movies. The new movie follows the life of young assistant manager of a drug gang, Rosa, with a lot of new people in his life. Most of the old gang members have returned to the streets, so they help Rosa in his battle with the law. Although the action is mainly non-violent, the plot has a lot of drama, and you will be interested to see the old gang and the new ones after the movie. The main thing that I found most interesting was the introduction of the character of Maris, a character who was important for the story. Maris is basically a someone who can keep an eye on the young boys in his neighbourhood, because he knows their families and how they live. I really like how this character was introduced. And also the last few minutes of the movie are really interesting, because it really shows how Rosa goes through a life time. Another important character is the former owner of the drug ring, Antonio. Antonio is also a person who was important in the story. The old gang members help him and explain the facts of the story to him, and I really liked how they explain the film to him. I also like the fact that he is shown in a different way to the people he was with at the start of the film. The ending was also really good because it shows that the main character is really sad and goes through the most painful thing in his life, and the sad thing is that he is having regrets. The film is really interesting, because it is much more than just about crime. It also shows how people can have their differences and change their lives. I really liked the ending of the film because it shows that Rosa's life will always have a happy ending.

Wednesday, 17 Jun 2020 19:18

A year before this film came out, an American documentary was released about a gang in Brazil. Though it was based on one of the gang leaders, none of it was shown in Brazil. This documentary has a few Brazilian actors (Klaus Kinski, Claire Danes, etc.) in it. One was great and it was amusing. The other was not so good and it was more depressing. So all in all, a worthwhile movie. It has some truth. But that's it.

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 06:03

The summer of 2006 brought a couple of really great movies, but they still left me unsatisfied. I really wanted to see "Oceans Eleven" (in theaters) but was turned off by a bad sound track that ruined the movie. The best movie of the summer of 2006 was "The Departed" and it was a beautiful look at the East Coast Mafia. I think this movie should have been a no-brainer and directed by Steven Soderbergh, and probably would have worked in a less slick Hollywood style. The performances by each cast member were nothing short of amazing and the story was extremely realistic. I think people will look at this movie and think, "Whoa, that's a nice movie." I think the more people that see this movie, the better. Although not a film for everyone, it's definitely worth seeing, and you should make it a point to see it.

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 00:07

A complex social study based on an existing subculture within the Philippines which is dark and indeed unpleasant. The movie features three characters: The darwin (a younger brother who likes to beat up the female relative with his fist) and two female sisters (four years older and somewhat passive and depressed). Both sisters apparently want to run away from their mother's house and together they plan to come out to a remote island and find a house. During their search they meet the rest of the film's cast (repetitions of a rotating cast of strangers). These are most definitely not the social outcasts of the land. Yet we hardly see a single one of them fall in love with each other. After all, a close relative like brother and sister is very rarely called by her real name - given as X. The movie is very slow, but it has some good moments. The sister of a previous writer of a well-known novel takes her to see the latest film of the writer's son. The girl is an actress with a low career but a great talent. She decides to try out acting again after ten years and she achieves some satisfaction. But the movie has some holes. I never understood the name of this old actress. It is not clear whether she is related to the writer or not. And the audience, for me, does not know whether the twins are brothers or sisters. The movie has some good characters. But the director didn't understand the whole social set in the Philippines. At one point the two sisters are actually the only social outcasts. In the end they decide to go back to the mother's house and raise their own families. I guess the movie is not ready for the Oscars. But for Filipinos, there are still a lot of social problems we can watch and learn from.

Tuesday, 09 Jun 2020 05:12

This is really a film about the problems of living in a city like Ljubljana. One can have a lot of problems living in a city. How do we avoid the negative situations? How do we create a reality of which we all share, and how do we feel? And how do we react to the situation, to the bad guys and to the good guys? We can notice that we don't really have a culture of happiness and no-one is happy. We have problems with money and if we lose the money we don't know how to return it. We have problems with the drug trade and people in the street take it. We have problems with a woman who has never been happier than the one in the film, a prostitute who has never experienced a problem with men and gets in the bad habit of meeting a total stranger, who just wants to have sex with her, and she even cannot remember him. How can we react to the situation? How do we survive? A film like this one doesn't tell us anything new. It is basically a film about how people react when there is something bad happening to them and there is no a culture of happiness. And I really liked that. Because the director made a social film that is still relevant today. He is also successful as a filmmaker in this way. The main character, the character of Silvana Bric, is completely lost in life, struggling for a sense of life. She becomes a machine. She has a phone with which she doesn't know who to call. She has a girl friend who doesn't know how to deal with problems. She does things only to satisfy herself. A stranger comes to her apartment, a couple of times, and she does what she can to be happy, only when she is alone. It is a simple film but a very important one. It shows what happens when the protagonist gets out of the city. And when she moves to the country, she has a new, or at least a new sense of happiness and it leads to a new experience for her.

Saturday, 06 Jun 2020 08:30

Vidya Balan as she has been portrayed in many Hindi movies is great.In the movie,she has done a great job.Aamir Khan's role has been good as well.But I would say that Akshay Kumar as well did a good job.However,this film has some very bad points.Boman Irani as the son of Prithviraj,has also a very poor performance.The movie has a very bad rhythm.Some scenes have also been very unrealistic.The end of the movie has a very bad music,the most realistic music in a Hindi film.BOTTOM LINE: It is a great movie if you love Akshay Kumar but it is not a good movie.This film has some very unrealistic scenes.Aamir Khan and Akshay Kumar's performances are good but the music is very unrealistic.

Wednesday, 27 May 2020 09:04

This is a good film with good actors playing nice people who fight for the sake of love. The film never tries to give a political message. All it is trying to do is show how society is wrong and we should change it. I think it shows a pretty realistic view on the modern world. And of course the actors do a good job.

Friday, 22 May 2020 15:09

I liked the movie very much. The story and all the story lines are really good. I liked the love story between the mother and daughter, the son's death and the problem with the family. The actor who plays Ines's father was really good, too. I found him very convincing in his part. Ines's character was really complex and full of mystery. The story line was very good. The actors who played Ines's mother and the son did an excellent job with their roles. I really liked the scene when Ines's mother dies. It was sad and very sad. I was very impressed with the actress who played Ines's mother, I like her very much. The movie is a perfect way to learn a lot about life in Spain and a great experience. I will be looking forward to watch this movie again!

Friday, 22 May 2020 03:24

I saw this on TV last week and I was hooked. I didn't know much about Elio who was born in Albania and went to Denmark in the '60s. I was mesmerized by the story and I have not seen any other film about this subject matter. After seeing the movie I went to Wikipedia to learn more about this story, and I found out that Elio was born in Albania, after having been educated in Denmark, but before he got to Denmark he had to deal with "the system" in Albania. I think this is one of the most interesting parts of the movie. I had a great time watching this movie and I hope it will be seen by a wider audience, the movie is so good that it could even turn into a series. It is a good film to learn more about Albania and about the struggle of the Albanians during their great cultural revolution in the '60s.

Thursday, 21 May 2020 01:54

We have finally got a movie that does not need excessive spending of big bucks. In the English language movie business, you have had to pay your ticket in advance in order to get into the theatre. This has made the budgets increase a lot and made people expecting much more. Nada a Perder 2 is no different. Even a complete stranger can enjoy this movie. A young couple (Hiro and Eun-sang) are fighting with divorce. But, there is also a lot of love between them and there are not only emotional scenes but also amusing scenes. But then, the wife realizes that the young man will be leaving her. But the movie will not stop for you to enjoy the whole movie. If you want to watch a happy movie, go and watch this movie. It will be worth your money.

Wednesday, 13 May 2020 07:29

I've seen this movie already and I didn't realize until I saw it again, that it was done by two very different directors. Instead of having two directors working in tandem, this film is split in two parts. With the story of a woman who was a ballet dancer, she was harassed by her boyfriend and she is forced to take up the singing and dancing for the gym. This allows her to pay off her debt and complete the gym's requirements and this is the story of the first part. The second part is a story of the woman who was not able to pay off her debt. It is very emotional. It is sad and at some points feels like your watching your own life. The dance sequences are incredible. When you watch the movie, you're probably going to see the dance sequences a couple times. The music by the films creators is brilliant and fit perfectly to the story. The camerawork is great, and the camera work and camera angles really help the story be put together. It is a really good movie that will give you some laughs, but also something that will help you think.

Friday, 08 May 2020 07:38

The film was interesting, not great but interesting. While I would have liked the movie to have been longer, I'm not a big fan of a 60 minute film. It was interesting to see how I am related to how they were associated with the earlier movies (Kubrick in particular). I don't know if this is the same person, but the movie is interesting. Though it seems like it might be based on real events, I don't think it is, just based on the names. I know how it ended up. I think the movie would have been great, except for the ending. The way the movie ended made it seem like it was all going to be OK, but then something changed. The movie showed how the world got it's name, but it was basically not about the name, but about what happened.

Jacqueline Hawkins

Sunday, 03 May 2020 13:43

I read the book and was very disappointed by it. The characters were no longer believable. The whole villain thing was weak and silly. The setting was also weak. The story just seemed to meld too many elements together to be an accurate representation of the book. Plus, there were too many characters and not enough story. It would have been better if the movie had a more realistic depiction of what the main characters were actually like. That and a few scenes were thrown in that were not in the book. The main characters were not to blame for the lack of good characters. The bad guys were too vague and vague. That and the special effects and the whole old Japanese setting were so overdone that it was painful to watch. Overall, this is a movie that would have been very good if it had just stayed focused on the characters and had been less contrived and more realistic. I recommend this movie only if you are a fan of the book. This is very much a "Y" movie.

Saturday, 02 May 2020 18:09

Although the 'Nada a Perder' sequels were probably very loosely based on the first film, there was still an appeal to them as there was always a dark underlying subtext to them. While the first film was a bit cliched in its sociopathic, twisted but admirable character development and the last one looked as though it was trying to be the 'Cleopatra' of its genre. That being said, 'Nada a Perder' 2 has finally come out in the United States and is available in either an extended cut or the theatrical version. It's now up to you whether you like it or not, but there are definitely reasons to see it. As the prologue, I think I will end by saying that I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. It's a very different take on the genre, even though I personally enjoyed it, it doesn't exactly resonate well with the viewers. It's quite different from any other film you've seen in the past but it's also quite entertaining. The performances are very well done, which I thought was a huge plus in the first place. I actually thought that Dinklage and Douglas did an excellent job and both of their characters were very well portrayed, I thought that the overall style of the film was enjoyable, I liked how the film didn't really stray too far from the original, but I don't think that it was necessary in the film. Some scenes were a bit too overblown but that could be a good thing. The plot was pretty much what you would expect from a film like this, which is not that good but still fun. While I am giving this a 7/10, there are also some flaws with this film, I thought that some scenes were a bit bland and weren't necessarily original or well executed. I also thought that some scenes weren't entirely believable, even though it was hard to tell what they were supposed to be. Another thing that I would like to mention is that the cinematography of the film was quite nice. I thought that the film had a fairly nice style and while I'm not a fan of very slow motion, I thought that it worked quite well. It was definitely one of the more beautiful looking films I've seen, I personally think that it was a great shot. I also liked the music score of the film, it wasn't the best, but the overall quality was good. This movie was definitely enjoyable but I think that if you're looking for the sort of film that takes you to another place that is quite unique, then you'll probably be a bit disappointed. It's an alright film and I recommend it, but I would also encourage you to watch the original as well, I'm quite sure that there are many people who would have enjoyed this as well.

Amanda Davidson

Friday, 10 Apr 2020 04:42

I don't know what it was that I watched for the first time, I was a young teen at the time. It was one of those movies that I watched when I was hanging out with my friends, we were all very religious. And I was laughing and talking and drinking. And I thought of Nada a Perder 2 a lot when I was young, I think it was too dark for me at the time, and I didn't understand a lot of the jokes, but I never forgot. I haven't watched it for a long time. But recently I watched it again, and I realized that I didn't miss much of the jokes, but there were a lot of questions. And I wonder if it's really that funny to say that you can't see God. I just don't understand it. My friends told me that we were laughing because we're atheists, but I don't believe it. Some of the jokes are really bad, like the ones about Jesus, God, God and Christmas. That's just not funny to me. I don't get what it's so funny about. And the one about the one lover (Nada a Perder 2, it's a french film, I've heard it was made in America). And the same goes for the jokes about Bartleby, the British who is the guy from the first movie. But that's not funny to me either, I just didn't understand the jokes. I don't really think I would laugh that much if I had seen the original Nada a Perder. I don't think I will watch it ever again. Because I was just laughing at the jokes. But Nada a Perder 2 was the second movie I saw, I saw it last year. And this one is pretty much the same. So it's an original movie, but it's kind of a cute movie. It has a great idea, it has great actors, and it has great laughs. It's a great movie. It's not like Nada a Perder 1 that's just for kids, I don't think it would be that funny to kids. I think that kids would enjoy it. It's got something for everyone, I recommend it to everyone. If you watch it, I think you'll like it, but I think you'll have a good time, and it'll keep you laughing. I just don't understand why they would put so many jokes into a movie that it's not that funny to me. It's pretty stupid that they put so much jokes in this movie. I'm sure that they'll make a movie like Nada a Perder 1, that's just way too boring for kids to watch, and I know that I'd be really bored too. It's a very old movie, but it's very good. 7/10

Friday, 10 Apr 2020 03:37

I am new to film, I thought of this movie as something that would be fun to watch and I wasn't disappointed. It really is a story about how one man's family and care that he has for his friends are the main factors for him becoming an administrator. This is the story of a young boy called Jorge. His father is an invalid and he is looking for someone to take care of him and his friends. His mother is not really doing very good and one of the friends offers to help but things get complicated when he is invited to be a government adviser for a year in an island in Europe. This man has his own problems. The first half is a lot of the same humour and the first half is very short. When the second half starts, it really begins to get interesting, at least for me. It is not quite like watching a film for a movie with a simple story. The story is that this man, Jorge, has a crisis, his mother is going to die in a few days and he needs a friend, someone to talk to about his problems. That is why he goes to the island in Europe. The audience needs to pay attention and this is a big task for the director and the cast. I think I understood most of the dialogs in the first half. The second half is much more exciting and this is the part where the plot develops and the film becomes quite interesting. You need to pay attention, it is not an easy movie to understand. This is the first time I have seen a movie with a cast like that and they did a good job. The cast here is really good. I loved Orlando Bloom as the government adviser, Ivan Reitman as the government adviser and Guillermo Navarro as the new boyfriend who becomes Jorge's friend. This is one of the best films I have ever seen and I give it an 8 out of 10.

Friday, 10 Apr 2020 01:24

My review of a film is not what I expected it to be. However, the trailer for "Nada a Perder 2" made me think this would be just another Hollywood garbagefest. So, I was pleased to learn that this film was actually very well made. To begin with, I'd like to point out that the director and editor must be very proud of their efforts. I have no idea how the movie was shot, but it was gorgeous and it definitely caught my attention. I noticed the selection of locations where they filmed the documentary and I liked the intimate, gritty style of the film. It was very suspenseful and I felt the climax was well done. I had no problems with the acting either. It wasn't sensationalistic, but it wasn't pretty either. As I said, I thought the movie was well made. I also noticed it was well paced and the film didn't drag. I was fascinated by the topic and how it was explored. I thought the cinematography was beautifully shot and the film was beautifully made. I recommend this film to anyone who enjoys good cinema.

See all 21 reviews

Write a review